Do Percutaneously Applied Medial Proximal Tibia Plates Need To Go Beneath the Pes Tendons?

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Andrew T Chen, Brad M Askam, John S Hwang, Madhav A Karunakar, Joseph R Hsu
{"title":"Do Percutaneously Applied Medial Proximal Tibia Plates Need To Go Beneath the Pes Tendons?","authors":"Andrew T Chen, Brad M Askam, John S Hwang, Madhav A Karunakar, Joseph R Hsu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are often associated with significant soft tissue compromise making operative treatment challenging. Dual plating through a two-incision approach following temporary external fixation has been shown to improve complication rates although deep infection rates remain high.The objective was to evaluate early outcomes following a novel technique of percutaneous application of the medial plate superficial to the pes anserinus tendons. Indications for a percutaneous medial plate included local soft tissue conditions, lack of or minimal involvement of medial articular surface with no displaced fragment requiring a posteromedial plate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review at a Level 1 Trauma Center identified twenty-four bicondylar tibial plateaus that were treated from 2015-2017 with standard lateral plate fixation and a medial plate that was percutaneously applied. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Demographic, injury characteristics, and co-morbidities were collected. The primary outcome was presence of a deep infection postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included secondary procedures, range of motion, and maintained radiographic alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-dominant fracture pattern was AO/OTA 41-C3 (75%). The percutaneous medial plate was applied first (71%). The average follow-up was 427 days. Ninety-five percent achieved at least 90 degrees of flexion. All had satisfactory coronal alignment (≤5 degrees) and condylar width (<5mm). Satisfactory articular reductions (≤2mm) were noted in 76% and satisfactory sagittal alignment (≤5 degrees) in 94%. One patient had persistent wound drainage and underwent hardware removal after union. Another patient is pending hardware removal with concerns for deep infection five years post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early results demonstrate that it is safe to place the medial proximal tibia plate above the pes anserinus tendons percutaneously for select fracture patterns with maintained alignment and reduction. This technique may help to minimize deep infection rates. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 2","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are often associated with significant soft tissue compromise making operative treatment challenging. Dual plating through a two-incision approach following temporary external fixation has been shown to improve complication rates although deep infection rates remain high.The objective was to evaluate early outcomes following a novel technique of percutaneous application of the medial plate superficial to the pes anserinus tendons. Indications for a percutaneous medial plate included local soft tissue conditions, lack of or minimal involvement of medial articular surface with no displaced fragment requiring a posteromedial plate.

Methods: A retrospective chart review at a Level 1 Trauma Center identified twenty-four bicondylar tibial plateaus that were treated from 2015-2017 with standard lateral plate fixation and a medial plate that was percutaneously applied. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Demographic, injury characteristics, and co-morbidities were collected. The primary outcome was presence of a deep infection postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included secondary procedures, range of motion, and maintained radiographic alignment.

Results: The pre-dominant fracture pattern was AO/OTA 41-C3 (75%). The percutaneous medial plate was applied first (71%). The average follow-up was 427 days. Ninety-five percent achieved at least 90 degrees of flexion. All had satisfactory coronal alignment (≤5 degrees) and condylar width (<5mm). Satisfactory articular reductions (≤2mm) were noted in 76% and satisfactory sagittal alignment (≤5 degrees) in 94%. One patient had persistent wound drainage and underwent hardware removal after union. Another patient is pending hardware removal with concerns for deep infection five years post-surgery.

Conclusion: Early results demonstrate that it is safe to place the medial proximal tibia plate above the pes anserinus tendons percutaneously for select fracture patterns with maintained alignment and reduction. This technique may help to minimize deep infection rates. Level of Evidence: IV.

经皮应用胫骨内侧近端钢板需要到足腱下方吗?
背景:胫骨双髁平台骨折通常伴有明显的软组织损伤,使得手术治疗具有挑战性。临时外固定后经双切口入路行双钢板可改善并发症发生率,但深度感染发生率仍然很高。目的是评估一种经皮在鹅足肌腱表面内侧钢板应用的新技术的早期结果。经皮内侧钢板的适应症包括局部软组织状况,内侧关节面不受援或极少受援,无移位碎片需要后内侧钢板。方法:回顾性分析某一级创伤中心2015-2017年24例采用标准外侧钢板固定和经皮内侧钢板治疗的双髁胫骨平台。根据AO/OTA分类对骨折进行分类。收集了人口统计学、损伤特征和合并症。主要结果是术后出现深部感染。次要结果包括二次手术、活动范围和维持的x线对准。结果:AO/OTA 41-C3型骨折占主导地位(75%)。首先应用经皮内侧钢板(71%)。平均随访时间为427天。95%的人达到了至少90度的屈曲。所有患者的冠状位对齐(≤5度)和髁突宽度均令人满意。结论:早期结果表明,经皮将胫骨内侧近端钢板置于鹅足肌腱上方,对于选择的骨折模式是安全的,并保持对齐和复位。这项技术可能有助于减少深部感染率。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信