Lack of thermal acclimation in multiple indices of climate vulnerability in bumblebees.

IF 3.8 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
C L Poore, E J Ibarra-Garibay, A L Toth, E A Riddell
{"title":"Lack of thermal acclimation in multiple indices of climate vulnerability in bumblebees.","authors":"C L Poore, E J Ibarra-Garibay, A L Toth, E A Riddell","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.2216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indices of climate vulnerability are used to predict species' vulnerability to climate change based on intrinsic physiological traits, such as thermal tolerance, thermal sensitivity and thermal acclimation, but rarely is the consistency among indices evaluated simultaneously. We compared the thermal physiology of queen bumblebees between a species experiencing local declines (<i>Bombus auricomus</i>) and a species exhibiting continent-wide increases (<i>B. impatiens</i>). We conducted a multi-week acclimation experiment under simulated climate warming to measure critical thermal maximum (CT<sub>max</sub>), critical thermal minimum (CT<sub>min</sub>), the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate and water loss rate and acclimation in each of these traits. We also measured survival throughout the experiment and after the thermal tolerance trials. Neither species acclimated to the temperature treatments by adjusting any physiological trait. We found conflicting patterns among indices of vulnerability within and between species. We also found that individuals with the highest CT<sub>max</sub> exhibited the lowest survival following the thermal tolerance trial. Our study highlights inconsistent patterns across multiple indices of climate vulnerability within and between species, indicating that physiological studies measuring only one index of climate vulnerability may be limited in their ability to inform species' responses to environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2038","pages":"20242216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.2216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indices of climate vulnerability are used to predict species' vulnerability to climate change based on intrinsic physiological traits, such as thermal tolerance, thermal sensitivity and thermal acclimation, but rarely is the consistency among indices evaluated simultaneously. We compared the thermal physiology of queen bumblebees between a species experiencing local declines (Bombus auricomus) and a species exhibiting continent-wide increases (B. impatiens). We conducted a multi-week acclimation experiment under simulated climate warming to measure critical thermal maximum (CTmax), critical thermal minimum (CTmin), the thermal sensitivity of metabolic rate and water loss rate and acclimation in each of these traits. We also measured survival throughout the experiment and after the thermal tolerance trials. Neither species acclimated to the temperature treatments by adjusting any physiological trait. We found conflicting patterns among indices of vulnerability within and between species. We also found that individuals with the highest CTmax exhibited the lowest survival following the thermal tolerance trial. Our study highlights inconsistent patterns across multiple indices of climate vulnerability within and between species, indicating that physiological studies measuring only one index of climate vulnerability may be limited in their ability to inform species' responses to environmental change.

大黄蜂气候脆弱性多指标缺乏热适应。
气候脆弱性指数被用来预测物种对气候变化的脆弱性,这些指数基于内在的生理特征,如热耐受性、热敏感性和热适应性,但很少同时评估不同指数之间的一致性。我们比较了正在经历局部衰退的熊蜂皇后(Bombus auricomus)和正在经历全洲范围内衰退的熊蜂皇后(B. impatiens)的热生理特征。我们在模拟气候变暖的条件下进行了为期多周的适应实验,以测量临界最大热量(CTmax)、临界最小热量(CTmin)、代谢率和失水率的热敏感性以及这些特征的适应性。我们还测量了整个实验过程和耐热试验后的存活率。两个物种都没有通过调整任何生理特征来适应温度处理。我们发现,物种内部和物种之间的脆弱性指数之间存在相互矛盾的模式。我们还发现,耐热试验后,CTmax最高的个体存活率最低。我们的研究强调了物种内部和物种之间气候脆弱性的多种指数之间不一致的模式,这表明仅测量一种气候脆弱性指数的生理学研究在告知物种对环境变化的反应方面的能力可能是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
502
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信