Normothermic Liver Machine Perfusion At a Large European Center -Real World Outcomes Following 238 Applications.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Felix J Krendl,Benno Cardini,Margot Fodor,Jessica Singh,Florian Ponholzer,Franka Messner,Annemarie Weissenbacher,Thomas Resch,Manuel Maglione,Christian Margreiter,Stephan Eschertzhuber,Christian Irsara,Andrea Griesmacher,Harald Schennach,Robert Breitkopf,Lisa Schlosser,Heinz Zoller,Herbert Tilg,Rupert Oberhuber,Stefan Schneeberger
{"title":"Normothermic Liver Machine Perfusion At a Large European Center -Real World Outcomes Following 238 Applications.","authors":"Felix J Krendl,Benno Cardini,Margot Fodor,Jessica Singh,Florian Ponholzer,Franka Messner,Annemarie Weissenbacher,Thomas Resch,Manuel Maglione,Christian Margreiter,Stephan Eschertzhuber,Christian Irsara,Andrea Griesmacher,Harald Schennach,Robert Breitkopf,Lisa Schlosser,Heinz Zoller,Herbert Tilg,Rupert Oberhuber,Stefan Schneeberger","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo report outcomes from routine clinical practice of liver transplantation (LT) following normothermic liver machine perfusion (NLMP) and compare to LT after static cold storage (SCS).\r\n\r\nBACKGROUND\r\nNLMP is emerging as a clinical routine in LT as has recently received renewed attention, however outcomes outside of clinical trials are lacking.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll adult LT between February 2018 and January 2023 were included. Comprehensive viability assessment was applied during NLMP. Outcomes were compared between NLMP and SCS recipients, as well as benchmark and non-benchmark cases.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 332 LT included, 174 underwent NLMP and 158 were transplanted following SCS. Sixty-seven organs were accepted and transplanted only under the premise of NLMP. One-year graft survival for SCS and NLMP recipients was 83.8% vs. 81.3% and 93.4% for benchmark cases in the overall cohort. Total preservation time had no influence on graft survival in the NLMP group but was associated with inferior 1-year graft survival in the SCS group. NLMP usage increased significantly over the duration of the study period, as did the median total preservation time. With increasing NLMP use and longer preservation times, nighttime surgery decreased significantly from 41.9% to 4.2%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nProlonged preservation times ease logistics and enable daytime surgery. The possibility of NLMP offers to expand liver transplantation without negatively affecting outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To report outcomes from routine clinical practice of liver transplantation (LT) following normothermic liver machine perfusion (NLMP) and compare to LT after static cold storage (SCS). BACKGROUND NLMP is emerging as a clinical routine in LT as has recently received renewed attention, however outcomes outside of clinical trials are lacking. METHODS All adult LT between February 2018 and January 2023 were included. Comprehensive viability assessment was applied during NLMP. Outcomes were compared between NLMP and SCS recipients, as well as benchmark and non-benchmark cases. RESULTS Of the 332 LT included, 174 underwent NLMP and 158 were transplanted following SCS. Sixty-seven organs were accepted and transplanted only under the premise of NLMP. One-year graft survival for SCS and NLMP recipients was 83.8% vs. 81.3% and 93.4% for benchmark cases in the overall cohort. Total preservation time had no influence on graft survival in the NLMP group but was associated with inferior 1-year graft survival in the SCS group. NLMP usage increased significantly over the duration of the study period, as did the median total preservation time. With increasing NLMP use and longer preservation times, nighttime surgery decreased significantly from 41.9% to 4.2%. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged preservation times ease logistics and enable daytime surgery. The possibility of NLMP offers to expand liver transplantation without negatively affecting outcomes.
大型欧洲中心的恒温肝机灌注- 238例应用后的真实世界结果。
目的报告常规肝机灌注(NLMP)后肝移植(LT)的临床效果,并与静态冷藏(SCS)后肝移植(LT)进行比较。nlmp正在成为肝移植的临床常规,最近受到了新的关注,然而临床试验之外的结果缺乏。方法纳入2018年2月至2023年1月期间所有成人LT。NLMP期间采用综合生存力评价。比较NLMP和SCS受体以及基准和非基准病例的结果。结果332例肝移植中,174例行NLMP, 158例行SCS后移植。仅在NLMP前提下接受移植的器官就达67例。在整个队列中,SCS和NLMP受体的一年移植存活率为83.8%,而基准病例为81.3%和93.4%。NLMP组总保存时间对移植物存活无影响,但与SCS组较差的1年移植物存活相关。NLMP的使用在研究期间显著增加,中位总保存时间也增加了。随着NLMP使用的增加和保存时间的延长,夜间手术从41.9%显著下降到4.2%。结论延长保存时间,简化了后勤工作,便于日间手术。NLMP提供了扩大肝移植的可能性,而不会对结果产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信