A Prospective Comparison of Patient Reported Outcomes After Facial Laser Resurfacing.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Fernando Arias, Zachary Gala, Laura Stetz, Omar Elfanagely, Gregory Greco
{"title":"A Prospective Comparison of Patient Reported Outcomes After Facial Laser Resurfacing.","authors":"Fernando Arias, Zachary Gala, Laura Stetz, Omar Elfanagely, Gregory Greco","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laser resurfacing provides a minimally invasive method for addressing facial/neck skin rejuvenation neglected by modern surgical approaches. Despite its popularity, there is a paucity of outcome data. Herein, we present patient reported outcomes (PROs) to assess the effectiveness of a single surgeon's approach to skin rejuvenation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing first-time facial laser resurfacing (with broadband light and hybrid Er:YAG/thulium laser or hybrid thulium fractional laser alone) between March 2023 - February 2024, performed by the senior author (GG) and laser specialist (Registered Nurse: RN (LS)), were prospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, laser technique/settings, prophylactic medication, and post-procedure management were collected. PROs were assessed during early and late recovery periods, using 10 FACE-Q surveys related to appearance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and adverse effects. A paired student's t-test compared pre- and post-treatment responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 (69 female, two male) patients were identified. The mean age was 56 years [40-78]. Most (>50%) patients experienced tightness, swelling, tenderness, discomfort, and burning in the early recovery period, that dissipated over time. Post-procedure facial (p < 0.001) and skin (p < 0.001) appearance scores improved significantly, whereas that of facial lines insignificantly improved (p = 0.053). Overall, most patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome and their decision to undergo laser resurfacing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients were highly satisfied with both the decision to undergo the procedure and the outcome, particularly in facial appearance and HRQOL. They experienced minimal adverse effects in the early recovery period that dissipated over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laser resurfacing provides a minimally invasive method for addressing facial/neck skin rejuvenation neglected by modern surgical approaches. Despite its popularity, there is a paucity of outcome data. Herein, we present patient reported outcomes (PROs) to assess the effectiveness of a single surgeon's approach to skin rejuvenation.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing first-time facial laser resurfacing (with broadband light and hybrid Er:YAG/thulium laser or hybrid thulium fractional laser alone) between March 2023 - February 2024, performed by the senior author (GG) and laser specialist (Registered Nurse: RN (LS)), were prospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, laser technique/settings, prophylactic medication, and post-procedure management were collected. PROs were assessed during early and late recovery periods, using 10 FACE-Q surveys related to appearance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and adverse effects. A paired student's t-test compared pre- and post-treatment responses.

Results: A total of 71 (69 female, two male) patients were identified. The mean age was 56 years [40-78]. Most (>50%) patients experienced tightness, swelling, tenderness, discomfort, and burning in the early recovery period, that dissipated over time. Post-procedure facial (p < 0.001) and skin (p < 0.001) appearance scores improved significantly, whereas that of facial lines insignificantly improved (p = 0.053). Overall, most patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome and their decision to undergo laser resurfacing.

Conclusion: Patients were highly satisfied with both the decision to undergo the procedure and the outcome, particularly in facial appearance and HRQOL. They experienced minimal adverse effects in the early recovery period that dissipated over time.

面部激光置换后患者报告结果的前瞻性比较。
简介:激光表面修复提供了一种微创的方法来解决被现代外科方法所忽视的面部/颈部皮肤年轻化。尽管它很受欢迎,但缺乏结果数据。在此,我们提出了患者报告的结果(PROs)来评估单一外科医生皮肤再生方法的有效性。方法:前瞻性分析2023年3月- 2024年2月由资深作者(GG)和激光专家(注册护士:RN (LS))进行的首次面部激光表面置换(宽带光和混合Er:YAG/铥激光或单独混合铥分式激光)的成年患者。收集患者人口统计、激光技术/设置、预防性用药和术后管理。在恢复早期和晚期,使用10项与外观、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和不良反应相关的FACE-Q调查来评估PROs。配对学生t检验比较治疗前和治疗后的反应。结果:共发现71例患者,其中女性69例,男性2例。平均年龄56岁[40-78]。大多数(bbb50 %)患者在恢复早期经历紧绷、肿胀、压痛、不适和灼烧,随着时间的推移而消失。术后面部(p < 0.001)和皮肤(p < 0.001)外观评分显著改善,而面部线条评分无显著改善(p = 0.053)。总的来说,大多数患者对治疗结果感到满意,并决定进行激光表面修复。结论:患者对手术的决定和结果都非常满意,特别是在面部外观和HRQOL方面。他们在早期恢复期经历了最小的不良影响,随着时间的推移逐渐消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信