Impact of Massive Transfusion Activation on Time to Delivery of the First Cooler and Patient Survival: A Study of 4,313 Consecutive Activations.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jan-Michael Van Gent, Devi Bavishi, Thomas W Clements, James B Dickey, Rhonda Hobbs, Yu Bai, Lillian S Kao, Bryan A Cotton
{"title":"Impact of Massive Transfusion Activation on Time to Delivery of the First Cooler and Patient Survival: A Study of 4,313 Consecutive Activations.","authors":"Jan-Michael Van Gent, Devi Bavishi, Thomas W Clements, James B Dickey, Rhonda Hobbs, Yu Bai, Lillian S Kao, Bryan A Cotton","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2012, TQIP guidelines for massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) recommended delivery of blood product coolers within 15 minutes. Subsequent work found that every minute delay in cooler arrival was associated with a 5% increased risk of mortality. We sought to assess the impact and sustainability of quality improvement (QI) interventions on time to MTP cooler delivery and their association with trauma patient survival.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In 2009, a QI process was initiated to improve MTP activation and delivery of blood (QI 1). In 2012, TQIP Best Practice Guidelines were implemented at our facility (QI 2). In 2016, we implemented measures to activate our MTP based off prehospital Assessment of Blood Consumption score higher than 1 or any prehospital blood transfusion (QI 3). All patients receiving MTP from January 2009 and December 2022 were included. Patients were compared by year and their respective QI interventions. Primary outcome was time from MTP activation to delivery of the first cooler. A regression model was then constructed to evaluate time to the first cooler on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 52,328 trauma patients were admitted, with 4,313 MTP trauma activations. With each subsequent QI intervention, time to first MTP cooler and mortality both decreased, whereas injury severity increased. Multivariate regression noted that when the time to first cooler could be kept to 8 minutes or less, mortality was reduced by 35% (odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.92; p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With increased MTP activations, delivery of the first cooler was faster and mortality improved. Keeping cooler times under 8 minutes was associated with increased survival. The measurement and monitoring of \"door-to-cooler\" time should be considered as a metric to assess performance and delivery of institutional MTP.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"578-585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2012, TQIP guidelines for massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) recommended delivery of blood product coolers within 15 minutes. Subsequent work found that every minute delay in cooler arrival was associated with a 5% increased risk of mortality. We sought to assess the impact and sustainability of quality improvement (QI) interventions on time to MTP cooler delivery and their association with trauma patient survival.

Study design: In 2009, a QI process was initiated to improve MTP activation and delivery of blood (QI 1). In 2012, TQIP Best Practice Guidelines were implemented at our facility (QI 2). In 2016, we implemented measures to activate our MTP based off prehospital Assessment of Blood Consumption score higher than 1 or any prehospital blood transfusion (QI 3). All patients receiving MTP from January 2009 and December 2022 were included. Patients were compared by year and their respective QI interventions. Primary outcome was time from MTP activation to delivery of the first cooler. A regression model was then constructed to evaluate time to the first cooler on outcomes.

Results: During the study period, 52,328 trauma patients were admitted, with 4,313 MTP trauma activations. With each subsequent QI intervention, time to first MTP cooler and mortality both decreased, whereas injury severity increased. Multivariate regression noted that when the time to first cooler could be kept to 8 minutes or less, mortality was reduced by 35% (odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.92; p = 0.019).

Conclusions: With increased MTP activations, delivery of the first cooler was faster and mortality improved. Keeping cooler times under 8 minutes was associated with increased survival. The measurement and monitoring of "door-to-cooler" time should be considered as a metric to assess performance and delivery of institutional MTP.

大规模输血激活对第一个冷库交付时间和患者生存的影响:一项4313个连续激活的研究。
背景:2012年,大规模输血方案TQIP指南(MTP)建议在15分钟内提供血液制品冷却器。随后的研究发现,气温每延迟一分钟,死亡风险就会增加5%。我们试图评估质量改进(QI)干预措施对MTP冷却分娩时间的影响和可持续性及其与创伤患者生存的关系。研究设计:2009年,启动了质量改进(QI)过程,以改善MTP的激活和血液输送(QI #1)。2012年,我们的工厂实施了TQIP最佳实践指南(QI #2)。2016年,我们实施了基于院前ABC评分bb101或任何院前输血(QI #3)的措施来激活我们的MTP。2009年1月至2022年12月期间接受MTP治疗的所有患者均被纳入研究。将患者按年份和各自的QI干预措施进行比较。主要结果是从MTP激活到第一个冷却器交付的时间。然后构建了一个回归模型来评估第一次冷却结果的时间。结果:在研究期间,52328例创伤患者入院,4313例MTP创伤激活。随着每一次QI干预,到第一次MTP的时间变冷,死亡率下降,而损伤严重程度增加。多因素回归表明,当第一次冷却时间保持在8分钟或更短时,死亡率降低35% (or 0.64, 95% ci 0.44-0.92;p = 0.019)。结论:随着MTP激活的增加,第一个冷却器的递送更快,死亡率降低。保持在8分钟以下的凉爽时间与提高存活率有关。应将“从门到冷却器”时间的测量和监测视为评估机构MTP绩效和交付的度量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信