Mortality and Function After Hip Fracture or Pneumonia in People With and Without Dementia.

Lauren J Hunt, R Sean Morrison, Siqi Gan, Edie Espejo, W John Boscardin, Rebecca Rodin, Katherine A Ornstein, Alexander K Smith
{"title":"Mortality and Function After Hip Fracture or Pneumonia in People With and Without Dementia.","authors":"Lauren J Hunt, R Sean Morrison, Siqi Gan, Edie Espejo, W John Boscardin, Rebecca Rodin, Katherine A Ornstein, Alexander K Smith","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent to which disruptive surgical or medical events impact mortality and function is critical for anticipatory planning and informing goal-aligned care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Health and Retirement Study data (2008-2018), we employed propensity score matching to compare the impact of hospitalization for hip fracture (a surgical event) or pneumonia (a medical event) among people with dementia to two groups: (1) people with dementia who did not experience these events; and (2) people without dementia who experienced an event. Dementia status was determined using validated cognitive assessments (Hurd method); hip fracture and pneumonia were identified from Medicare claims. Outcomes were 1-year mortality and function, defined as a summary score of requiring assistance with 6 ADL's and 5 IADL's, with higher scores indicating better function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among people with dementia, predicted 1-year mortality was higher among those with hip fracture (35.4%) versus those without hip fracture (14.8%), with similar patterns for pneumonia (49.6% vs. 13.0%). Among people with dementia, function declined abruptly at time of hip fracture (-2.09 [95% CI -2.94, -1.25]) and continued to decline after (-0.48 [95% CI -0.87, -0.09]). There were similar patterns for pneumonia (drop at time of pneumonia of -1.49 [95% CI -2.0, -0.97] and after -0.05 [95% CI, -0.29, 0.19]). Compared to people without dementia with hip fracture, people with dementia had higher 1-year mortality (35.4%) versus people without dementia (24%), with similar patterns for pneumonia (49.6% vs. 39.7%). Function stabilized for people without dementia after hip fracture (-0.03, 95% CI -0.22, 0.16), which was significantly different than people without dementia (p < 0.0001). Function improved for people without dementia after pneumonia (0.13, 95% CI 0.03, 0.24), but was not statistically different than for people with dementia (p = 0.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disruptive events such as hip fracture or pneumonia substantially alter the clinical trajectories of people with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The extent to which disruptive surgical or medical events impact mortality and function is critical for anticipatory planning and informing goal-aligned care.

Methods: Using Health and Retirement Study data (2008-2018), we employed propensity score matching to compare the impact of hospitalization for hip fracture (a surgical event) or pneumonia (a medical event) among people with dementia to two groups: (1) people with dementia who did not experience these events; and (2) people without dementia who experienced an event. Dementia status was determined using validated cognitive assessments (Hurd method); hip fracture and pneumonia were identified from Medicare claims. Outcomes were 1-year mortality and function, defined as a summary score of requiring assistance with 6 ADL's and 5 IADL's, with higher scores indicating better function.

Results: Among people with dementia, predicted 1-year mortality was higher among those with hip fracture (35.4%) versus those without hip fracture (14.8%), with similar patterns for pneumonia (49.6% vs. 13.0%). Among people with dementia, function declined abruptly at time of hip fracture (-2.09 [95% CI -2.94, -1.25]) and continued to decline after (-0.48 [95% CI -0.87, -0.09]). There were similar patterns for pneumonia (drop at time of pneumonia of -1.49 [95% CI -2.0, -0.97] and after -0.05 [95% CI, -0.29, 0.19]). Compared to people without dementia with hip fracture, people with dementia had higher 1-year mortality (35.4%) versus people without dementia (24%), with similar patterns for pneumonia (49.6% vs. 39.7%). Function stabilized for people without dementia after hip fracture (-0.03, 95% CI -0.22, 0.16), which was significantly different than people without dementia (p < 0.0001). Function improved for people without dementia after pneumonia (0.13, 95% CI 0.03, 0.24), but was not statistically different than for people with dementia (p = 0.17).

Conclusion: Disruptive events such as hip fracture or pneumonia substantially alter the clinical trajectories of people with dementia.

伴有和不伴有痴呆的患者髋部骨折或肺炎后的死亡率和功能。
背景:破坏性手术或医疗事件影响死亡率和功能的程度对于预期计划和告知目标一致的护理至关重要。方法:使用2008-2018年健康与退休研究数据,我们采用倾向评分匹配法比较痴呆患者髋部骨折(手术事件)或肺炎(医疗事件)住院对两组患者的影响:(1)未经历这些事件的痴呆患者;(2)没有痴呆症的人经历了一个事件。使用经过验证的认知评估(Hurd方法)确定痴呆状态;髋部骨折和肺炎都是从医疗保险索赔中确定的。结果是1年死亡率和功能,定义为需要辅助的6个ADL和5个IADL的总得分,得分越高表明功能越好。结果:在痴呆患者中,髋部骨折患者的预测1年死亡率(35.4%)高于无髋部骨折患者(14.8%),肺炎患者的预测1年死亡率相似(49.6%对13.0%)。在痴呆患者中,髋部骨折时功能突然下降(-2.09 [95% CI -2.94, -1.25]),骨折后功能继续下降(-0.48 [95% CI -0.87, -0.09])。肺炎也有类似的模式(肺炎时下降为-1.49 [95% CI, -2.0, -0.97],肺炎后下降为-0.05 [95% CI, -0.29, 0.19])。与无痴呆伴髋部骨折的患者相比,痴呆患者的1年死亡率(35.4%)高于无痴呆患者(24%),肺炎的模式相似(49.6%对39.7%)。髋部骨折后,无痴呆患者的功能稳定(-0.03,95% CI -0.22, 0.16),这与无痴呆患者有显著差异(p结论:髋部骨折或肺炎等破坏性事件显著改变了痴呆患者的临床轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信