{"title":"Normothermic Liver Machine Perfusion At a Large European Center -Real World Outcomes Following 238 Applications.","authors":"Felix J Krendl,Benno Cardini,Margot Fodor,Jessica Singh,Florian Ponholzer,Franka Messner,Annemarie Weissenbacher,Thomas Resch,Manuel Maglione,Christian Margreiter,Stephan Eschertzhuber,Christian Irsara,Andrea Griesmacher,Harald Schennach,Robert Breitkopf,Lisa Schlosser,Heinz Zoller,Herbert Tilg,Rupert Oberhuber,Stefan Schneeberger","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo report outcomes from routine clinical practice of liver transplantation (LT) following normothermic liver machine perfusion (NLMP) and compare to LT after static cold storage (SCS).\r\n\r\nBACKGROUND\r\nNLMP is emerging as a clinical routine in LT as has recently received renewed attention, however outcomes outside of clinical trials are lacking.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAll adult LT between February 2018 and January 2023 were included. Comprehensive viability assessment was applied during NLMP. Outcomes were compared between NLMP and SCS recipients, as well as benchmark and non-benchmark cases.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 332 LT included, 174 underwent NLMP and 158 were transplanted following SCS. Sixty-seven organs were accepted and transplanted only under the premise of NLMP. One-year graft survival for SCS and NLMP recipients was 83.8% vs. 81.3% and 93.4% for benchmark cases in the overall cohort. Total preservation time had no influence on graft survival in the NLMP group but was associated with inferior 1-year graft survival in the SCS group. NLMP usage increased significantly over the duration of the study period, as did the median total preservation time. With increasing NLMP use and longer preservation times, nighttime surgery decreased significantly from 41.9% to 4.2%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nProlonged preservation times ease logistics and enable daytime surgery. The possibility of NLMP offers to expand liver transplantation without negatively affecting outcomes.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To report outcomes from routine clinical practice of liver transplantation (LT) following normothermic liver machine perfusion (NLMP) and compare to LT after static cold storage (SCS).
BACKGROUND
NLMP is emerging as a clinical routine in LT as has recently received renewed attention, however outcomes outside of clinical trials are lacking.
METHODS
All adult LT between February 2018 and January 2023 were included. Comprehensive viability assessment was applied during NLMP. Outcomes were compared between NLMP and SCS recipients, as well as benchmark and non-benchmark cases.
RESULTS
Of the 332 LT included, 174 underwent NLMP and 158 were transplanted following SCS. Sixty-seven organs were accepted and transplanted only under the premise of NLMP. One-year graft survival for SCS and NLMP recipients was 83.8% vs. 81.3% and 93.4% for benchmark cases in the overall cohort. Total preservation time had no influence on graft survival in the NLMP group but was associated with inferior 1-year graft survival in the SCS group. NLMP usage increased significantly over the duration of the study period, as did the median total preservation time. With increasing NLMP use and longer preservation times, nighttime surgery decreased significantly from 41.9% to 4.2%.
CONCLUSIONS
Prolonged preservation times ease logistics and enable daytime surgery. The possibility of NLMP offers to expand liver transplantation without negatively affecting outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.