Assessment of Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Is It Clinically Relevant or Simply an Amusement for Experts?

Q2 Medicine
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000542470
Ekaterina Safroneeva, Alain M Schoepfer
{"title":"Assessment of Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Is It Clinically Relevant or Simply an Amusement for Experts?","authors":"Ekaterina Safroneeva, Alain M Schoepfer","doi":"10.1159/000542470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the first description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as clinicopathologic syndrome three decades ago, considerable progress has been made to standardize and validate instruments to assess symptom severity, quality of life, endoscopic, and histologic activity for the purpose of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Standardized assessment of EoE activity is crucial to be able to compare the results of therapeutic interventions and bring much needed therapies to patients. This review focuses on outcome assessment of disease activity in adults with EoE.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The choice of endpoints/instruments to be used depends on the setting, which might be either an RCT, an observational study, or clinical practice. In RCTs, the choice of endpoints further depends on requirements from regional regulatory authorities. Primary endpoints chosen in RCTs typically focused on symptoms and esophageal peak eosinophil counts, although that likely will change, as therapies with new mechanism of action are explored. Validated symptom-based PRO instruments used in RCTs include the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), the EoE activity index (EEsAI) PRO instrument, and numeric rating scales for dysphagia and pain. Histologic activity in RCT is assessed using the EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) that takes into account the severity and extent of eight distinct histologic features. Endoscopic activity is assessed using the EREFS (Exudates, Rings, Edema, Furrows, Stricture) grading system. For observational studies, activity assessment is based on EEsAI PRO, epithelial peak eosinophil counts, and EREFS. In daily clinical practice, EoE activity is based on assessment of symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS, from 0-10), peak eosinophil count, and EREFS. Several other instruments including the I-SEE, dysphagia-free days over a defined period, the dysphagia stress test, and impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP), to assess EoE severity in clinical practice are currently under evaluation.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>EoE activity assessment based on symptom-based PRO, histology, and endoscopy has become increasingly complex and varies depending on the setting. While more stringent endpoints and daily recall PRO instruments are being used in RCTs, new instruments aimed at broader disease activity assessment and weekly recall PRO instruments are being used in observational studies and daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13605,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","volume":"10 1","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the first description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as clinicopathologic syndrome three decades ago, considerable progress has been made to standardize and validate instruments to assess symptom severity, quality of life, endoscopic, and histologic activity for the purpose of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Standardized assessment of EoE activity is crucial to be able to compare the results of therapeutic interventions and bring much needed therapies to patients. This review focuses on outcome assessment of disease activity in adults with EoE.

Summary: The choice of endpoints/instruments to be used depends on the setting, which might be either an RCT, an observational study, or clinical practice. In RCTs, the choice of endpoints further depends on requirements from regional regulatory authorities. Primary endpoints chosen in RCTs typically focused on symptoms and esophageal peak eosinophil counts, although that likely will change, as therapies with new mechanism of action are explored. Validated symptom-based PRO instruments used in RCTs include the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), the EoE activity index (EEsAI) PRO instrument, and numeric rating scales for dysphagia and pain. Histologic activity in RCT is assessed using the EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) that takes into account the severity and extent of eight distinct histologic features. Endoscopic activity is assessed using the EREFS (Exudates, Rings, Edema, Furrows, Stricture) grading system. For observational studies, activity assessment is based on EEsAI PRO, epithelial peak eosinophil counts, and EREFS. In daily clinical practice, EoE activity is based on assessment of symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS, from 0-10), peak eosinophil count, and EREFS. Several other instruments including the I-SEE, dysphagia-free days over a defined period, the dysphagia stress test, and impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP), to assess EoE severity in clinical practice are currently under evaluation.

Key messages: EoE activity assessment based on symptom-based PRO, histology, and endoscopy has become increasingly complex and varies depending on the setting. While more stringent endpoints and daily recall PRO instruments are being used in RCTs, new instruments aimed at broader disease activity assessment and weekly recall PRO instruments are being used in observational studies and daily clinical practice.

嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎的疾病活动性评估:是临床相关还是仅仅是专家的娱乐?
背景:自从30年前嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)首次被描述为临床病理综合征以来,为了随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究的目的,在标准化和验证评估症状严重程度、生活质量、内镜和组织学活动的工具方面取得了相当大的进展。EoE活动的标准化评估对于能够比较治疗干预的结果并为患者提供急需的治疗至关重要。这篇综述的重点是对成年EoE患者疾病活动性的结果评估。总结:终点/工具的选择取决于环境,可以是随机对照试验、观察性研究或临床实践。在随机对照试验中,终点的选择进一步取决于地区监管当局的要求。随机对照试验选择的主要终点通常集中在症状和食管嗜酸性粒细胞峰值计数上,尽管随着新的作用机制的探索,这可能会改变。rct中使用的基于症状的PRO工具包括每日症状问卷(DSQ)、EoE活动指数(EEsAI) PRO工具以及吞咽困难和疼痛的数值评定量表。RCT中的组织学活动使用EoE组织学评分系统(EoEHSS)进行评估,该系统考虑了八种不同组织学特征的严重程度和程度。使用EREFS(渗出物、环、水肿、沟纹、狭窄)分级系统评估内镜活动。对于观察性研究,活性评估是基于EEsAI PRO、上皮细胞峰值嗜酸性粒细胞计数和EREFS。在日常临床实践中,EoE活动是基于使用视觉模拟量表(VAS, 0-10分)、嗜酸性粒细胞峰值计数和EREFS对症状的评估。目前正在评估临床实践中用于评估EoE严重程度的其他几种工具,包括I-SEE、规定时间内无吞咽困难天数、吞咽困难压力测试和阻抗平面测量法(EndoFLIP)。关键信息:基于症状的PRO、组织学和内窥镜的EoE活动评估变得越来越复杂,并因环境而异。虽然rct中使用了更严格的终点和每日召回率PRO仪器,但观察性研究和日常临床实践中正在使用旨在更广泛的疾病活动性评估和每周召回率PRO仪器的新仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信