Tunisian Recommendations for Best Practices in the Management of Spondyloarthritis: Methodology.

Q3 Medicine
Khadija Baccouche, Ines Mahmoud, Mohamed Manaa, Imen Gharsallah, Nedia Testouri, Kaouther Maatallah, Mohamed Younès, Saoussen Zrour, Wafa Hamdi, Saoussen Miladi, Ahmed Laatar, Alia Fazaa, Aicha BenTekaya, Raoudha Tekaya, Mohamed Montacer Kchir
{"title":"Tunisian Recommendations for Best Practices in the Management of Spondyloarthritis: Methodology.","authors":"Khadija Baccouche, Ines Mahmoud, Mohamed Manaa, Imen Gharsallah, Nedia Testouri, Kaouther Maatallah, Mohamed Younès, Saoussen Zrour, Wafa Hamdi, Saoussen Miladi, Ahmed Laatar, Alia Fazaa, Aicha BenTekaya, Raoudha Tekaya, Mohamed Montacer Kchir","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This framework was developed under the auspices of the Tunisian League Against Rheumatism (LITAR), coordinated by a project leader. The primary objective is to formulate recommendations for the management of spondyloarthritis, grounded in the development of questions structured according to the PICO model. This model defines four essential elements of a clinical question: P: Patient or Population or Problem, I: Intervention (the proposed action), C: Comparison (between diagnostic tests, treatments, etc.), and O: Outcome (clinical results, measured events, judgment criteria, etc.). A working group was established, coordinated by a project leader appointed by LITAR. This group included rheumatologists recognized as experts in the disease by the scientific community, as well as a methodological and epidemiological rheumatologist. The bibliographic search focused on international literature (meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, etc.) and other sources of information (HAS, clinical practice guidelines), as well as national literature (theses, dissertations, publications, conference presentations). In-person and virtual meetings of the working group enabled the formulation of the recommendations, following the presentation of literature data and extensive discussions among the experts. The draft of the recommendations was submitted to the same experts for validation and assessment of the level of agreement, which determined the strength of the recommendations. Subsequently, the recommendations were reviewed by a reading group appointed by the working group. The final version was adjusted based on feedback from both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":"103 1","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v103i1.5565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This framework was developed under the auspices of the Tunisian League Against Rheumatism (LITAR), coordinated by a project leader. The primary objective is to formulate recommendations for the management of spondyloarthritis, grounded in the development of questions structured according to the PICO model. This model defines four essential elements of a clinical question: P: Patient or Population or Problem, I: Intervention (the proposed action), C: Comparison (between diagnostic tests, treatments, etc.), and O: Outcome (clinical results, measured events, judgment criteria, etc.). A working group was established, coordinated by a project leader appointed by LITAR. This group included rheumatologists recognized as experts in the disease by the scientific community, as well as a methodological and epidemiological rheumatologist. The bibliographic search focused on international literature (meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, etc.) and other sources of information (HAS, clinical practice guidelines), as well as national literature (theses, dissertations, publications, conference presentations). In-person and virtual meetings of the working group enabled the formulation of the recommendations, following the presentation of literature data and extensive discussions among the experts. The draft of the recommendations was submitted to the same experts for validation and assessment of the level of agreement, which determined the strength of the recommendations. Subsequently, the recommendations were reviewed by a reading group appointed by the working group. The final version was adjusted based on feedback from both groups.

突尼斯关于脊椎关节炎管理最佳实践的建议:方法学。
该框架是在突尼斯抗风湿病联盟的主持下制定的,由一名项目负责人协调。主要目标是根据PICO模型提出的问题,为脊柱炎的治疗提出建议。该模型定义了临床问题的四个基本要素:P:患者或人群或问题,I:干预(建议的行动),C:比较(诊断测试、治疗等之间的比较),O:结果(临床结果、测量事件、判断标准等)。成立了一个工作组,由LITAR任命的一名项目负责人协调。这个小组包括被科学界公认为该疾病专家的风湿病学家,以及风湿病方法学和流行病学专家。文献检索的重点是国际文献(荟萃分析、随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究等)和其他信息源(HAS、临床实践指南),以及国内文献(论文、学位论文、出版物、会议报告)。在提交了文献数据和专家之间的广泛讨论之后,工作组的面对面会议和虚拟会议使建议得以制定。建议草案已提交给这些专家,以核实和评估同意的程度,从而确定建议的力度。随后,工作组任命的一个阅读小组审查了这些建议。最终版本根据两组的反馈进行了调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信