Anorectal malformation with rectoperineal fistula in males treated with a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) - report of early outcomes.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Thomas O Xu, Inbal Samuk, Christina Feng, Richard J Wood, Andrea Badillo, Marc A Levitt
{"title":"Anorectal malformation with rectoperineal fistula in males treated with a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) - report of early outcomes.","authors":"Thomas O Xu, Inbal Samuk, Christina Feng, Richard J Wood, Andrea Badillo, Marc A Levitt","doi":"10.1055/a-2514-7244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>A novel modification of the cutback procedure, a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) for select male patients with an anorectal malformation and a rectoperineal fistula was recently described which incised only within the limits of the sphincteric ellipse and eliminated an anterior rectal dissection, thus avoiding any possibility of a urethral injury. This report provides longer term postoperative outcomes after PRAA. Method A retrospective, single institution study was performed examining male patients with a rectoperineal fistula between 1/2020-12/2023. PRAA was done only if the rectoperineal fistula was located within the anterior extent of the sphincteric ellipse, which was true for all patients encountered during this study period. We assessed post-operative outcomes, length of stay, time to first feeding, and early stooling patterns. Results Eighteen patients underwent PRAA at a median age of 5.4 months (range 1 day-8 months) with median follow up of fourteen months (range 4-40). Seven patients (39%) were repaired within the first month of life. Thirteen (72%) were repaired primarily and five (28%) had a diverting ostomy placed before referral. There were no instances of wound dehiscence, rectal prolapse, or urethral injury. Two (11%) patients developed an anal stricture requiring dilation or Heineke-Mikulicz anoplasty. All patients resumed feeds on post operative day one. Median discharge was on post operative day one (range 1-6). Fifteen (83%) were utilizing laxatives at their most recent follow up. Conclusions The PRAA avoids any potential urethral injury or perineal dehiscence, has a low rate of anal stenosis (11%), and appears to be applicable to all male patients with a rectoperineal fistula. The technique allows for early return to diet and discharge and can be safely done in the neonatal period or in a delayed fashion without the need for a stoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2514-7244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: A novel modification of the cutback procedure, a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) for select male patients with an anorectal malformation and a rectoperineal fistula was recently described which incised only within the limits of the sphincteric ellipse and eliminated an anterior rectal dissection, thus avoiding any possibility of a urethral injury. This report provides longer term postoperative outcomes after PRAA. Method A retrospective, single institution study was performed examining male patients with a rectoperineal fistula between 1/2020-12/2023. PRAA was done only if the rectoperineal fistula was located within the anterior extent of the sphincteric ellipse, which was true for all patients encountered during this study period. We assessed post-operative outcomes, length of stay, time to first feeding, and early stooling patterns. Results Eighteen patients underwent PRAA at a median age of 5.4 months (range 1 day-8 months) with median follow up of fourteen months (range 4-40). Seven patients (39%) were repaired within the first month of life. Thirteen (72%) were repaired primarily and five (28%) had a diverting ostomy placed before referral. There were no instances of wound dehiscence, rectal prolapse, or urethral injury. Two (11%) patients developed an anal stricture requiring dilation or Heineke-Mikulicz anoplasty. All patients resumed feeds on post operative day one. Median discharge was on post operative day one (range 1-6). Fifteen (83%) were utilizing laxatives at their most recent follow up. Conclusions The PRAA avoids any potential urethral injury or perineal dehiscence, has a low rate of anal stenosis (11%), and appears to be applicable to all male patients with a rectoperineal fistula. The technique allows for early return to diet and discharge and can be safely done in the neonatal period or in a delayed fashion without the need for a stoma.

直肠直肠畸形伴直肠会阴瘘的男性经直肠后进肛门成形术(PRAA)治疗——早期结果报告。
目的:对切除手术的一种新颖的改进,对有肛门直肠畸形和直肠会阴瘘的男性患者进行后直肠推进肛门成形术(PRAA),该手术仅在括约肌椭圆的范围内切开,消除了直肠前夹层,从而避免了尿道损伤的任何可能性。本报告提供了PRAA术后较长期的结果。方法回顾性分析2020年1月- 2023年12月男性直肠会阴瘘患者的单机构研究。只有当直肠会阴瘘管位于括约肌椭圆的前段时才进行PRAA,在本研究期间遇到的所有患者都是如此。我们评估了术后结果、住院时间、首次进食时间和早期大便模式。结果18例患者接受PRAA治疗,中位年龄5.4个月(1 ~ 8个月),中位随访14个月(4 ~ 40个月)。7例患者(39%)在出生后1个月内修复。13例(72%)进行了初步修复,5例(28%)在转诊前进行了转移造口术。没有伤口裂开、直肠脱垂或尿道损伤的病例。2例(11%)患者出现肛门狭窄,需要扩张或Heineke-Mikulicz肛门成形术。所有患者在术后第一天恢复进食。中位出院时间为术后第1天(范围1-6)。15人(83%)在最近的随访中使用泻药。结论PRAA可避免尿道损伤或会阴开裂,肛门狭窄发生率低(11%),适用于所有男性直肠会阴瘘患者。该技术允许早期恢复饮食和出院,可以安全地在新生儿期或以延迟的方式进行,而不需要造口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信