Comparing field and lab quantitative stable isotope probing for nitrogen assimilation in soil microbes.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Kinsey Reed, Chansotheary Dang, Jeth Walkup, Alicia Purcell, Bruce Hungate, Ember Morrissey
{"title":"Comparing field and lab quantitative stable isotope probing for nitrogen assimilation in soil microbes.","authors":"Kinsey Reed, Chansotheary Dang, Jeth Walkup, Alicia Purcell, Bruce Hungate, Ember Morrissey","doi":"10.1128/aem.01849-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil microbial communities play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and can help retain nitrogen in agricultural soils. Quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) is a useful method for investigating taxon-specific microbial growth and utilization of specific nutrients, such as nitrogen (N). Typically, qSIP is performed in a highly controlled lab setting, so the field relevance of lab qSIP studies remains unknown. We conducted and compared tandem lab and field qSIP to quantify the assimilation of <sup>15</sup>N by maize-associated soil prokaryotic communities at two agricultural sites. Here, we show that field qSIP with <sup>15</sup>N can be used to measure taxon-specific microbial N assimilation. Relative <sup>15</sup>N assimilation rates were generally lower in the field, and the magnitude of this difference varied by site. Rates differed by method (lab vs field) for 19% of the top N assimilating genera. The field and lab measures were more comparable when relative assimilation rates were weighted by relative abundance to estimate the proportion of N assimilated by each genus with only ~10% of taxa differing by method. Of those that differed, the taxa consistently higher in the lab were inclined to have opportunistic lifestyle strategies, whereas those higher in the field had niches reliant on plant roots or in-tact soil structure (biofilms, mycelia). This study demonstrates that <sup>15</sup>N-qSIP can be successfully performed using field-incubated soils to identify microbial allies in N retention and highlights the strengths and limitations of field and lab qSIP approaches.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Soil microbes are responsible for critical biogeochemical processes in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Despite their importance, the functional traits of most soil organisms remain woefully under-characterized, limiting our ability to understand how microbial populations influence the transformation of elements such as nitrogen (N) in soil. Quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) is a powerful tool to measure the traits of individual taxa. This method has rarely been applied in the field or with <sup>15</sup>N to measure nitrogen assimilation. In this study, we measured genus-specific microbial nitrogen assimilation in two agricultural soils and compared field and lab <sup>15</sup>N qSIP methods. Our results identify taxa important for nitrogen assimilation in agricultural soils, shed light on the field relevance of lab qSIP studies, and provide guidance for the future application of qSIP to measure microbial traits in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":8002,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0184924"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01849-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil microbial communities play crucial roles in nutrient cycling and can help retain nitrogen in agricultural soils. Quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) is a useful method for investigating taxon-specific microbial growth and utilization of specific nutrients, such as nitrogen (N). Typically, qSIP is performed in a highly controlled lab setting, so the field relevance of lab qSIP studies remains unknown. We conducted and compared tandem lab and field qSIP to quantify the assimilation of 15N by maize-associated soil prokaryotic communities at two agricultural sites. Here, we show that field qSIP with 15N can be used to measure taxon-specific microbial N assimilation. Relative 15N assimilation rates were generally lower in the field, and the magnitude of this difference varied by site. Rates differed by method (lab vs field) for 19% of the top N assimilating genera. The field and lab measures were more comparable when relative assimilation rates were weighted by relative abundance to estimate the proportion of N assimilated by each genus with only ~10% of taxa differing by method. Of those that differed, the taxa consistently higher in the lab were inclined to have opportunistic lifestyle strategies, whereas those higher in the field had niches reliant on plant roots or in-tact soil structure (biofilms, mycelia). This study demonstrates that 15N-qSIP can be successfully performed using field-incubated soils to identify microbial allies in N retention and highlights the strengths and limitations of field and lab qSIP approaches.

Importance: Soil microbes are responsible for critical biogeochemical processes in natural and agricultural ecosystems. Despite their importance, the functional traits of most soil organisms remain woefully under-characterized, limiting our ability to understand how microbial populations influence the transformation of elements such as nitrogen (N) in soil. Quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) is a powerful tool to measure the traits of individual taxa. This method has rarely been applied in the field or with 15N to measure nitrogen assimilation. In this study, we measured genus-specific microbial nitrogen assimilation in two agricultural soils and compared field and lab 15N qSIP methods. Our results identify taxa important for nitrogen assimilation in agricultural soils, shed light on the field relevance of lab qSIP studies, and provide guidance for the future application of qSIP to measure microbial traits in the field.

土壤微生物氮同化定量稳定同位素探测的野外与室内比较。
土壤微生物群落在养分循环中起着至关重要的作用,可以帮助农业土壤保持氮。定量稳定同位素探测(qSIP)是研究分类群特定微生物生长和特定营养物质(如氮)利用的一种有用方法。通常,qSIP是在高度控制的实验室环境中进行的,因此实验室qSIP研究的实地相关性尚不清楚。为了量化两个农业基地玉米相关土壤原核群落对15N的同化,我们采用了实验室和田间qSIP串联方法,并进行了比较。本研究表明,15N的qSIP可以用于测量分类群特异性微生物氮同化。田间15N的相对同化速率普遍较低,且差异程度因地而异。19%的顶端氮同化属在不同方法(实验室与田间)中存在差异。当相对同化率以相对丰度加权来估计各属同化氮的比例时,现场测量和实验室测量结果更具可比性,只有~10%的分类群采用不同的方法。在这些不同的分类群中,实验室中较高的分类群倾向于机会主义的生活方式策略,而野外较高的分类群则依赖于植物根系或完整的土壤结构(生物膜,菌丝)。本研究表明,15N-qSIP可以成功地在田间培养的土壤中进行,以确定微生物在N保留中的盟友,并突出了田间和实验室qSIP方法的优势和局限性。重要性:土壤微生物在自然和农业生态系统中负责关键的生物地球化学过程。尽管它们很重要,但大多数土壤生物的功能特征仍然很不清楚,这限制了我们理解微生物种群如何影响土壤中氮(N)等元素的转化。定量稳定同位素探测(qSIP)是测量单个分类群特征的有力工具。这种方法很少在田间或15N条件下用于测定氮素同化。在本研究中,我们测量了两种农业土壤中属特异性微生物氮同化,并比较了田间和实验室15N qSIP方法。本研究确定了农业土壤氮同化的重要类群,阐明了实验室qSIP研究的野外相关性,并为qSIP在田间微生物性状测量中的应用提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
730
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes papers that make significant contributions to (a) applied microbiology, including biotechnology, protein engineering, bioremediation, and food microbiology, (b) microbial ecology, including environmental, organismic, and genomic microbiology, and (c) interdisciplinary microbiology, including invertebrate microbiology, plant microbiology, aquatic microbiology, and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信