TMS in major depression: A retrospective naturalistic study including two subjective tools.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Australasian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1177/10398562251314301
Saxby Pridmore, Gregory M Peterson, Marzena Rybak, Karen Byrne, Tae Dillon, Yvonne Turnier-Shea, Ahmed Naguy
{"title":"TMS in major depression: A retrospective naturalistic study including two subjective tools.","authors":"Saxby Pridmore, Gregory M Peterson, Marzena Rybak, Karen Byrne, Tae Dillon, Yvonne Turnier-Shea, Ahmed Naguy","doi":"10.1177/10398562251314301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo report the outcomes of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of patients with acute major depressive disorder (MDD), with particular attention to the performance of the individual assessment tools, including two new subjective mood scales.MethodsPatients with MDD were treated with up to 35 daily TMS sessions. Objective quantification of mood utilised the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S). Subjective quantification was made using the Subjective Depression Scale (SDS6) and a new Daily Emotion Score (DES) - a single question which is asked daily.ResultsNinety consecutive patients (58 females; 64.4%) with a mean age of 46.9 years were included. Using HAM-D6 criteria, 51 patients (56.7%) achieved remission. Scores obtained using the different tools correlated well at the same time point, especially at the conclusion of TMS therapy. The only statistically significant independent predictors of remission were the percentage improvement at session 10 (relative to baseline) in the SDS6 (<i>p</i> = .0026) and in the DES (<i>p</i> = .043).ConclusionThe SDS6 was confirmed as a valuable companion for the HAM-D6. The DES correlated with the other subjective tool (SDS6); the latter, in particular, may also have utility in predicting treatment outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"475-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251314301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo report the outcomes of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment of patients with acute major depressive disorder (MDD), with particular attention to the performance of the individual assessment tools, including two new subjective mood scales.MethodsPatients with MDD were treated with up to 35 daily TMS sessions. Objective quantification of mood utilised the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S). Subjective quantification was made using the Subjective Depression Scale (SDS6) and a new Daily Emotion Score (DES) - a single question which is asked daily.ResultsNinety consecutive patients (58 females; 64.4%) with a mean age of 46.9 years were included. Using HAM-D6 criteria, 51 patients (56.7%) achieved remission. Scores obtained using the different tools correlated well at the same time point, especially at the conclusion of TMS therapy. The only statistically significant independent predictors of remission were the percentage improvement at session 10 (relative to baseline) in the SDS6 (p = .0026) and in the DES (p = .043).ConclusionThe SDS6 was confirmed as a valuable companion for the HAM-D6. The DES correlated with the other subjective tool (SDS6); the latter, in particular, may also have utility in predicting treatment outcome.

经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:一项包括两种主观工具的回顾性自然主义研究。
目的:报告经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗急性重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的结果,并特别关注个体评估工具的表现,包括两个新的主观情绪量表。方法:对重度抑郁症患者进行每日35次经颅磁刺激治疗。使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D6)和临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)对情绪进行客观量化。主观量化使用主观抑郁量表(SDS6)和新的每日情绪评分(DES) -一个每天被问到的单一问题。结果:连续90例患者(女性58例;64.4%),平均年龄46.9岁。采用HAM-D6标准,51例患者(56.7%)获得缓解。使用不同工具获得的评分在同一时间点相关性良好,特别是在TMS治疗结束时。唯一具有统计学意义的缓解独立预测因子是SDS6 (p = 0.0026)和DES (p = 0.043)在第10期(相对于基线)的改善百分比。结论:SDS6是HAM-D6的有价值的伴侣。DES与其他主观工具(SDS6)相关;特别是后者,在预测治疗结果方面也可能有效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信