Fernando Arias, Zachary Gala, Laura Stetz, Omar Elfanagely, Gregory Greco
{"title":"A Prospective Comparison of Patient Reported Outcomes After Facial Laser Resurfacing.","authors":"Fernando Arias, Zachary Gala, Laura Stetz, Omar Elfanagely, Gregory Greco","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laser resurfacing provides a minimally invasive method for addressing facial/neck skin rejuvenation neglected by modern surgical approaches. Despite its popularity, there is a paucity of outcome data. Herein, we present patient reported outcomes (PROs) to assess the effectiveness of a single surgeon's approach to skin rejuvenation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing first-time facial laser resurfacing (with broadband light and hybrid Er:YAG/thulium laser or hybrid thulium fractional laser alone) between March 2023 - February 2024, performed by the senior author (GG) and laser specialist (Registered Nurse: RN (LS)), were prospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, laser technique/settings, prophylactic medication, and post-procedure management were collected. PROs were assessed during early and late recovery periods, using 10 FACE-Q surveys related to appearance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and adverse effects. A paired student's t-test compared pre- and post-treatment responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 (69 female, two male) patients were identified. The mean age was 56 years [40-78]. Most (>50%) patients experienced tightness, swelling, tenderness, discomfort, and burning in the early recovery period, that dissipated over time. Post-procedure facial (p < 0.001) and skin (p < 0.001) appearance scores improved significantly, whereas that of facial lines insignificantly improved (p = 0.053). Overall, most patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome and their decision to undergo laser resurfacing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients were highly satisfied with both the decision to undergo the procedure and the outcome, particularly in facial appearance and HRQOL. They experienced minimal adverse effects in the early recovery period that dissipated over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Laser resurfacing provides a minimally invasive method for addressing facial/neck skin rejuvenation neglected by modern surgical approaches. Despite its popularity, there is a paucity of outcome data. Herein, we present patient reported outcomes (PROs) to assess the effectiveness of a single surgeon's approach to skin rejuvenation.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing first-time facial laser resurfacing (with broadband light and hybrid Er:YAG/thulium laser or hybrid thulium fractional laser alone) between March 2023 - February 2024, performed by the senior author (GG) and laser specialist (Registered Nurse: RN (LS)), were prospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, laser technique/settings, prophylactic medication, and post-procedure management were collected. PROs were assessed during early and late recovery periods, using 10 FACE-Q surveys related to appearance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and adverse effects. A paired student's t-test compared pre- and post-treatment responses.
Results: A total of 71 (69 female, two male) patients were identified. The mean age was 56 years [40-78]. Most (>50%) patients experienced tightness, swelling, tenderness, discomfort, and burning in the early recovery period, that dissipated over time. Post-procedure facial (p < 0.001) and skin (p < 0.001) appearance scores improved significantly, whereas that of facial lines insignificantly improved (p = 0.053). Overall, most patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome and their decision to undergo laser resurfacing.
Conclusion: Patients were highly satisfied with both the decision to undergo the procedure and the outcome, particularly in facial appearance and HRQOL. They experienced minimal adverse effects in the early recovery period that dissipated over time.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.