Integrating machine learning in digital architecture: enhancing sustainable design and energy efficiency in urban environments

Q2 Engineering
Ma’in F. Abu-Shaikha, Mutasem A. Al-Karablieh, Akram M. Musa, Maryam I. Almashayikh, Razan Y. Al-Abed
{"title":"Integrating machine learning in digital architecture: enhancing sustainable design and energy efficiency in urban environments","authors":"Ma’in F. Abu-Shaikha,&nbsp;Mutasem A. Al-Karablieh,&nbsp;Akram M. Musa,&nbsp;Maryam I. Almashayikh,&nbsp;Razan Y. Al-Abed","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01224-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The following work applies metaheuristic optimization algorithms—PSO, ACO, Genetic Algorithm, and Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization (ECBO)—to the optimum design of a sustainable building with respect to prominent metrics such as energy savings, improvement in indoor comfort, and reduction in carbon footprint. These algorithms are applied to a wide dataset that includes variable intensity factors such as window-to-wall variation ratio, HVAC efficiency, and integration of renewable energy. Results also proved that PSO is the fittest strategy to balance energy efficiency and sustainability, with the highest energy savings of 24.1%. Besides, PSO wasn’t just the fastest convergence rate; it also obtained a Platinum LEED certification. ACO was second in order of magnitude, with high energy savings and carbon footprint reduction values, and also obtained the Platinum LEED certificate. The results obtained for GA were positive from the occupant comfort point of view but were slower in terms of energy savings and convergence speed. In contrast, ECBO had the slowest convergence and lowest energy savings, demonstrating the limitation of the application of ECBO for large-scale multi-objective optimization. These results imply that PSO and ACO would be suitable for practical applications linked to urban sustainable design, while GA and ECBO are more suited for niche applications. The obtained results can provide useful guidelines in developing more energy-efficient and sustainable designs for architects, urban planners, and policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 2","pages":"813 - 827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01224-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following work applies metaheuristic optimization algorithms—PSO, ACO, Genetic Algorithm, and Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization (ECBO)—to the optimum design of a sustainable building with respect to prominent metrics such as energy savings, improvement in indoor comfort, and reduction in carbon footprint. These algorithms are applied to a wide dataset that includes variable intensity factors such as window-to-wall variation ratio, HVAC efficiency, and integration of renewable energy. Results also proved that PSO is the fittest strategy to balance energy efficiency and sustainability, with the highest energy savings of 24.1%. Besides, PSO wasn’t just the fastest convergence rate; it also obtained a Platinum LEED certification. ACO was second in order of magnitude, with high energy savings and carbon footprint reduction values, and also obtained the Platinum LEED certificate. The results obtained for GA were positive from the occupant comfort point of view but were slower in terms of energy savings and convergence speed. In contrast, ECBO had the slowest convergence and lowest energy savings, demonstrating the limitation of the application of ECBO for large-scale multi-objective optimization. These results imply that PSO and ACO would be suitable for practical applications linked to urban sustainable design, while GA and ECBO are more suited for niche applications. The obtained results can provide useful guidelines in developing more energy-efficient and sustainable designs for architects, urban planners, and policymakers.

在数字建筑中集成机器学习:增强城市环境中的可持续设计和能源效率
下面的工作将元启发式优化算法——粒子群算法、蚁群算法、遗传算法和增强碰撞体优化(ECBO)——应用于可持续建筑的优化设计,包括节能、改善室内舒适度和减少碳足迹等重要指标。这些算法应用于一个广泛的数据集,其中包括可变强度因素,如窗墙变化率、暖通空调效率和可再生能源的整合。结果还证明,PSO是平衡能源效率和可持续性的最合适的策略,最高节能24.1%。此外,粒子群算法不仅收敛速度最快;它还获得了LEED白金认证。ACO排名第二,具有很高的节能和减少碳足迹的价值,并获得了LEED白金证书。从乘员舒适度的角度来看,GA的结果是积极的,但在节能和收敛速度方面则较慢。相比之下,ECBO的收敛速度最慢,节能效果最低,表明了ECBO在大规模多目标优化中应用的局限性。这些结果表明,粒子群算法和蚁群算法更适合与城市可持续设计相关的实际应用,而遗传算法和ECBO算法更适合于小众应用。获得的结果可以为建筑师、城市规划者和政策制定者提供有用的指导方针,以开发更节能和可持续的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信