Opioid Prescriptions for Low Back Pain among Military-Connected Older Adults Across Multiple Care Systems.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z
Janiece L Taylor, Patricia K Carreño, Shannon Alsobrooks, Alexander G Velosky, Germaine F Herrera, Maxwell Amoako, Megan O'Connell, Ryan C Costantino, Krista B Highland
{"title":"Opioid Prescriptions for Low Back Pain among Military-Connected Older Adults Across Multiple Care Systems.","authors":"Janiece L Taylor, Patricia K Carreño, Shannon Alsobrooks, Alexander G Velosky, Germaine F Herrera, Maxwell Amoako, Megan O'Connell, Ryan C Costantino, Krista B Highland","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Untreated low back pain (LBP) in older adults can lead to disability and development of chronicity. Due to the potential development of medical comorbidities and negative risks associated with pharmacological use, chronic LBP management for older adults requires a responsive approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the probability of (1) opioid prescription receipt and (2) opioid-sedative coprescription, in a sample of military-service-connected patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or TRICARE, ages 30-85 years, receiving care in three systems: VHA, Military Health System (MHS), and nonfederal (civilian) healthcare facilities. Generalized linear models evaluated inequities across intersections of age, race and ethnicity, and care system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age was negatively associated with opioid-sedative coprescription receipt (p < 0.001) but was not significantly associated with opioid prescription receipt (p = 0.09). Across both models, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Latine patients were less likely than white patients to receive either outcome (p < 0.001-0.002). Opioid-sedative coprescription probability decreased across age for Asian and Pacific Islander (p = 0.003) and Latine (p = 0.01) patients in the MHS but increased in white patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is imperative that clinicians and healthcare systems provide effective and sustainable treatment for LBP in older adults, including programming, that enhances shared decision-making and whole-health approach championed by the VHA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"143-153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01176-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Untreated low back pain (LBP) in older adults can lead to disability and development of chronicity. Due to the potential development of medical comorbidities and negative risks associated with pharmacological use, chronic LBP management for older adults requires a responsive approach.

Methods: The objective of this study is to evaluate the probability of (1) opioid prescription receipt and (2) opioid-sedative coprescription, in a sample of military-service-connected patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or TRICARE, ages 30-85 years, receiving care in three systems: VHA, Military Health System (MHS), and nonfederal (civilian) healthcare facilities. Generalized linear models evaluated inequities across intersections of age, race and ethnicity, and care system.

Results: Age was negatively associated with opioid-sedative coprescription receipt (p < 0.001) but was not significantly associated with opioid prescription receipt (p = 0.09). Across both models, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Latine patients were less likely than white patients to receive either outcome (p < 0.001-0.002). Opioid-sedative coprescription probability decreased across age for Asian and Pacific Islander (p = 0.003) and Latine (p = 0.01) patients in the MHS but increased in white patients.

Conclusions: It is imperative that clinicians and healthcare systems provide effective and sustainable treatment for LBP in older adults, including programming, that enhances shared decision-making and whole-health approach championed by the VHA.

阿片类药物处方在多个护理系统中与军队有关的老年人腰痛
背景:未经治疗的老年人腰痛(LBP)可导致残疾和慢性发展。由于与药物使用相关的潜在医学合并症和负面风险的发展,老年人的慢性腰痛管理需要一种响应性的方法。方法:本研究的目的是评估在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)或TRICARE登记的30-85岁的军人相关患者样本中(1)阿片类药物处方收据和(2)阿片类镇静剂共处方的概率,这些患者在三个系统中接受护理:VHA,军事卫生系统(MHS)和非联邦(民用)医疗机构。广义线性模型评估了年龄、种族和民族以及护理系统的不平等。结果:年龄与阿片类镇静剂处方接受度呈负相关(p < 0.001),与阿片类镇静剂处方接受度无显著相关(p = 0.09)。在两种模型中,亚洲和太平洋岛民、黑人和拉丁裔患者比白人患者更不可能获得任何结果(p < 0.001-0.002)。在MHS中,亚洲和太平洋岛民(p = 0.003)和拉丁裔(p = 0.01)患者的阿片类镇静剂共处方概率随年龄而降低,而白人患者则增加。结论:临床医生和医疗保健系统必须为老年人LBP提供有效和可持续的治疗,包括规划,以加强VHA倡导的共同决策和整体健康方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信