Mortality and reoperations following treatment of acetabular fractures in patients ≥ 70 years: a retrospective cohort study of 247 patients.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Johan Ljungdahl, Björn Hernefalk, Anna Pallin, Anders Brüggemann, Nils P Hailer, Olof Wolf
{"title":"Mortality and reoperations following treatment of acetabular fractures in patients ≥ 70 years: a retrospective cohort study of 247 patients.","authors":"Johan Ljungdahl, Björn Hernefalk, Anna Pallin, Anders Brüggemann, Nils P Hailer, Olof Wolf","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.42704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> Evidence for long-term outcomes following acetabular fractures in older adults is limited. We aimed to evaluate mortality, complications, and need for subsequent surgical procedures in operatively and nonoperatively treated older patients with acetabular fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥ 70 years with acetabular fractures treated at Uppsala University Hospital between 2010 and 2020 were included. Fractures were classified according to Letournel. Local medical records were analyzed and cross-referenced with the Swedish Arthroplasty Register to identify reoperations and delayed arthroplasty procedures. Follow-up time ranged from 2-12 years. Primary outcome was mortality 1 year after injury. Descriptive statistics, survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method, and logistic regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 247 patients (67% men) with a median age of 80 years (range 70-102) were included. Most patients were ASA class 3 (67%). 148 (60%) patients were treated operatively. The 1-year mortality was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-21) in the operatively and 29% (CI 19-37) in the nonoperatively treated group. Difference in adjusted mortality rates between treatments did not reach statistical significance. 20% of patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) underwent some form of reoperation. In the nonoperatively treated group, 1% had a delayed THA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The 1-year mortality following acetabular fractures in older people was 21% (CI 15-26), underscoring the frailty of this patient group. ORIF alone was associated with a 20% reoperation rate while the rate of delayed surgical treatment in patients selected for nonoperative treatment was 1%.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"94-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.42704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:  Evidence for long-term outcomes following acetabular fractures in older adults is limited. We aimed to evaluate mortality, complications, and need for subsequent surgical procedures in operatively and nonoperatively treated older patients with acetabular fractures.

Methods: Patients aged ≥ 70 years with acetabular fractures treated at Uppsala University Hospital between 2010 and 2020 were included. Fractures were classified according to Letournel. Local medical records were analyzed and cross-referenced with the Swedish Arthroplasty Register to identify reoperations and delayed arthroplasty procedures. Follow-up time ranged from 2-12 years. Primary outcome was mortality 1 year after injury. Descriptive statistics, survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method, and logistic regression models were used.

Results:  247 patients (67% men) with a median age of 80 years (range 70-102) were included. Most patients were ASA class 3 (67%). 148 (60%) patients were treated operatively. The 1-year mortality was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-21) in the operatively and 29% (CI 19-37) in the nonoperatively treated group. Difference in adjusted mortality rates between treatments did not reach statistical significance. 20% of patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) underwent some form of reoperation. In the nonoperatively treated group, 1% had a delayed THA.

Conclusion:  The 1-year mortality following acetabular fractures in older people was 21% (CI 15-26), underscoring the frailty of this patient group. ORIF alone was associated with a 20% reoperation rate while the rate of delayed surgical treatment in patients selected for nonoperative treatment was 1%.

≥70岁患者髋臼骨折治疗后的死亡率和再手术:247例患者的回顾性队列研究
背景和目的:老年人髋臼骨折后长期预后的证据有限。我们的目的是评估老年髋臼骨折患者手术和非手术治疗的死亡率、并发症和后续手术的必要性。方法:选取2010 - 2020年在乌普萨拉大学医院治疗的年龄≥70岁的髋臼骨折患者。骨折按照Letournel分类。对当地医疗记录进行分析,并与瑞典关节成形术登记册进行交叉对照,以确定再手术和延迟的关节成形术。随访时间为2-12年。主要终点是损伤后1年的死亡率。采用描述性统计、Kaplan-Meier法生存分析和logistic回归模型。结果:纳入247例患者(67%男性),中位年龄为80岁(范围70-102岁)。大多数患者为ASA 3级(67%)。148例(60%)患者接受手术治疗。手术组1年死亡率为15%(95%可信区间[CI] 9-21),非手术组为29% (CI 19-37)。两组校正死亡率差异无统计学意义。20%接受切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗的患者进行了某种形式的再手术。在非手术治疗组中,1%有延迟THA。结论:老年人髋臼骨折后1年死亡率为21% (CI 15-26),强调了该患者组的脆弱性。单独ORIF与20%的再手术率相关,而选择非手术治疗的患者延迟手术治疗率为1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信