On Possible Additional Sources of Solar Protons in the Events of September 4–10, 2017

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
I. Yu. Grigor’eva, V. A. Ozheredov, A. B. Struminsky
{"title":"On Possible Additional Sources of Solar Protons in the Events of September 4–10, 2017","authors":"I. Yu. Grigor’eva,&nbsp;V. A. Ozheredov,&nbsp;A. B. Struminsky","doi":"10.1134/S0016793224700221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article considers the period from September 4 to September 10, 2017, inclusive, during which the last proton events of solar cycle 24 occurred. In order to detect possible additional proton sources and verify the sources already listed in various catalogs, we apply an empirical method for predicting proton events to all solar flares detected during this period. It is based on the threshold criteria of the parent flares. In addition, we apply an algorithm for automatic search of proton flares obtained by machine learning. Two variants of the automatic search algorithm are used: the first one (method 319) does not take into account the duration of the radio emission, while the second one (method 189) imposes a condition on its duration (&gt;2 min). The empirical method shows that, except for the source flares found by the time of the first arrival of solar protons on Earth, other flares of this period do not fulfill all the criteria of “protonicity.” An additional test of the automatic method is the detection of proton flares that we selected by the protonicity criteria but that did not make it to the training sample. Method 319 considers proton flares X9.3 on September 6, 2017, M1.4 and X1.3 on September 7, 2017, and C8.3 on September 8, 2017, as proton flares. Method 189 does not consider the flares of September 7 and 8, 2017, as credible proton sources, which is consistent with expert empirical estimates of the protonicity criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":55597,"journal":{"name":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","volume":"64 7","pages":"1148 - 1156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793224700221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the period from September 4 to September 10, 2017, inclusive, during which the last proton events of solar cycle 24 occurred. In order to detect possible additional proton sources and verify the sources already listed in various catalogs, we apply an empirical method for predicting proton events to all solar flares detected during this period. It is based on the threshold criteria of the parent flares. In addition, we apply an algorithm for automatic search of proton flares obtained by machine learning. Two variants of the automatic search algorithm are used: the first one (method 319) does not take into account the duration of the radio emission, while the second one (method 189) imposes a condition on its duration (>2 min). The empirical method shows that, except for the source flares found by the time of the first arrival of solar protons on Earth, other flares of this period do not fulfill all the criteria of “protonicity.” An additional test of the automatic method is the detection of proton flares that we selected by the protonicity criteria but that did not make it to the training sample. Method 319 considers proton flares X9.3 on September 6, 2017, M1.4 and X1.3 on September 7, 2017, and C8.3 on September 8, 2017, as proton flares. Method 189 does not consider the flares of September 7 and 8, 2017, as credible proton sources, which is consistent with expert empirical estimates of the protonicity criteria.

Abstract Image

2017年9月4-10日事件中太阳质子可能的额外来源
本文考虑了2017年9月4日至9月10日(含),在此期间发生了第24太阳周期的最后一次质子事件。为了发现可能的额外质子源并验证各种目录中已经列出的来源,我们应用经验方法预测质子事件,以预测在此期间检测到的所有太阳耀斑。它是基于母耀斑的阈值标准。此外,我们还应用了一种由机器学习得到的质子耀斑的自动搜索算法。使用自动搜索算法的两种变体:第一种(方法319)不考虑无线电发射的持续时间,而第二种(方法189)对其持续时间(2分钟)施加条件。经验方法表明,除了在太阳质子第一次到达地球时发现的源耀斑外,这一时期的其他耀斑都不符合“质子性”的所有标准。自动方法的另一个测试是检测质子耀斑,我们根据质子度标准选择,但没有使其进入训练样本。方法319将2017年9月6日的X9.3、2017年9月7日的M1.4和X1.3以及2017年9月8日的C8.3质子耀斑视为质子耀斑。方法189不认为2017年9月7日和8日的耀斑是可信的质子源,这与专家对质子度标准的经验估计一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a bimonthly periodical that covers the fields of interplanetary space; geoeffective solar events; the magnetosphere; the ionosphere; the upper and middle atmosphere; the action of solar variability and activity on atmospheric parameters and climate; the main magnetic field and its secular variations, excursion, and inversion; and other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信