Prevalence of Fatigue and Associations With Depression and Cognitive Impairment in Patients With CADASIL.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amy A Jolly,Success Anyanwu,Fatemeh Koohi,Robin G Morris,Hugh S Markus
{"title":"Prevalence of Fatigue and Associations With Depression and Cognitive Impairment in Patients With CADASIL.","authors":"Amy A Jolly,Success Anyanwu,Fatemeh Koohi,Robin G Morris,Hugh S Markus","doi":"10.1212/wnl.0000000000213335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nFatigue is a common and disabling symptom in cerebrovascular disease and has been associated with white matter damage, but the underlying disease mechanisms are poorly understood. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common genetic form of stroke and causes a cerebral small vessel disease arteriopathy with white matter ischemia. We determined the prevalence of fatigue in CADASIL, the factors associated with it, and its relationship with both depression and cognitive impairment.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nProspectively recruited genetically confirmed patients with CADASIL were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale. The prevalence of fatigue in CADASIL was compared with that of healthy controls from the community. We determined associations between fatigue and clinical features, cardiovascular risk factors, MRI parameters, cognition, and depression. Cognition was measured using the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET) and depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Mediation and path analyses were performed to determine relationships between fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOne hundred seventy-four patients with CADASIL (mean age [SD] of 51.3 [12.30] years, 59.66% female) and 50 healthy controls were included in the analysis (mean age [SD] of 51.42 [12.58] years, 38.0% female). Fatigue was present in 51.7% of patients with CADASIL and was almost 5 times more common than in controls (OR: 4.99, 95% CI [2.28-10.95], p < 0.001). There was no association of fatigue with history of stroke or MRI parameters including white matter hyperintensity lesion volume. Logistic regression showed both GDS total score (OR: 1.11 [1.05-1.17], p = 0.0002) and BMET total score (OR: 0.86 [0.75-0.98], p = 0.02) to be predictors of fatigue. Fatigue, depression, and cognition were frequently comorbid. Mediation analysis showed depression to have a greater effect on fatigue prevalence than cognitive impairment. Path analysis confirmed depression to be the largest predictor of fatigue and found this relationship to be bidirectional.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nFatigue was present in over half of the patients with CADASIL. Depression and cognition were the main predictors of fatigue, and all 3 symptoms were frequently comorbid. The relationship between depression and fatigue was the strongest and was bidirectional. This suggests targeting depressive symptoms may have benefit in fatigue management.","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"37 1","pages":"e213335"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213335","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Fatigue is a common and disabling symptom in cerebrovascular disease and has been associated with white matter damage, but the underlying disease mechanisms are poorly understood. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common genetic form of stroke and causes a cerebral small vessel disease arteriopathy with white matter ischemia. We determined the prevalence of fatigue in CADASIL, the factors associated with it, and its relationship with both depression and cognitive impairment. METHODS Prospectively recruited genetically confirmed patients with CADASIL were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale. The prevalence of fatigue in CADASIL was compared with that of healthy controls from the community. We determined associations between fatigue and clinical features, cardiovascular risk factors, MRI parameters, cognition, and depression. Cognition was measured using the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET) and depression using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Mediation and path analyses were performed to determine relationships between fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment. RESULTS One hundred seventy-four patients with CADASIL (mean age [SD] of 51.3 [12.30] years, 59.66% female) and 50 healthy controls were included in the analysis (mean age [SD] of 51.42 [12.58] years, 38.0% female). Fatigue was present in 51.7% of patients with CADASIL and was almost 5 times more common than in controls (OR: 4.99, 95% CI [2.28-10.95], p < 0.001). There was no association of fatigue with history of stroke or MRI parameters including white matter hyperintensity lesion volume. Logistic regression showed both GDS total score (OR: 1.11 [1.05-1.17], p = 0.0002) and BMET total score (OR: 0.86 [0.75-0.98], p = 0.02) to be predictors of fatigue. Fatigue, depression, and cognition were frequently comorbid. Mediation analysis showed depression to have a greater effect on fatigue prevalence than cognitive impairment. Path analysis confirmed depression to be the largest predictor of fatigue and found this relationship to be bidirectional. DISCUSSION Fatigue was present in over half of the patients with CADASIL. Depression and cognition were the main predictors of fatigue, and all 3 symptoms were frequently comorbid. The relationship between depression and fatigue was the strongest and was bidirectional. This suggests targeting depressive symptoms may have benefit in fatigue management.
CADASIL患者的疲劳患病率及其与抑郁和认知障碍的关系
背景与目的疲劳是脑血管疾病中一种常见的致残症状,与脑白质损伤有关,但其潜在的发病机制尚不清楚。脑常染色体显性动脉病变伴皮质下梗死和白质脑病(CADASIL)是卒中最常见的遗传形式,可引起脑小血管病伴白质缺血的动脉病变。我们确定了CADASIL中疲劳的患病率,与之相关的因素,以及它与抑郁和认知障碍的关系。方法前瞻性招募基因确诊的CADASIL患者,采用疲劳严重程度量表进行评估。将CADASIL患者的疲劳患病率与社区健康对照进行比较。我们确定了疲劳与临床特征、心血管危险因素、MRI参数、认知和抑郁之间的关系。认知测试采用短时记忆和执行测试(BMET),抑郁测试采用老年抑郁量表(GDS)。通过中介和通径分析来确定疲劳、抑郁和认知障碍之间的关系。结果纳入174例CADASIL患者(平均年龄[SD] 51.3[12.30]岁,女性59.66%)和50例健康对照(平均年龄[SD] 51.42[12.58]岁,女性38.0%)。51.7%的CADASIL患者存在疲劳,几乎是对照组的5倍(OR: 4.99, 95% CI [2.28-10.95], p < 0.001)。疲劳与卒中史或MRI参数(包括白质高强度病变体积)无关联。Logistic回归显示GDS总分(OR: 1.11 [1.05-1.17], p = 0.0002)和BMET总分(OR: 0.86 [0.75-0.98], p = 0.02)均可作为疲劳的预测因子。疲劳、抑郁和认知常常是合并症。中介分析显示抑郁症对疲劳患病率的影响大于认知障碍。通径分析证实抑郁是疲劳的最大预测因子,并发现这种关系是双向的。超过一半的CADASIL患者存在疲劳。抑郁和认知是疲劳的主要预测因素,并且这3种症状经常并存。抑郁和疲劳之间的关系是最强的,并且是双向的。这表明针对抑郁症状可能对疲劳管理有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信