Pressure Protein Denaturation Compared to Thermal and Chemical Unfolding: Analyses with Cooperative Models.

IF 2.8 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B Pub Date : 2025-01-30 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c07703
Joachim Seelig, Anna Seelig
{"title":"Pressure Protein Denaturation Compared to Thermal and Chemical Unfolding: Analyses with Cooperative Models.","authors":"Joachim Seelig, Anna Seelig","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c07703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The thermodynamics of pressure-induced protein denaturation could so far not be directly compared with protein denaturation induced by temperature or chemical agents. Here, we provide a new cooperative model for pressure-induced protein denaturation that allows the quantitative comparison of all three denaturing processes based on their free energy, enthalpy, entropy, and cooperativity. As model proteins, we use apolipoprotein A-1 and lysozyme. The comparison shows that heat-induced unfolding is the most cooperative process. It is characterized by large positive enthalpies and entropies and (due to enthalpy-entropy compensation) small negative free energies. Pressure denaturation is less cooperative. The entropies and enthalpies are less positive, and the resulting free energies are more negative. Chemically induced unfolding is the least cooperative and shows the most negative free energies, in particular, if guanidinium hydrochloride (exhibiting a high binding affinity to certain proteins) is used as a denaturant. The three unfolding processes differ not only with respect to their cooperativity and the thermodynamic parameters but also with respect to the volume changes, suggesting structural differences of the denatured proteins. Using cooperative models thus yields significant new insights into the protein unfolding/folding processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":60,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","volume":" ","pages":"1229-1236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c07703","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thermodynamics of pressure-induced protein denaturation could so far not be directly compared with protein denaturation induced by temperature or chemical agents. Here, we provide a new cooperative model for pressure-induced protein denaturation that allows the quantitative comparison of all three denaturing processes based on their free energy, enthalpy, entropy, and cooperativity. As model proteins, we use apolipoprotein A-1 and lysozyme. The comparison shows that heat-induced unfolding is the most cooperative process. It is characterized by large positive enthalpies and entropies and (due to enthalpy-entropy compensation) small negative free energies. Pressure denaturation is less cooperative. The entropies and enthalpies are less positive, and the resulting free energies are more negative. Chemically induced unfolding is the least cooperative and shows the most negative free energies, in particular, if guanidinium hydrochloride (exhibiting a high binding affinity to certain proteins) is used as a denaturant. The three unfolding processes differ not only with respect to their cooperativity and the thermodynamic parameters but also with respect to the volume changes, suggesting structural differences of the denatured proteins. Using cooperative models thus yields significant new insights into the protein unfolding/folding processes.

与热和化学展开相比,压力蛋白质变性:用合作模型分析。
压力引起的蛋白质变性的热力学至今还不能与温度或化学试剂引起的蛋白质变性直接比较。在这里,我们为压力诱导的蛋白质变性提供了一个新的协同模型,该模型允许基于自由能、焓、熵和协同性对所有三种变性过程进行定量比较。我们使用载脂蛋白A-1和溶菌酶作为模型蛋白。结果表明,热诱导展开是最具协同性的过程。它的特点是大的正焓和熵和(由于焓熵补偿)小的负自由能。压力变性不太配合。熵和焓的正数更少,而自由能的正数更少。化学诱导展开是最不合作的,并显示出最大的负自由能,特别是,如果盐酸胍(表现出对某些蛋白质的高结合亲和力)用作变性剂。这三种展开过程不仅在协同性和热力学参数方面存在差异,而且在体积变化方面也存在差异,这表明变性蛋白质的结构存在差异。因此,使用合作模型对蛋白质展开/折叠过程产生了重要的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
965
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An essential criterion for acceptance of research articles in the journal is that they provide new physical insight. Please refer to the New Physical Insights virtual issue on what constitutes new physical insight. Manuscripts that are essentially reporting data or applications of data are, in general, not suitable for publication in JPC B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信