Dexmedetomidine versus hyaluronidase along with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection in failed back surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Mina Maher Raouf, Sherry Shehata Kyriacos, Manal Hassanein, Gehan Ibrahim Abdel-Razek Salem, Amira Elsonbaty, Sadik Abdel-Maseeh Sadik, Mohammad Awad
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine versus hyaluronidase along with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection in failed back surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.","authors":"Mina Maher Raouf, Sherry Shehata Kyriacos, Manal Hassanein, Gehan Ibrahim Abdel-Razek Salem, Amira Elsonbaty, Sadik Abdel-Maseeh Sadik, Mohammad Awad","doi":"10.17085/apm.24094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Failed back surgery syndrome is a common problem faced by chronic pain management specialists. Steroid-only epidural injections have modest efficacy because of excessive scarring. Epidural hyaluronidase (HA), functions as a depolymerizing agent, successfully breaking down adhesions and collagen bundles, whereas dexmedetomidine (DEX) helps to reduce inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study is a randomized, double blind, clinical trial. The study cohort included population with persistent (> 6 months) back and/or radicular lower limb pain after laminectomy. Group I (HA group) received bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg), triamcinolone 40 mg, sterile saline (2 ml), and HA (1500 IU) instilled in 1 mL of distilled water. Group II (DEX group) received bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg), triamcinolone 40 mg (1 ml), DEX (0.5 mcg/kg), and sterile saline (2 ml).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores at all follow-ups compared to the pre-injection values. At 6 months, the DEX group experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain scores than the HA group (P = 0.003). In terms of the MODI, both groups showed significant reductions in disability scores at all follow-ups relative to the pre-injection values. The DEX group showed greater improvement in MODI values than the HA group. No significant complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both DEX and HA yielded significant improvements in pain and disability scores compared with pre-injection levels. The DEX group showed a more substantial and long-term reduction in both pain scores and disability index than the HA group.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":"61-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Failed back surgery syndrome is a common problem faced by chronic pain management specialists. Steroid-only epidural injections have modest efficacy because of excessive scarring. Epidural hyaluronidase (HA), functions as a depolymerizing agent, successfully breaking down adhesions and collagen bundles, whereas dexmedetomidine (DEX) helps to reduce inflammation.
Methods: The current study is a randomized, double blind, clinical trial. The study cohort included population with persistent (> 6 months) back and/or radicular lower limb pain after laminectomy. Group I (HA group) received bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg), triamcinolone 40 mg, sterile saline (2 ml), and HA (1500 IU) instilled in 1 mL of distilled water. Group II (DEX group) received bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg), triamcinolone 40 mg (1 ml), DEX (0.5 mcg/kg), and sterile saline (2 ml).
Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores at all follow-ups compared to the pre-injection values. At 6 months, the DEX group experienced a significantly greater reduction in pain scores than the HA group (P = 0.003). In terms of the MODI, both groups showed significant reductions in disability scores at all follow-ups relative to the pre-injection values. The DEX group showed greater improvement in MODI values than the HA group. No significant complications were reported.
Conclusions: Both DEX and HA yielded significant improvements in pain and disability scores compared with pre-injection levels. The DEX group showed a more substantial and long-term reduction in both pain scores and disability index than the HA group.