Longitudinal Assessment of Sexual Behavior and Relationship Quality During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Britain: Findings from a Longitudinal Population Survey (Natsal-COVID).

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Naomi Miall, Alice Aveline, Andrew J Copas, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Andrew J Baxter, Julie Riddell, Laura Oakley, Dee Menezes, Anne Conolly, Chris Bonell, Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine H Mercer, Nigel Field, Kirstin R Mitchell, Malachi Willis
{"title":"Longitudinal Assessment of Sexual Behavior and Relationship Quality During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Britain: Findings from a Longitudinal Population Survey (Natsal-COVID).","authors":"Naomi Miall, Alice Aveline, Andrew J Copas, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Andrew J Baxter, Julie Riddell, Laura Oakley, Dee Menezes, Anne Conolly, Chris Bonell, Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine H Mercer, Nigel Field, Kirstin R Mitchell, Malachi Willis","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2432000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the impact of social restrictions on sexual and romantic life early in the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely studied, little is known about impacts beyond the initial months. We analyzed responses from 2,098 British adults (aged 18-59) taking part in the Natsal-COVID study (Waves 1 and 2). Participants were recruited via a web panel and surveyed twice: four months and one year after the start of the UK's first national lockdown (July 2020 and March 2021). Changes in the prevalence and frequency of participants' physical and virtual sexual behaviors between the two surveys were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Changes in the quality of intimate relationships were modeled using logistic regression for the 1,407 participants in steady relationships, adjusting for age, gender, and relationship status. The reported prevalence of any sexual activity amongst the full sample increased over the study period (from 88.1% to 91.5%, aOR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.84). Increases were observed for physical (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.15-1.74) and virtual (aOR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34) activities, particularly masturbation (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.37-1.72). Increases were larger for men than women. The proportion of participants in steady relationships whose relationship scored as \"lower quality\" increased (from 23.9% to 26.9%, aOR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.49). These findings have implications for understanding sexual health needs during disasters and planning sexual health service priorities following the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2432000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the impact of social restrictions on sexual and romantic life early in the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely studied, little is known about impacts beyond the initial months. We analyzed responses from 2,098 British adults (aged 18-59) taking part in the Natsal-COVID study (Waves 1 and 2). Participants were recruited via a web panel and surveyed twice: four months and one year after the start of the UK's first national lockdown (July 2020 and March 2021). Changes in the prevalence and frequency of participants' physical and virtual sexual behaviors between the two surveys were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Changes in the quality of intimate relationships were modeled using logistic regression for the 1,407 participants in steady relationships, adjusting for age, gender, and relationship status. The reported prevalence of any sexual activity amongst the full sample increased over the study period (from 88.1% to 91.5%, aOR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.84). Increases were observed for physical (aOR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.15-1.74) and virtual (aOR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34) activities, particularly masturbation (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.37-1.72). Increases were larger for men than women. The proportion of participants in steady relationships whose relationship scored as "lower quality" increased (from 23.9% to 26.9%, aOR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.49). These findings have implications for understanding sexual health needs during disasters and planning sexual health service priorities following the pandemic.

英国COVID-19大流行第一年性行为和关系质量的纵向评估:纵向人口调查(Natsal-COVID)的结果。
尽管人们广泛研究了 COVID-19 大流行初期社会限制对性生活和恋爱生活的影响,但对最初几个月之后的影响却知之甚少。我们分析了参加 Natsal-COVID 研究(第 1 波和第 2 波)的 2,098 名英国成年人(18-59 岁)的回答。参与者是通过网络面板招募的,并接受了两次调查:英国首次全国性封锁开始后的四个月和一年(2020 年 7 月和 2021 年 3 月)。我们使用多项式逻辑回归分析了两次调查之间参与者身体性行为和虚拟性行为的发生率和频率的变化。在对年龄、性别和关系状况进行调整后,采用逻辑回归法对有稳定关系的 1407 名参与者的亲密关系质量变化进行了建模。在研究期间,所有样本中报告的任何性活动的发生率都有所上升(从 88.1%上升到 91.5%,aOR = 1.50,95% CI 1.23-1.84)。观察到身体活动(aOR = 1.41,95% CI 1.15-1.74)和虚拟活动(aOR = 1.20,95% CI 1.07-1.34)的增加,尤其是手淫(aOR 1.53,95% CI 1.37-1.72)。男性的增幅大于女性。在保持稳定关系的参与者中,其关系被评为 "较低质量 "的比例有所上升(从 23.9% 上升到 26.9%,aOR = 1.28,95% CI 1.10-1.49)。这些研究结果对于了解灾难期间的性健康需求和规划大流行后性健康服务的优先事项具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信