Improving detection of monogenic diabetes through reanalysis of GCK variants of uncertain significance.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sunita M C De Sousa, Jennifer M N Phan, Amanda Wells, Kathy H C Wu, Hamish S Scott
{"title":"Improving detection of monogenic diabetes through reanalysis of GCK variants of uncertain significance.","authors":"Sunita M C De Sousa, Jennifer M N Phan, Amanda Wells, Kathy H C Wu, Hamish S Scott","doi":"10.1007/s00592-025-02449-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the utility of reanalysing GCK variants of uncertain significance (VUS) as an intervention to improve the detection of monogenic diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined GCK VUS in a local cohort of individuals with suspected monogenic diabetes and re-curated each variant against the recent ClinGen GCK-specific variant classification guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variant reanalysis achieved a new 'likely pathogenic' classification (i.e., positive results) in 4/8 identified VUS. The single most common newly applied criterion indicating variant pathogenicity was a confirmed phenotype of GCK-hyperglycaemia. RNA sequencing and segregation studies were performed in two cases but not additive to reclassification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first VUS reclassification study in monogenic diabetes using gene-specific guidelines. Within the limits of this small study, we observed a high rate (50%) of VUS upgrades to a positive result, thereby confirming the utility of VUS reanalysis- particularly with biochemical phenotyping- in increasing the detection of monogenic diabetes. We recommend HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and either pancreatic autoantibody negativity or a small oral glucose tolerance test increment as a feasible minimum dataset to inform variant classification at the individual patient level, noting the ongoing work of the ClinGen Monogenic Diabetes Expert Panel in systematically reviewing GCK variants at the international level.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-025-02449-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the utility of reanalysing GCK variants of uncertain significance (VUS) as an intervention to improve the detection of monogenic diabetes.

Methods: We examined GCK VUS in a local cohort of individuals with suspected monogenic diabetes and re-curated each variant against the recent ClinGen GCK-specific variant classification guidelines.

Results: Variant reanalysis achieved a new 'likely pathogenic' classification (i.e., positive results) in 4/8 identified VUS. The single most common newly applied criterion indicating variant pathogenicity was a confirmed phenotype of GCK-hyperglycaemia. RNA sequencing and segregation studies were performed in two cases but not additive to reclassification.

Conclusions: This is the first VUS reclassification study in monogenic diabetes using gene-specific guidelines. Within the limits of this small study, we observed a high rate (50%) of VUS upgrades to a positive result, thereby confirming the utility of VUS reanalysis- particularly with biochemical phenotyping- in increasing the detection of monogenic diabetes. We recommend HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and either pancreatic autoantibody negativity or a small oral glucose tolerance test increment as a feasible minimum dataset to inform variant classification at the individual patient level, noting the ongoing work of the ClinGen Monogenic Diabetes Expert Panel in systematically reviewing GCK variants at the international level.

通过重新分析意义不确定的GCK变异,提高单基因糖尿病的检出率。
目的:评估重新分析不确定意义GCK变异(VUS)作为提高单基因糖尿病检出率的干预措施的效用。方法:我们在一个疑似单基因糖尿病患者的本地队列中检测了GCK VUS,并根据最近的ClinGen GCK特异性变异分类指南对每种变异进行了重新分类。结果:变异再分析在4/8鉴定的VUS中获得了新的“可能致病”分类(即阳性结果)。最新应用的单一最常见的指示变异致病性的标准是确认的gck -高血糖表型。在两个病例中进行了RNA测序和分离研究,但没有添加到重新分类中。结论:这是首个使用基因特异性指南的单基因糖尿病VUS重新分类研究。在这项小型研究的范围内,我们观察到VUS升级为阳性结果的高比率(50%),从而证实了VUS再分析-特别是生化表型分析-在增加单基因糖尿病检测方面的实用性。我们推荐HbA1c、空腹血糖和胰腺自身抗体阴性或少量口服糖耐量试验增量作为可行的最小数据集,以告知个体患者水平的变异分类,并注意到ClinGen单基因糖尿病专家小组正在进行的工作,在国际水平上系统地审查GCK变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信