Prevalence of complications of buccal fat removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Maryana Calisto Albuquerque, Karen Ariely Rocha Arruda, Gesner Francisco Xavier Junior, Andrea Cristina da Silva Gama Cerqueira, Carla Massignan, Flaviana Soares Rocha
{"title":"Prevalence of complications of buccal fat removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maryana Calisto Albuquerque, Karen Ariely Rocha Arruda, Gesner Francisco Xavier Junior, Andrea Cristina da Silva Gama Cerqueira, Carla Massignan, Flaviana Soares Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Removal of the buccal fat pad can be considered safe as long as there is a detailed analysis of anatomical landmarks. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of intra- and postoperative complications resulting from buccal fat pad removal through a systematic review. The search strategy involved observational and/or interventional studies in humans that included at least one case of buccal fat pad removal with a description of the surgery, postoperative progress, and complications. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the JBI checklist. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. In total, 12 studies were included. Out of 308 patients who underwent buccal fat pad removal, 81 experienced some form of complication, with an overall prevalence of 25% (95% CI = 0.04-0.46). Complications found in the data collection included edema (38.40%), trismus (30.09%), pain (19.41%), asymmetry (11.65%), facial nerve paralysis (0.97%), infection (0.48%), hematoma (0.48%), and unilateral emphysema (0.48%). All complications occurred in the postoperative period. There was high heterogeneity among the studies. One in four patients undergoing buccal fat pad removal experiences some form of postoperative complication. Consequently, the procedure should be recommended with caution because there is evidence for safety concerns and a lack of predictability in the evaluated studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Removal of the buccal fat pad can be considered safe as long as there is a detailed analysis of anatomical landmarks. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of intra- and postoperative complications resulting from buccal fat pad removal through a systematic review. The search strategy involved observational and/or interventional studies in humans that included at least one case of buccal fat pad removal with a description of the surgery, postoperative progress, and complications. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the JBI checklist. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. In total, 12 studies were included. Out of 308 patients who underwent buccal fat pad removal, 81 experienced some form of complication, with an overall prevalence of 25% (95% CI = 0.04-0.46). Complications found in the data collection included edema (38.40%), trismus (30.09%), pain (19.41%), asymmetry (11.65%), facial nerve paralysis (0.97%), infection (0.48%), hematoma (0.48%), and unilateral emphysema (0.48%). All complications occurred in the postoperative period. There was high heterogeneity among the studies. One in four patients undergoing buccal fat pad removal experiences some form of postoperative complication. Consequently, the procedure should be recommended with caution because there is evidence for safety concerns and a lack of predictability in the evaluated studies.

口腔脂肪去除并发症的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
只要有详细的解剖标志分析,就可以认为是安全的。本研究的目的是通过系统回顾来估计口腔脂肪垫去除术中和术后并发症的发生率。搜索策略包括观察性和/或干预性的人类研究,包括至少一例口腔脂肪垫去除,并描述手术、术后进展和并发症。使用JBI检查表进行方法学质量评估。采用I2检验评估研究异质性。总共纳入了12项研究。308例接受口腔脂肪垫去除的患者中,81例出现了某种形式的并发症,总体患病率为25% (95% CI = 0.04-0.46)。并发症包括水肿(38.40%)、牙关(30.09%)、疼痛(19.41%)、不对称(11.65%)、面神经麻痹(0.97%)、感染(0.48%)、血肿(0.48%)、单侧肺气肿(0.48%)。所有并发症均发生在术后。研究之间存在高度异质性。四分之一的患者接受口腔脂肪垫去除经历某种形式的术后并发症。因此,应谨慎推荐该程序,因为有证据表明存在安全问题,并且在评估的研究中缺乏可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信