{"title":"Assessing Cigarette Reduction Tax-Effectiveness in Low Tobacco Expenditure Contexts: An Application to Bolivia.","authors":"Joaquín Morales, Sara Santander","doi":"10.1002/hec.4931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this research we show that ambitious increases in tobacco tax rates can substantially reduce tobacco consumption, increase fiscal revenue, and provide net positive social benefits even in contexts of low consumption prevalence and intensity. Low nicotine intake still constitutes a grave disease risk factor, and the effectiveness of tax increases might be questioned if income effects are small. We adapt spatial variation of price methodologies to deal with low prevalence and intensity, censored data, and small samples using the Bolivian case as an illustration. We find an average price elasticity of demand of <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>0.69</mn></mrow> <annotation>${-}0.69$</annotation></semantics> </math> to <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>0.76</mn></mrow> <annotation>${-}0.76$</annotation></semantics> </math> . Using our estimates of elasticities, we develop a simulation to anticipate the effects of a 35% yearly increase of the Bolivian specific excise on tobacco starting in 2025. Our estimates show that by 2030, this reform could reduce the consumption of cigarettes by 52.6%, diminish the prevalence of smoking by 30.6%, and increase fiscal revenue by $123 million over six years. Moreover, we estimate that the abated direct medical costs of reduced consumption net of the deadweight loss associated with a tax increase would generate a net social gain of over $100 million in five years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this research we show that ambitious increases in tobacco tax rates can substantially reduce tobacco consumption, increase fiscal revenue, and provide net positive social benefits even in contexts of low consumption prevalence and intensity. Low nicotine intake still constitutes a grave disease risk factor, and the effectiveness of tax increases might be questioned if income effects are small. We adapt spatial variation of price methodologies to deal with low prevalence and intensity, censored data, and small samples using the Bolivian case as an illustration. We find an average price elasticity of demand of to . Using our estimates of elasticities, we develop a simulation to anticipate the effects of a 35% yearly increase of the Bolivian specific excise on tobacco starting in 2025. Our estimates show that by 2030, this reform could reduce the consumption of cigarettes by 52.6%, diminish the prevalence of smoking by 30.6%, and increase fiscal revenue by $123 million over six years. Moreover, we estimate that the abated direct medical costs of reduced consumption net of the deadweight loss associated with a tax increase would generate a net social gain of over $100 million in five years.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.