{"title":"Regarding: Delirium and frailty in older adults: Clinical overlap and biological underpinnings","authors":"José Lucas Sena da Silva, Juliana Caldas","doi":"10.1111/joim.20048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>The review by Bellelli et al. recently published in the <i>Journal of Internal Medicine</i> examines the relationship between frailty and delirium—two geriatric syndromes that significantly impact morbidity, mortality, functionality, cognition, quality of life, healthcare costs, and caregiver burden [<span>1</span>]. The authors assess the current evidence regarding how these conditions share risk factors, prevalence, consequences, and pathophysiology and whether they potentially constitute a syndrome in their own right. Although their findings are of significant importance and raise other compelling discussions, we would like to offer some additional comments for consideration.</p><p>First, their findings highlight our limitations in understanding the pathophysiology of these conditions. It is noteworthy that various medications targeting different mechanisms thought to be involved in the occurrence of delirium are being investigated for prevention and treatment. However, the results remain inconsistent and do not significantly influence severity, duration, or recurrence [<span>2</span>].</p><p>It is also pertinent to question how frequently we underdiagnose cognitive decline upon hospital admission. We know that this decline often goes unnoticed by family members and caregivers, making it less likely to be spontaneously reported in clinical settings. Such an assessment is crucial for investigating a possible connection between frailty and delirium, given that cognitive decline is a common risk factor for both conditions, though it may be less evident for the untrained eye in the earlier stages.</p><p>Moreover, we face a clinical reality—previously highlighted by large studies—regarding the inconsistency of clinical practices in delirium prevention. We must ask whether—were these protocols to be effectively implemented—we could prevent delirium even in frail patients. This would contribute to either reinforcing or undermining the hypothesis of a singular syndrome. Nevertheless, we still lack high-quality clinical evidence regarding the best strategies for preventing delirium, let alone their consistent implementation in clinical practice [<span>3</span>].</p><p>It seems imperative to engage in a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention of these conditions. While this may entail short-term increases in healthcare expenditures for ongoing education of clinical teams, hiring additional staff, and logistical reorganization, studies on delirium suggest that its prevention may result in reduced rates of hospital length of stay and readmission [<span>4</span>]. Moreover, frail patients who develop delirium are more susceptible to a feedback loop of these conditions, which can lead to adverse clinical outcomes, including increased rates of infection, hospitalization, and intensive care unit admissions, as well as the utilization of sedatives.</p><p>It is important to note that although the review by Bellelli et al. contributes to the compilation of studies on the relationship between frailty and delirium, it does not constitute a systematic review conducted with full adherence to established guidelines and the inclusion of multiple databases. Nevertheless, their findings highlight challenges in managing these conditions and future research directions to explore the extent of their interrelationship.</p><p><b>José Lucas Sena da Silva</b>: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. <b>Juliana Caldas</b>: Writing—review and editing; supervision.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"297 2","pages":"230-231"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.20048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.20048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dear Editor,
The review by Bellelli et al. recently published in the Journal of Internal Medicine examines the relationship between frailty and delirium—two geriatric syndromes that significantly impact morbidity, mortality, functionality, cognition, quality of life, healthcare costs, and caregiver burden [1]. The authors assess the current evidence regarding how these conditions share risk factors, prevalence, consequences, and pathophysiology and whether they potentially constitute a syndrome in their own right. Although their findings are of significant importance and raise other compelling discussions, we would like to offer some additional comments for consideration.
First, their findings highlight our limitations in understanding the pathophysiology of these conditions. It is noteworthy that various medications targeting different mechanisms thought to be involved in the occurrence of delirium are being investigated for prevention and treatment. However, the results remain inconsistent and do not significantly influence severity, duration, or recurrence [2].
It is also pertinent to question how frequently we underdiagnose cognitive decline upon hospital admission. We know that this decline often goes unnoticed by family members and caregivers, making it less likely to be spontaneously reported in clinical settings. Such an assessment is crucial for investigating a possible connection between frailty and delirium, given that cognitive decline is a common risk factor for both conditions, though it may be less evident for the untrained eye in the earlier stages.
Moreover, we face a clinical reality—previously highlighted by large studies—regarding the inconsistency of clinical practices in delirium prevention. We must ask whether—were these protocols to be effectively implemented—we could prevent delirium even in frail patients. This would contribute to either reinforcing or undermining the hypothesis of a singular syndrome. Nevertheless, we still lack high-quality clinical evidence regarding the best strategies for preventing delirium, let alone their consistent implementation in clinical practice [3].
It seems imperative to engage in a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention of these conditions. While this may entail short-term increases in healthcare expenditures for ongoing education of clinical teams, hiring additional staff, and logistical reorganization, studies on delirium suggest that its prevention may result in reduced rates of hospital length of stay and readmission [4]. Moreover, frail patients who develop delirium are more susceptible to a feedback loop of these conditions, which can lead to adverse clinical outcomes, including increased rates of infection, hospitalization, and intensive care unit admissions, as well as the utilization of sedatives.
It is important to note that although the review by Bellelli et al. contributes to the compilation of studies on the relationship between frailty and delirium, it does not constitute a systematic review conducted with full adherence to established guidelines and the inclusion of multiple databases. Nevertheless, their findings highlight challenges in managing these conditions and future research directions to explore the extent of their interrelationship.
José Lucas Sena da Silva: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Juliana Caldas: Writing—review and editing; supervision.
亲爱的编辑:Bellelli等人最近发表在《内科学杂志》上的一篇综述研究了虚弱和谵妄之间的关系,这两种老年综合症对发病率、死亡率、功能、认知、生活质量、医疗费用和护理人员负担都有显著影响。作者评估了目前关于这些疾病如何共享风险因素、患病率、后果和病理生理学的证据,以及它们是否有可能构成自身的综合征。虽然他们的发现非常重要,并引发了其他令人信服的讨论,但我们想提供一些额外的评论供考虑。首先,他们的发现强调了我们在理解这些疾病的病理生理学方面的局限性。值得注意的是,目前正在研究针对不同机制的药物,以预防和治疗谵妄的发生。然而,结果仍然不一致,并没有显著影响严重程度、持续时间或复发[2]。这也与我们在入院时低估认知衰退的频率有关。我们知道,这种下降往往被家庭成员和照顾者所忽视,因此在临床环境中不太可能自发报告。这样的评估对于调查虚弱和谵妄之间的可能联系至关重要,因为认知能力下降是这两种情况的共同风险因素,尽管在早期阶段,未经训练的眼睛可能不太明显。此外,我们还面临着一个临床现实——之前的大型研究强调了这一点——关于谵妄预防的临床实践不一致。我们必须要问的是,如果这些协议得到有效的执行,我们是否可以预防精神错乱,即使是在虚弱的病人身上。这将有助于加强或削弱单一综合症的假设。然而,关于预防谵妄的最佳策略,我们仍然缺乏高质量的临床证据,更不用说它们在临床实践中的一致实施了。似乎有必要采取多学科方法来预防这些疾病。虽然这可能会在短期内增加医疗保健支出,用于临床团队的持续教育、雇用额外的工作人员和后勤重组,但对谵妄的研究表明,预防谵妄可能会减少住院时间和再入院率。此外,患有谵妄的虚弱患者更容易受到这些情况的反馈循环的影响,这可能导致不良的临床结果,包括感染、住院和重症监护病房住院率的增加,以及镇静剂的使用。值得注意的是,尽管Bellelli等人的综述有助于编制关于虚弱和谵妄之间关系的研究,但它并不构成完全遵守既定指南并纳入多个数据库的系统综述。然而,他们的发现强调了管理这些条件和未来研究方向的挑战,以探索其相互关系的程度。jos Lucas Sena da Silva:概念化;原创作品草案;写作-审查和编辑。朱莉安娜·卡尔达斯:写作、评论和编辑;监督。作者声明无利益冲突。
期刊介绍:
JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.