Comprehensive care processes for substance use disorders in adult mental health services: A systematic review.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
John Reilly, Carla Meurk, Grant E Sara, Ed Heffernan
{"title":"Comprehensive care processes for substance use disorders in adult mental health services: A systematic review.","authors":"John Reilly, Carla Meurk, Grant E Sara, Ed Heffernan","doi":"10.1177/00048674241312790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Assessment and care of substance use disorder within mental health services are essential due to the high prevalence and harms associated with comorbidity. Substance use disorder assessment and care are routinely recommended in clinical guidelines; however, processes are not agreed. This systematic review of routine clinical practice in relation to substance use disorders in adult mental health service aims to identify routine assessment and diagnosis processes, the proportion of patients and service episodes in which they occur and their outputs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and relevant Cochrane databases for articles until July 2024 reporting on substance use assessment, diagnosis or treatment in adults receiving routine mental health service and locating additional articles by snowballing. Variables including setting, study method, period, cohort, substances, clinical assessment type, diagnosis and care pathways were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 137 heterogeneous studies reporting routine practice within a wide variety of adult mental health service from 29 nations, 44 (32%) expected or reported on substance use assessment in domains of pattern or impact. However, 23 studies (17%) reported structured approaches to substance use disorder assessment, while 67 (49%) reported a diagnostic structure, including classification system. Diagnostic prevalence varied markedly. Treatment was reported in 16 studies (12%) and no substance use disorder outcomes were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review shows marked variation in routine practice in mental health service across a range of substance use disorder assessment and diagnosis processes. To better identify substance use disorder, enhance its care and reduce associated morbidity, adult mental health service may benefit from standardising expectations and systematically monitoring the performance of substance use assessment and diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674241312790"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241312790","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Assessment and care of substance use disorder within mental health services are essential due to the high prevalence and harms associated with comorbidity. Substance use disorder assessment and care are routinely recommended in clinical guidelines; however, processes are not agreed. This systematic review of routine clinical practice in relation to substance use disorders in adult mental health service aims to identify routine assessment and diagnosis processes, the proportion of patients and service episodes in which they occur and their outputs.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and relevant Cochrane databases for articles until July 2024 reporting on substance use assessment, diagnosis or treatment in adults receiving routine mental health service and locating additional articles by snowballing. Variables including setting, study method, period, cohort, substances, clinical assessment type, diagnosis and care pathways were compared.

Results: In 137 heterogeneous studies reporting routine practice within a wide variety of adult mental health service from 29 nations, 44 (32%) expected or reported on substance use assessment in domains of pattern or impact. However, 23 studies (17%) reported structured approaches to substance use disorder assessment, while 67 (49%) reported a diagnostic structure, including classification system. Diagnostic prevalence varied markedly. Treatment was reported in 16 studies (12%) and no substance use disorder outcomes were reported.

Conclusion: This systematic review shows marked variation in routine practice in mental health service across a range of substance use disorder assessment and diagnosis processes. To better identify substance use disorder, enhance its care and reduce associated morbidity, adult mental health service may benefit from standardising expectations and systematically monitoring the performance of substance use assessment and diagnosis.

成人精神卫生服务中物质使用障碍的综合护理过程:系统回顾。
背景和目标:精神卫生服务机构内对物质使用障碍的评估和护理至关重要,因为它的发病率很高,并与合并症相关。药物使用障碍评估和护理是临床指南的常规建议;然而,过程没有达成一致。本文对成人精神卫生服务中与物质使用障碍相关的常规临床实践进行了系统回顾,旨在确定常规评估和诊断过程、患者比例和发生这种情况的服务事件及其产出。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase和相关的Cochrane数据库,检索截至2024年7月关于接受常规心理健康服务的成人药物使用评估、诊断或治疗的文章,并通过滚雪球法找到其他文章。变量包括环境、研究方法、时期、队列、物质、临床评估类型、诊断和护理途径。结果:在来自29个国家的137项异质性研究中,有44项(32%)研究报告了在模式或影响领域的物质使用评估。然而,23项研究(17%)报告了物质使用障碍评估的结构化方法,而67项研究(49%)报告了诊断结构,包括分类系统。诊断患病率差异显著。16项研究(12%)报告了治疗,未报告物质使用障碍的结果。结论:本系统综述显示精神卫生服务的常规实践在一系列物质使用障碍评估和诊断过程中存在显著差异。为了更好地识别物质使用障碍,加强其护理和降低相关发病率,成人精神卫生服务可以从标准化期望和系统监测物质使用评估和诊断的表现中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the official Journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP). The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is a monthly journal publishing original articles which describe research or report opinions of interest to psychiatrists. These contributions may be presented as original research, reviews, perspectives, commentaries and letters to the editor. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry is the leading psychiatry journal of the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信