Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment initiation among bacteriologically negative individuals evaluated for tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502
Sun Kim, Melike Hazal Can, Tefera B Agizew, Andrew F Auld, Maria Elvira Balcells, Stephanie Bjerrum, Keertan Dheda, Susan E Dorman, Aliasgar Esmail, Katherine Fielding, Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro, Colleen F Hanrahan, Wakjira Kebede, Mikashmi Kohli, Anne F Luetkemeyer, Carol Mita, Byron W P Reeve, Denise Rossato Silva, Sedona Sweeney, Grant Theron, Anete Trajman, Anna Vassall, Joshua L Warren, Marcel Yotebieng, Ted Cohen, Nicolas A Menzies
{"title":"Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment initiation among bacteriologically negative individuals evaluated for tuberculosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis.","authors":"Sun Kim, Melike Hazal Can, Tefera B Agizew, Andrew F Auld, Maria Elvira Balcells, Stephanie Bjerrum, Keertan Dheda, Susan E Dorman, Aliasgar Esmail, Katherine Fielding, Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro, Colleen F Hanrahan, Wakjira Kebede, Mikashmi Kohli, Anne F Luetkemeyer, Carol Mita, Byron W P Reeve, Denise Rossato Silva, Sedona Sweeney, Grant Theron, Anete Trajman, Anna Vassall, Joshua L Warren, Marcel Yotebieng, Ted Cohen, Nicolas A Menzies","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, over one-third of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) disease diagnoses are made based on clinical criteria after a negative bacteriological test result. There is limited information on the factors that determine clinicians' decisions to initiate TB treatment when initial bacteriological test results are negative.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We performed a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis using studies conducted between January 2010 and December 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42022287613). We included trials or cohort studies that enrolled individuals evaluated for TB in routine settings. In these studies, participants were evaluated based on clinical examination and routinely used diagnostics and were followed for ≥1 week after the initial test result. We used hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression to identify factors associated with treatment initiation following a negative result on an initial bacteriological test (e.g., sputum smear microscopy (SSM), Xpert MTB/RIF). Multiple factors were positively associated with treatment initiation: male sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.61 (1.31, 1.95)], history of prior TB [aOR 1.36 (1.06, 1.73)], reported cough [aOR 4.62 (3.42, 6.27)], reported night sweats [aOR 1.50 (1.21, 1.90)], and having HIV infection but not on ART [aOR 1.68 (1.23, 2.32)]. Treatment initiation was substantially less likely for individuals testing negative with Xpert [aOR 0.77 (0.62, 0.96)] compared to smear microscopy and declined in more recent years. We were not able assess why clinicians made treatment decisions, as these data were not available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple factors influenced decisions to initiate TB treatment despite negative test results. Clinicians were substantially less likely to treat in the absence of a positive test result when using more sensitive, PCR-based diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"e1004502"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004502","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, over one-third of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) disease diagnoses are made based on clinical criteria after a negative bacteriological test result. There is limited information on the factors that determine clinicians' decisions to initiate TB treatment when initial bacteriological test results are negative.

Methods and findings: We performed a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis using studies conducted between January 2010 and December 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42022287613). We included trials or cohort studies that enrolled individuals evaluated for TB in routine settings. In these studies, participants were evaluated based on clinical examination and routinely used diagnostics and were followed for ≥1 week after the initial test result. We used hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression to identify factors associated with treatment initiation following a negative result on an initial bacteriological test (e.g., sputum smear microscopy (SSM), Xpert MTB/RIF). Multiple factors were positively associated with treatment initiation: male sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.61 (1.31, 1.95)], history of prior TB [aOR 1.36 (1.06, 1.73)], reported cough [aOR 4.62 (3.42, 6.27)], reported night sweats [aOR 1.50 (1.21, 1.90)], and having HIV infection but not on ART [aOR 1.68 (1.23, 2.32)]. Treatment initiation was substantially less likely for individuals testing negative with Xpert [aOR 0.77 (0.62, 0.96)] compared to smear microscopy and declined in more recent years. We were not able assess why clinicians made treatment decisions, as these data were not available.

Conclusions: Multiple factors influenced decisions to initiate TB treatment despite negative test results. Clinicians were substantially less likely to treat in the absence of a positive test result when using more sensitive, PCR-based diagnostics.

细菌学阴性肺结核患者开始接受肺结核治疗的相关因素:个体患者数据荟萃分析。
背景:在全球范围内,超过三分之一的肺结核(TB)疾病诊断是根据细菌学检测结果阴性后的临床标准做出的。当最初的细菌学检测结果为阴性时,关于决定临床医生决定开始结核病治疗的因素的信息有限。方法和发现:我们对2010年1月至2022年12月进行的研究进行了系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析(PROSPERO: CRD42022287613)。我们纳入了在常规环境中接受结核病评估的个体的试验或队列研究。在这些研究中,参与者根据临床检查和常规诊断进行评估,并在初始测试结果后随访≥1周。我们使用分层贝叶斯逻辑回归来确定在初始细菌学测试(例如,痰涂片镜检(SSM), Xpert MTB/RIF)结果阴性后开始治疗的相关因素。多因素与开始治疗呈正相关:男性[调整优势比(aOR) 1.61(1.31, 1.95)]、既往结核病史[aOR 1.36(1.06, 1.73)]、报告咳嗽[aOR 4.62(3.42, 6.27)]、报告盗汗[aOR 1.50(1.21, 1.90)]、感染HIV但未接受ART治疗[aOR 1.68(1.23, 2.32)]。与涂片镜检相比,Xpert检测呈阴性的个体开始治疗的可能性大大降低[aOR 0.77(0.62, 0.96)],并且近年来有所下降。由于没有这些数据,我们无法评估临床医生做出治疗决定的原因。结论:尽管检测结果为阴性,但多种因素影响了开始结核病治疗的决定。当使用更敏感的基于pcr的诊断方法时,临床医生在没有阳性检测结果的情况下进行治疗的可能性大大降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信