Effect of core stabilization exercises on cervical sagittal balance parameters in patients with forward head posture: a randomized controlled trial in Egypt.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Shabana, Abeer Farag Hanafy, Ahmad Salamah Yamany, Reda Sayed Ashour
{"title":"Effect of core stabilization exercises on cervical sagittal balance parameters in patients with forward head posture: a randomized controlled trial in Egypt.","authors":"Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Shabana, Abeer Farag Hanafy, Ahmad Salamah Yamany, Reda Sayed Ashour","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial using a pretest-posttest control group design.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the effects of core stabilization exercises (CSEs) on cervical sagittal vertical alignment (cSVA), Cobb's angle, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores in patients with forward head posture (FHP).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>FHP is a local poor neck posture. However, it is frequently caused by sagittal lumbopelvic malalignment. Therefore, an alternative view by which we can begin proximal neuromuscular control is necessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 36 patients with FHP with a mean age of 27±2.63 years. These patients were randomly assigned to the two following groups: experimental group A (n=19), which received CSEs and postural correctional exercises (PCEs), , and control group B (n=17), which received only the PCE program. Randomization was performed using the computer-generated block randomization method. Training was applied 3 times per week and lasted for 6 weeks. Data were collected before and after training using lateral view cervical X-ray and NDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-way mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant improvements in mean cSVA and NDI values after training (p <0.05) in experimental group (A) compared with pre-training values, whereas no significant differences in these values were observed after training in the control group. In contrast, no significant difference in the mean Cobb angle values after training was observed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding CSEs to PCEs is more effective than performing PCEs alone for managing FHP. The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials. gov registry under the registration number NCT06160245.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A randomized controlled trial using a pretest-posttest control group design.

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of core stabilization exercises (CSEs) on cervical sagittal vertical alignment (cSVA), Cobb's angle, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores in patients with forward head posture (FHP).

Overview of literature: FHP is a local poor neck posture. However, it is frequently caused by sagittal lumbopelvic malalignment. Therefore, an alternative view by which we can begin proximal neuromuscular control is necessary.

Methods: This study included 36 patients with FHP with a mean age of 27±2.63 years. These patients were randomly assigned to the two following groups: experimental group A (n=19), which received CSEs and postural correctional exercises (PCEs), , and control group B (n=17), which received only the PCE program. Randomization was performed using the computer-generated block randomization method. Training was applied 3 times per week and lasted for 6 weeks. Data were collected before and after training using lateral view cervical X-ray and NDI.

Results: Two-way mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant improvements in mean cSVA and NDI values after training (p <0.05) in experimental group (A) compared with pre-training values, whereas no significant differences in these values were observed after training in the control group. In contrast, no significant difference in the mean Cobb angle values after training was observed between the groups.

Conclusions: Adding CSEs to PCEs is more effective than performing PCEs alone for managing FHP. The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials. gov registry under the registration number NCT06160245.

核心稳定练习对前头姿势患者颈椎矢状平衡参数的影响:埃及的一项随机对照试验。
研究设计:采用前测后测对照组设计的随机对照试验。目的:本研究探讨了核心稳定练习(CSEs)对前头位(FHP)患者颈椎矢状垂直排列(cSVA)、Cobb角和颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分的影响。文献综述:FHP是颈部局部不良姿势。然而,它通常是由矢状面腰椎骨盆错位引起的。因此,我们需要另一种观点来开始近端神经肌肉控制。方法:本研究纳入36例FHP患者,平均年龄27±2.63岁。这些患者被随机分为两组:实验组A (n=19),接受cse和姿势矫正练习(PCE),对照组B (n=17),只接受PCE项目。采用计算机生成的分组随机化方法进行随机化。每周训练3次,持续6周。在训练前后分别使用侧位子宫颈x线片和NDI收集数据。结果:双向混合设计多变量方差分析显示,训练后平均cSVA和NDI值有显著改善(p)。结论:在pce中加入CSEs比单独进行pce更有效。该试验已在临床试验中注册。注册号码为NCT06160245。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信