Exploring participant satisfaction with an eHealth intervention for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: Enhancing physiotherapy access in rural Australia
Isabelle Allworth , Georgina Luscombe , Paulo Ferreira , Carlos Mesa-Castrillon
{"title":"Exploring participant satisfaction with an eHealth intervention for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: Enhancing physiotherapy access in rural Australia","authors":"Isabelle Allworth , Georgina Luscombe , Paulo Ferreira , Carlos Mesa-Castrillon","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accessing health services in rural Australia is challenging and innovative solutions to meet residents' needs are required. Research into eHealth is crucial as it offers potential solutions to these challenges. The study aimed to assess participants’ satisfaction and experience with an eHealth physiotherapy intervention at improving physical function for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis in rural Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Telephone surveys collected data on participant satisfaction and experiences. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 0–10, and the data was presented descriptively and compared between groups (eHealth and usual care) using Mann-Whitney U tests. Participant experiences with the pilot trial were gathered using open-ended questions, categorised and presented descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>75/156 (48%) participants responded to the satisfaction survey. Overall satisfaction was significantly higher for the eHealth group, median = 9 [IQR: 8–10] compared with the usual care group, median = 8 [IQR: 5–9] (p = 0.025). Satisfaction was also significantly higher in the eHealth group for all secondary measures in the study, including accessibility to healthcare practitioner (p = 0.001), time to contact physiotherapist (p = 0.011), cost of intervention (p < 0.001) and distance travelled (p < 0.001). For the pilot experiences, inconvenient aspects such as completing forms/administration and travel were significantly higher in the usual care group, while difficulties with exercises, were significantly higher in the eHealth group (p = 0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An eHealth intervention for physiotherapy is acceptable to patients with knee osteoarthritis and low back pain in rural Australia. Future telehealth interventions should pay special attention to participant's exercise workload and motivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 103252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224003473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Accessing health services in rural Australia is challenging and innovative solutions to meet residents' needs are required. Research into eHealth is crucial as it offers potential solutions to these challenges. The study aimed to assess participants’ satisfaction and experience with an eHealth physiotherapy intervention at improving physical function for low back pain and knee osteoarthritis in rural Australia.
Methods
Telephone surveys collected data on participant satisfaction and experiences. Satisfaction was rated on a scale of 0–10, and the data was presented descriptively and compared between groups (eHealth and usual care) using Mann-Whitney U tests. Participant experiences with the pilot trial were gathered using open-ended questions, categorised and presented descriptively.
Results
75/156 (48%) participants responded to the satisfaction survey. Overall satisfaction was significantly higher for the eHealth group, median = 9 [IQR: 8–10] compared with the usual care group, median = 8 [IQR: 5–9] (p = 0.025). Satisfaction was also significantly higher in the eHealth group for all secondary measures in the study, including accessibility to healthcare practitioner (p = 0.001), time to contact physiotherapist (p = 0.011), cost of intervention (p < 0.001) and distance travelled (p < 0.001). For the pilot experiences, inconvenient aspects such as completing forms/administration and travel were significantly higher in the usual care group, while difficulties with exercises, were significantly higher in the eHealth group (p = 0.005).
Conclusions
An eHealth intervention for physiotherapy is acceptable to patients with knee osteoarthritis and low back pain in rural Australia. Future telehealth interventions should pay special attention to participant's exercise workload and motivation.
期刊介绍:
Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.