Effect of Older Age on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Prolapse Surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kristiana B McLarty, Stephanie W Zuo, Kristina J Warner, Steven R Orris, Tien C Nguyen, Nicole A Meckes, Brigid S Mumford, Kavya Bellam, Richael Rayen, Mary F Ackenbom
{"title":"Effect of Older Age on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Prolapse Surgery.","authors":"Kristiana B McLarty, Stephanie W Zuo, Kristina J Warner, Steven R Orris, Tien C Nguyen, Nicole A Meckes, Brigid S Mumford, Kavya Bellam, Richael Rayen, Mary F Ackenbom","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Little is known about the relationship between older age (≥70 years) and POUR after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate the relationship between age ≥70 years and POUR. Secondarily, we aimed to determine if duration of urinary catheterization differed by age in women with POUR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a dual-center retrospective study on perioperative adverse events in biologic females aged ≥61 years undergoing prolapse surgery. The primary outcome was POUR, defined as a failed retrograde voiding trial requiring bladder catheterization. The secondary outcome was duration of temporary bladder catheterization. We developed a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model, which included relevant variables with P < 0.10 on univariate analyses and a forced age variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort of 2,665 women, mean ± standard deviation age was 71.2 ± 6.7 years, and 54.6% were ≥70 years, POUR occurred in 830 (31.1%) patients. Women with POUR had a lower body mass index and were more likely to have undergone a vaginal prolapse surgery and concomitant hysterectomy/incontinence procedure (P < 0.05). They had higher estimated blood loss (75 vs 50 mL, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, age ≥70 years was not associated with POUR (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI [0.83-1.26]). Age ≥70 years was associated with longer duration of catheterization (5 vs 4 days, P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age was not associated with POUR when controlling for other clinical factors (body mass index, surgical approach, concomitant hysterectomy/incontinence surgery, and estimated blood loss). These factors may affect POUR in older women and should be considered in perioperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after reconstructive pelvic surgery. Little is known about the relationship between older age (≥70 years) and POUR after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the relationship between age ≥70 years and POUR. Secondarily, we aimed to determine if duration of urinary catheterization differed by age in women with POUR.

Study design: This was a secondary analysis of a dual-center retrospective study on perioperative adverse events in biologic females aged ≥61 years undergoing prolapse surgery. The primary outcome was POUR, defined as a failed retrograde voiding trial requiring bladder catheterization. The secondary outcome was duration of temporary bladder catheterization. We developed a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model, which included relevant variables with P < 0.10 on univariate analyses and a forced age variable.

Results: In this cohort of 2,665 women, mean ± standard deviation age was 71.2 ± 6.7 years, and 54.6% were ≥70 years, POUR occurred in 830 (31.1%) patients. Women with POUR had a lower body mass index and were more likely to have undergone a vaginal prolapse surgery and concomitant hysterectomy/incontinence procedure (P < 0.05). They had higher estimated blood loss (75 vs 50 mL, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, age ≥70 years was not associated with POUR (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI [0.83-1.26]). Age ≥70 years was associated with longer duration of catheterization (5 vs 4 days, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Age was not associated with POUR when controlling for other clinical factors (body mass index, surgical approach, concomitant hysterectomy/incontinence surgery, and estimated blood loss). These factors may affect POUR in older women and should be considered in perioperative management.

高龄对脱垂手术后尿潴留的影响
重要性:术后尿潴留(POUR)是骨盆重建手术后常见的。对于年龄较大(≥70岁)与盆腔器官脱垂术后POUR的关系,目前知之甚少。目的:探讨年龄≥70岁与POUR之间的关系。其次,我们的目的是确定尿导尿时间是否随年龄的不同而不同。研究设计:这是一项针对≥61岁接受脱垂手术的生物学型女性围手术期不良事件的双中心回顾性研究的二级分析。主要结局为POUR,定义为需要膀胱导尿的失败逆行排尿试验。次要结果是临时膀胱导尿的持续时间。我们建立了一个逐步多变量logistic回归模型,其中包括单变量分析中P < 0.10的相关变量和强制年龄变量。结果:在2665名女性队列中,平均±标准差年龄为71.2±6.7岁,54.6%年龄≥70岁,830例(31.1%)患者发生POUR。POUR患者的身体质量指数较低,更有可能接受阴道脱垂手术和伴随的子宫切除术/失禁手术(P < 0.05)。他们有更高的估计失血量(75 mL vs 50 mL, P < 0.001)。在多变量logistic回归中,年龄≥70岁与POUR无关(校正优势比1.02,95% CI[0.83-1.26])。年龄≥70岁与置管时间延长相关(5天vs 4天,P < 0.01)。结论:在控制其他临床因素(体重指数、手术方式、伴随子宫切除术/失禁手术和估计失血量)的情况下,年龄与POUR无关。这些因素可能影响老年妇女的POUR,应在围手术期处理中予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信