Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marcelo A Crockett, Daniel Núñez, Pablo Martínez, Francesca Borghero, Susana Campos, Álvaro I Langer, Jimena Carrasco, Vania Martínez
{"title":"Interventions to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Young People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Marcelo A Crockett, Daniel Núñez, Pablo Martínez, Francesca Borghero, Susana Campos, Álvaro I Langer, Jimena Carrasco, Vania Martínez","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mental health stigma is a considerable barrier to help-seeking among young people.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma in young people.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Comprehensive searches were conducted in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases from inception to February 27, 2024. Search terms included \"stigma,\" \"mental health,\" \"mental disorders,\" \"adolescents,\" \"youth,\" and \"randomized controlled trial.\"</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs involving interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma among young people (aged 10-24 years). Studies had to report outcomes related to stigma or help-seeking behaviors. Exclusion criteria included grey literature and studies without results.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted independently by 7 authors (M.A.C., D.N., F.B., S.C., Á.I.L., J.C., V.M.) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three-level multivariate meta-analyses were conducted to account for within-study correlations and to maximize data use. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Hedges g) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. The data analysis was conducted from May 30 through July 4, 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcomes included stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and general stigma. Help-seeking outcomes were categorized into attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 43 852 young people (mean [IQR] age, 18.7 [15.8-21.3] years; mean [IQR] females, 59.2% [49.4%-72.0%]), and 74 studies were included in 3-level multivariate meta-analyses. Significant short-term effect sizes were found for stigma-related knowledge (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89), attitudes (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56), behaviors (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.45), and general stigma (SMD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34) and for help-seeking attitudes (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28) and intentions (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21). Social contact interventions had a greater influence on stigma-related behaviors than did educational approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings suggest that interventions to reduce mental health stigma among youth are beneficial in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand and enhance these interventions' outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2454730"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Mental health stigma is a considerable barrier to help-seeking among young people.

Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma in young people.

Data sources: Comprehensive searches were conducted in the CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases from inception to February 27, 2024. Search terms included "stigma," "mental health," "mental disorders," "adolescents," "youth," and "randomized controlled trial."

Study selection: Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs involving interventions aimed at reducing mental health stigma among young people (aged 10-24 years). Studies had to report outcomes related to stigma or help-seeking behaviors. Exclusion criteria included grey literature and studies without results.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted independently by 7 authors (M.A.C., D.N., F.B., S.C., Á.I.L., J.C., V.M.) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Three-level multivariate meta-analyses were conducted to account for within-study correlations and to maximize data use. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Hedges g) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated. The data analysis was conducted from May 30 through July 4, 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes included stigma-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and general stigma. Help-seeking outcomes were categorized into attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and empowerment.

Results: A total of 97 studies were included in the systematic review, representing 43 852 young people (mean [IQR] age, 18.7 [15.8-21.3] years; mean [IQR] females, 59.2% [49.4%-72.0%]), and 74 studies were included in 3-level multivariate meta-analyses. Significant short-term effect sizes were found for stigma-related knowledge (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89), attitudes (SMD, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56), behaviors (SMD, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.45), and general stigma (SMD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34) and for help-seeking attitudes (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.09-0.28) and intentions (SMD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.21). Social contact interventions had a greater influence on stigma-related behaviors than did educational approaches.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that interventions to reduce mental health stigma among youth are beneficial in the short term. Further high-quality RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to better understand and enhance these interventions' outcomes.

减少青少年心理健康污名的干预措施:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
重要性:心理健康污名是年轻人寻求帮助的一大障碍。目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在减少年轻人心理健康污名化的随机临床试验(rct)。数据来源:在CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed和PsycINFO数据库中进行了全面的检索,从成立到2024年2月27日。搜索词包括“耻辱”、“精神健康”、“精神障碍”、“青少年”、“青年”和“随机对照试验”。研究选择:纳入标准包括涉及旨在减少年轻人(10-24岁)心理健康污名的干预措施的随机对照试验。研究必须报告与耻辱或寻求帮助行为相关的结果。排除标准包括灰色文献和无结果的研究。数据提取与合成:数据由7位作者(M.A.C, d.n., f.b., s.c., Á.I.L)独立提取。, j.c., V.M.)在系统评价和元分析指南中使用首选报告项。使用Cochrane风险-偏倚工具评估偏倚风险。进行了三水平多变量荟萃分析,以解释研究内的相关性并最大限度地利用数据。计算95% ci的标准化平均差异(SMDs) (Hedges g)和优势比(ORs)。数据分析时间为2024年5月30日至7月4日。主要结局和测量:主要结局包括耻感相关知识、态度、行为和总体耻感。寻求帮助的结果分为态度、意图和行为。次要结果包括自我效能和授权。结果:系统评价共纳入97项研究,代表43 852名年轻人(平均[IQR]年龄,18.7[15.8-21.3]岁;平均[IQR]女性,59.2%[49.4%-72.0%]),74项研究被纳入3水平多因素荟萃分析。耻感相关知识的短期效应显著(SMD, 0.66;95% CI, 0.43-0.89),态度(SMD, 0.38;95% CI, 0.20-0.56),行为(SMD, 0.29;95% CI, 0.13-0.45)和一般柱头(SMD, 0.20;95% CI, 0.06-0.34)和寻求帮助的态度(SMD, 0.18;95% CI, 0.09-0.28)和意向(SMD, 0.14;95% ci, 0.07-0.21)。社会接触干预对耻感相关行为的影响比教育方法更大。结论和相关性:这些发现表明,减少青少年心理健康污名的干预措施在短期内是有益的。需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验和长期随访,以更好地了解和加强这些干预措施的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信