David A Cooper, Joseph DePaolo-Boisvert, Stanley A Nicholson, Barien Gad, David D L Minh
{"title":"Intracellular Pocket Conformations Determine Signaling Efficacy through the μ Opioid Receptor.","authors":"David A Cooper, Joseph DePaolo-Boisvert, Stanley A Nicholson, Barien Gad, David D L Minh","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been challenging to determine how a ligand that binds to a receptor activates downstream signaling pathways and to predict the strength of signaling. The challenge is compounded by functional selectivity, in which a single ligand binding to a single receptor can activate multiple signaling pathways at different levels. Spectroscopic studies show that in the largest class of cell surface receptors, 7 transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), activation is associated with ligand-induced shifts in the equilibria of intracellular pocket conformations in the absence of transducer proteins. We hypothesized that signaling through the μ opioid receptor, a prototypical 7TMR, is linearly proportional to the equilibrium probability of observing intracellular pocket conformations in the receptor-ligand complex. Here, we show that a machine learning model based on this hypothesis accurately calculates the efficacy of both G protein and β-arrestin-2 signaling. Structural features that the model associates with activation are intracellular pocket expansion, toggle switch rotation, and sodium binding pocket collapse. Distinct pathways are activated by different arrangements of the ligand and sodium binding pockets and the intracellular pocket. While recent work has categorized ligands as active or inactive (or partially active) based on binding affinities to two conformations, our approach accurately computes signaling efficacy along multiple pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":" ","pages":"1465-1475"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01437","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It has been challenging to determine how a ligand that binds to a receptor activates downstream signaling pathways and to predict the strength of signaling. The challenge is compounded by functional selectivity, in which a single ligand binding to a single receptor can activate multiple signaling pathways at different levels. Spectroscopic studies show that in the largest class of cell surface receptors, 7 transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), activation is associated with ligand-induced shifts in the equilibria of intracellular pocket conformations in the absence of transducer proteins. We hypothesized that signaling through the μ opioid receptor, a prototypical 7TMR, is linearly proportional to the equilibrium probability of observing intracellular pocket conformations in the receptor-ligand complex. Here, we show that a machine learning model based on this hypothesis accurately calculates the efficacy of both G protein and β-arrestin-2 signaling. Structural features that the model associates with activation are intracellular pocket expansion, toggle switch rotation, and sodium binding pocket collapse. Distinct pathways are activated by different arrangements of the ligand and sodium binding pockets and the intracellular pocket. While recent work has categorized ligands as active or inactive (or partially active) based on binding affinities to two conformations, our approach accurately computes signaling efficacy along multiple pathways.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery.
Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field.
As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.