Gravitational wave luminosity distance for Starobinsky gravity in viscous cosmological models

IF 4.2 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS
Jia-nan Chi, Ya-Bo Wu, Yu Sang, Xue Zhang, Yi-liang Hu, Wen-zhong Liu, Bo-hai Chen
{"title":"Gravitational wave luminosity distance for Starobinsky gravity in viscous cosmological models","authors":"Jia-nan Chi,&nbsp;Ya-Bo Wu,&nbsp;Yu Sang,&nbsp;Xue Zhang,&nbsp;Yi-liang Hu,&nbsp;Wen-zhong Liu,&nbsp;Bo-hai Chen","doi":"10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13564-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, in the Starobinsky gravity (SG) model, the gravitational wave (GW) luminosity distance <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)\\)</span> is analytically and numerically investigated by considering the dark matter as the two different kinds of shear viscous fluids in universe. Concretely, on the basis of the propagation equation of the metric perturbation derived by using transverse-traceless gauge for the linear perturbation of the metric in FRW background, we obtain the analytical expressions of the modified friction term <span>\\(\\delta (z)\\)</span> and the ratio <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\\)</span> of GW to electromagnetic (EM) wave luminosity distance, and find that they only depend on the SG model parameter <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span> and the shear viscous coefficient <span>\\(\\eta \\)</span>, regardless of the bulk viscous coefficient <span>\\(\\zeta \\)</span>. Evidently, both of them are affected by <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span> and <span>\\(\\eta \\)</span>. It worth stressing that the results given by us can reduce to ones in documents [13, 22, 30]. It follows that we can extend the previous results as the special cases in our model. Furthermore, by combining the latest observational data, we more tightly constrain the values of related parameters and numerically analyze the influence of both <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span> and <span>\\(\\eta \\)</span> on <span>\\(\\delta (z)\\)</span> and <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\\)</span>. We observe that, in the range of <span>\\(0&lt; z\\le 8.2\\)</span>, the evolutionary curves of <span>\\(\\delta (z)\\)</span> and <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\\)</span> exhibit that <span>\\(\\delta (z)\\)</span> (<span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\\)</span>) monotonically decrease (increase) as redshift rises, moreover there are always <span>\\(\\delta (z)&lt;0\\)</span> and <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)\\ge d_L^{EM}(z)\\)</span>, specially <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(0)=d_L^{EM}(0)\\)</span> in the limit of <span>\\(z\\rightarrow 0\\)</span>, which means that detecting GW signals might represent a more efficient tool than detecting EM signals to test modified gravity model on the given scale of cosmic distances. It is worth noting that the numerical analyses to <span>\\(\\delta (z)\\)</span> and <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\\)</span> illustrate once again that the GW luminosity distance <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)\\)</span> is indeed influenced by <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span> and <span>\\(\\eta \\)</span>, in particular more sensitive to <span>\\(\\alpha \\)</span> than <span>\\(\\eta \\)</span> in our model. In addition, by comparing the GW and EM luminosity distances of SG model with <span>\\(d_{L(GR)}\\)</span> of Einstein GR, we find that the GW and EM signals in SG1 and SG2 change from stronger to weaker than the ones in GR as redshift increases and more difficultly to be detected in the same distance and detection sensitivity. Meanwhile, the EM signals change from strong to weak earlier than GW signals do. Finally, we confirm that <span>\\(\\delta (z)\\)</span> and <span>\\(d_L^{GW}(z)\\)</span> of our model meet the constraints imposed by the standard siren GW170817 and its electromagnetic companion GRB170817A.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":788,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal C","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13564-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal C","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13564-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, in the Starobinsky gravity (SG) model, the gravitational wave (GW) luminosity distance \(d_L^{GW}(z)\) is analytically and numerically investigated by considering the dark matter as the two different kinds of shear viscous fluids in universe. Concretely, on the basis of the propagation equation of the metric perturbation derived by using transverse-traceless gauge for the linear perturbation of the metric in FRW background, we obtain the analytical expressions of the modified friction term \(\delta (z)\) and the ratio \(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\) of GW to electromagnetic (EM) wave luminosity distance, and find that they only depend on the SG model parameter \(\alpha \) and the shear viscous coefficient \(\eta \), regardless of the bulk viscous coefficient \(\zeta \). Evidently, both of them are affected by \(\alpha \) and \(\eta \). It worth stressing that the results given by us can reduce to ones in documents [13, 22, 30]. It follows that we can extend the previous results as the special cases in our model. Furthermore, by combining the latest observational data, we more tightly constrain the values of related parameters and numerically analyze the influence of both \(\alpha \) and \(\eta \) on \(\delta (z)\) and \(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\). We observe that, in the range of \(0< z\le 8.2\), the evolutionary curves of \(\delta (z)\) and \(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\) exhibit that \(\delta (z)\) (\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\)) monotonically decrease (increase) as redshift rises, moreover there are always \(\delta (z)<0\) and \(d_L^{GW}(z)\ge d_L^{EM}(z)\), specially \(d_L^{GW}(0)=d_L^{EM}(0)\) in the limit of \(z\rightarrow 0\), which means that detecting GW signals might represent a more efficient tool than detecting EM signals to test modified gravity model on the given scale of cosmic distances. It is worth noting that the numerical analyses to \(\delta (z)\) and \(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\) illustrate once again that the GW luminosity distance \(d_L^{GW}(z)\) is indeed influenced by \(\alpha \) and \(\eta \), in particular more sensitive to \(\alpha \) than \(\eta \) in our model. In addition, by comparing the GW and EM luminosity distances of SG model with \(d_{L(GR)}\) of Einstein GR, we find that the GW and EM signals in SG1 and SG2 change from stronger to weaker than the ones in GR as redshift increases and more difficultly to be detected in the same distance and detection sensitivity. Meanwhile, the EM signals change from strong to weak earlier than GW signals do. Finally, we confirm that \(\delta (z)\) and \(d_L^{GW}(z)\) of our model meet the constraints imposed by the standard siren GW170817 and its electromagnetic companion GRB170817A.

粘性宇宙学模型中Starobinsky引力的引力波光度距离
本文在Starobinsky重力(SG)模型中,将暗物质视为宇宙中两种不同的剪切粘性流体,对引力波(GW)光度距离\(d_L^{GW}(z)\)进行了解析和数值研究。具体而言,基于FRW背景下利用横向无迹规得到的度规线性摄动的传播方程,得到了修正摩擦项\(\delta (z)\)和GW与电磁波发光距离的比值\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\)的解析表达式,发现它们只依赖于SG模型参数\(\alpha \)和剪切粘性系数\(\eta \);不管体积粘滞系数\(\zeta \)。显然,它们都受到\(\alpha \)和\(\eta \)的影响。值得强调的是,我们给出的结果可以约简为文献[13,22,30]中的1。因此,我们可以将前面的结果扩展为模型中的特殊情况。结合最新观测资料,对相关参数的取值进行了更严格的约束,并对\(\alpha \)和\(\eta \)对\(\delta (z)\)和\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\)的影响进行了数值分析。我们观察到,在\(0< z\le 8.2\)范围内,\(\delta (z)\)和\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\)的演化曲线表现为随着红移的增加,\(\delta (z)\) (\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\))单调减小(增加),并且始终存在\(\delta (z)<0\)和\(d_L^{GW}(z)\ge d_L^{EM}(z)\),特别是\(z\rightarrow 0\)范围内的\(d_L^{GW}(0)=d_L^{EM}(0)\);这意味着探测GW信号可能比探测EM信号更有效,可以在给定的宇宙距离尺度上测试修正的引力模型。值得注意的是,对\(\delta (z)\)和\(d_L^{GW}(z)/d_L^{EM}(z)\)的数值分析再次表明,GW光度距离\(d_L^{GW}(z)\)确实受到\(\alpha \)和\(\eta \)的影响,特别是在我们的模型中对\(\alpha \)比\(\eta \)更敏感。此外,将SG模型的GW和EM光度距离与Einstein GR的\(d_{L(GR)}\)进行比较,我们发现随着红移的增加,SG1和SG2中的GW和EM信号比GR中的信号由强到弱,在相同的距离和探测灵敏度下更难被探测到。同时,电磁信号由强变弱的时间要早于毫米波信号。最后,我们证实了模型的\(\delta (z)\)和\(d_L^{GW}(z)\)满足标准警笛GW170817及其电磁伴星GRB170817A的约束条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal C
The European Physical Journal C 物理-物理:粒子与场物理
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
15.90%
发文量
1008
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental Physics I: Accelerator Based High-Energy Physics Hadron and lepton collider physics Lepton-nucleon scattering High-energy nuclear reactions Standard model precision tests Search for new physics beyond the standard model Heavy flavour physics Neutrino properties Particle detector developments Computational methods and analysis tools Experimental Physics II: Astroparticle Physics Dark matter searches High-energy cosmic rays Double beta decay Long baseline neutrino experiments Neutrino astronomy Axions and other weakly interacting light particles Gravitational waves and observational cosmology Particle detector developments Computational methods and analysis tools Theoretical Physics I: Phenomenology of the Standard Model and Beyond Electroweak interactions Quantum chromo dynamics Heavy quark physics and quark flavour mixing Neutrino physics Phenomenology of astro- and cosmoparticle physics Meson spectroscopy and non-perturbative QCD Low-energy effective field theories Lattice field theory High temperature QCD and heavy ion physics Phenomenology of supersymmetric extensions of the SM Phenomenology of non-supersymmetric extensions of the SM Model building and alternative models of electroweak symmetry breaking Flavour physics beyond the SM Computational algorithms and tools...etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信