Coronal Malalignment Is Infrequently Present in Patients With Aseptic Tibial Loosening.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Jacob M Wilson, Zach C Cox, Martin Faschingbauer, Stephen M Engstrom, Gregory G Polkowski, J Bohannon Mason, J Ryan Martin
{"title":"Coronal Malalignment Is Infrequently Present in Patients With Aseptic Tibial Loosening.","authors":"Jacob M Wilson, Zach C Cox, Martin Faschingbauer, Stephen M Engstrom, Gregory G Polkowski, J Bohannon Mason, J Ryan Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronal lower extremity malalignment and improper implant position have been described as risk factors for aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, several prior studies have shown no association between alignment and implant loosening. Meanwhile, there is increasing interest in kinematic alignment. Therefore, we sought to determine the incidence of coronal malalignment of the limb and tibial component in patients that were revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 73 patients that were revised for aseptic tibial loosening was identified. Patient demographics were recorded. Radiographs from the primary procedure (preoperative and postoperative) were reviewed to determine the index coronal alignment of the knee and tibial component. Adequate alignment was noted if limb alignment was in neutral or appropriate valgus alignment and tibial implant position was within 3° of the neutral mechanical axis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four (5.5%) patients had varus alignment of the tibial component >3°. Therefore, 69/73 (94.5%) patients had well-aligned tibial implants. The average coronal alignment of the limb was 3° of valgus and six (8.2%) patients had coronal varus limb alignment (all >0° anatomic varus).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limb and tibial implant malalignment were infrequently seen in patients revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening. Most patients fell within previously described \"safe\" alignment parameters (<3° varus for the tibial component and neutral or valgus limb alignment). Specifically, malalignment was only present in approximately six to eight percent of patients. Therefore, factors other than alignment appear to contribute most to the development of aseptic tibial loosening. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 2","pages":"44-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronal lower extremity malalignment and improper implant position have been described as risk factors for aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, several prior studies have shown no association between alignment and implant loosening. Meanwhile, there is increasing interest in kinematic alignment. Therefore, we sought to determine the incidence of coronal malalignment of the limb and tibial component in patients that were revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening.

Methods: A cohort of 73 patients that were revised for aseptic tibial loosening was identified. Patient demographics were recorded. Radiographs from the primary procedure (preoperative and postoperative) were reviewed to determine the index coronal alignment of the knee and tibial component. Adequate alignment was noted if limb alignment was in neutral or appropriate valgus alignment and tibial implant position was within 3° of the neutral mechanical axis.

Results: Four (5.5%) patients had varus alignment of the tibial component >3°. Therefore, 69/73 (94.5%) patients had well-aligned tibial implants. The average coronal alignment of the limb was 3° of valgus and six (8.2%) patients had coronal varus limb alignment (all >0° anatomic varus).

Conclusion: Limb and tibial implant malalignment were infrequently seen in patients revised secondary to aseptic tibial loosening. Most patients fell within previously described "safe" alignment parameters (<3° varus for the tibial component and neutral or valgus limb alignment). Specifically, malalignment was only present in approximately six to eight percent of patients. Therefore, factors other than alignment appear to contribute most to the development of aseptic tibial loosening. Level of Evidence: III.

在无菌性胫骨松动患者中,冠状位不整并不常见。
背景:首次全膝关节置换术(TKA)后,冠状下肢不对齐和植入物位置不当被认为是无菌性胫骨松动的危险因素。然而,先前的一些研究表明,对准和种植体松动之间没有关联。同时,人们对运动学对齐的兴趣也越来越大。因此,我们试图确定继发于无菌性胫骨松动的患者中肢体和胫骨部分冠状排列不齐的发生率。方法:对73例接受无菌性胫骨松动治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。记录患者的人口统计数据。回顾首次手术(术前和术后)的x线片,以确定膝关节和胫骨组成部分的指数冠状排列。如果肢体对齐处于中立或适当的外翻对齐,并且胫骨植入物位置在中立机械轴的3°以内,则需要注意适当的对齐。结果:4例(5.5%)患者胫骨构件>.3°内翻对准。因此,69/73(94.5%)患者有对齐良好的胫骨植入物。肢体冠状位平均为外翻3°,6例(8.2%)患者呈冠状位内翻(均为解剖内翻100°)。结论:在无菌性胫骨松动后继发手术的患者中,肢体和胫骨假体不对准是少见的。大多数患者符合先前描述的“安全”对齐参数(证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信