Out-Of-Network Utilization and Plan Selection Among Medicare Advantage Cost Plan Enrollees.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Grace McCormack, Erin Trish
{"title":"Out-Of-Network Utilization and Plan Selection Among Medicare Advantage Cost Plan Enrollees.","authors":"Grace McCormack, Erin Trish","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how Medicare Advantage (MA) networks impact utilization patterns and plan choices, using the 2019 discontinuation of MA 1876 Cost plans as a natural experiment.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We study 1876 Cost plans, MA plans for which out-of-network care is covered through traditional Medicare (TM) and many of which CMS discontinued in 2019. We characterize the proportion of Cost plan enrollees who utilized out-of-network care in 2018 from different types of medical specialties. We then study how enrollees in discontinued plans selected into new plans in 2019. We use regression analysis to characterize whether higher risk enrollees selected into TM at higher rates.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We identify discontinued plans using public MA plan data. We employ administrative Medicare enrollment and TM claims data to identify 2018 enrollees of discontinued plans, their 2018 out-of-network utilization, and their subsequent 2019 enrollment decisions.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Among Cost plan enrollees, 69% utilized non-emergency room related care out of network in 2018. Out-of-network utilization was distributed across several types of specialties: 43% of Cost plan enrollees had at least one out-of-network claim with a primary care physician and over 20% had a claim with a medical specialist, surgical specialist, or nurse practitioner. We find evidence of adverse selection among enrollees of discontinued Cost plans in 2019. Conditional on one's 2018 Cost plan and county of residence, a standard deviation increase in risk score was on average associated with a 26.35% (95% CI, 25.57%-27.12%) increased likelihood of enrolling in TM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high rate of out-of-network utilization suggests that MA enrollees value access to care outside of standard MA networks. Subsequent selection patterns indicate that preferences for broader networks and subsequent enrollment in TM is highest among higher risk enrollees, suggesting limited networks may induce extensive margin selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand how Medicare Advantage (MA) networks impact utilization patterns and plan choices, using the 2019 discontinuation of MA 1876 Cost plans as a natural experiment.

Study setting and design: We study 1876 Cost plans, MA plans for which out-of-network care is covered through traditional Medicare (TM) and many of which CMS discontinued in 2019. We characterize the proportion of Cost plan enrollees who utilized out-of-network care in 2018 from different types of medical specialties. We then study how enrollees in discontinued plans selected into new plans in 2019. We use regression analysis to characterize whether higher risk enrollees selected into TM at higher rates.

Data sources and analytic sample: We identify discontinued plans using public MA plan data. We employ administrative Medicare enrollment and TM claims data to identify 2018 enrollees of discontinued plans, their 2018 out-of-network utilization, and their subsequent 2019 enrollment decisions.

Principal findings: Among Cost plan enrollees, 69% utilized non-emergency room related care out of network in 2018. Out-of-network utilization was distributed across several types of specialties: 43% of Cost plan enrollees had at least one out-of-network claim with a primary care physician and over 20% had a claim with a medical specialist, surgical specialist, or nurse practitioner. We find evidence of adverse selection among enrollees of discontinued Cost plans in 2019. Conditional on one's 2018 Cost plan and county of residence, a standard deviation increase in risk score was on average associated with a 26.35% (95% CI, 25.57%-27.12%) increased likelihood of enrolling in TM.

Conclusion: The high rate of out-of-network utilization suggests that MA enrollees value access to care outside of standard MA networks. Subsequent selection patterns indicate that preferences for broader networks and subsequent enrollment in TM is highest among higher risk enrollees, suggesting limited networks may induce extensive margin selection.

医疗保险优势成本计划参保人的网外利用与计划选择。
目的:利用2019年终止的MA 1876成本计划作为自然实验,了解医疗保险优势(MA)网络如何影响利用模式和计划选择。研究设置和设计:我们研究了1876个成本计划,网络外医疗通过传统医疗保险(TM)覆盖的MA计划,其中许多CMS于2019年停止。我们描述了2018年使用网络外护理的成本计划参保人的比例,这些参保人来自不同类型的医学专业。然后,我们研究停止计划的登登者如何在2019年选择新计划。我们使用回归分析来表征高风险的入组者是否以更高的比率选择TM。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用公共MA计划数据确定已终止的计划。我们使用行政医疗保险登记和TM索赔数据来确定2018年已终止计划的参保人,他们2018年的网外使用情况,以及他们随后的2019年参保决定。主要发现:在成本计划参保者中,69%的人在2018年使用了网络外的非急诊室相关护理。网络外的利用分布在几种类型的专业中:43%的成本计划参保人至少向初级保健医生提出过一次网络外索赔,超过20%的人向医学专家、外科专家或执业护士提出过索赔。我们发现在2019年终止的成本计划的参保人中存在逆向选择的证据。根据个人2018年的成本计划和居住地,风险评分的标准差增加平均与参加TM的可能性增加26.35% (95% CI, 25.57%-27.12%)相关。结论:高的网络外使用率表明,MA登登者重视获得标准MA网络外的医疗服务。随后的选择模式表明,高风险参保者对更广泛的网络和随后加入TM的偏好最高,这表明有限的网络可能导致广泛的边际选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信