Digital Meditation to Target Employee Stress: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rachel M Radin, Julie Vacarro, Elena Fromer, Sarah E Ahmadi, Joanna Y Guan, Sarah M Fisher, Sarah D Pressman, John F Hunter, Kate Sweeny, A Janet Tomiyama, Lauren Tiongco Hofschneider, Matthew J Zawadzki, Larisa Gavrilova, Elissa S Epel, Aric A Prather
{"title":"Digital Meditation to Target Employee Stress: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Rachel M Radin, Julie Vacarro, Elena Fromer, Sarah E Ahmadi, Joanna Y Guan, Sarah M Fisher, Sarah D Pressman, John F Hunter, Kate Sweeny, A Janet Tomiyama, Lauren Tiongco Hofschneider, Matthew J Zawadzki, Larisa Gavrilova, Elissa S Epel, Aric A Prather","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mindfulness meditation may improve well-being among employees; however, effects of digital meditation programs are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of digital meditation vs a waiting list condition on general and work-specific stress and whether greater engagement in the intervention moderates these effects.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial included a volunteer sample of adults (aged ≥18 years) employed at a large academic medical center who reported mild to moderate stress, had regular access to a web-connected device, and were fluent in English. Exclusion criteria included being a regular meditator. Participants were recruited from May 16, 2018, through September 28, 2019, and completed baseline, 8-week, and 4-month measures assessing stress, job strain, burnout, work engagement, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomized 1:1 to a digital meditation program or the waiting list control condition. Participants in the intervention group were instructed to complete 10 minutes of meditation per day for 8 weeks. The control group was instructed to continue their normal activities and not add any meditation during the study period.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome measure was change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score at 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included changes in job strain, measured as work effort-reward imbalance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1458 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.54 [10.30] years; 1178 [80.80%] female) were included. Those randomized to meditation (n = 728) vs waiting list (n = 730) showed improvements in PSS (Cohen d, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96) and in all secondary outcome measures (eg, job strain: Cohen d, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.46) at 8 weeks. These improvements were maintained at 4 months after randomization (PSS: Cohen d, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84; job strain: Cohen d, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.50). Those using the app from 5 to 9.9 min/d vs less than 5 min/d showed greater reduction in stress (mean PSS score difference, -6.58; 95% CI, -7.44 to -5.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings suggest that a brief, digital mindfulness-based program is an easily accessible and scalable method for reducing perceptions of stress. Future work should seek to clarify mechanisms by which such interventions contribute to improvements in work-specific well-being.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03527303.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2454435"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Mindfulness meditation may improve well-being among employees; however, effects of digital meditation programs are poorly understood.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of digital meditation vs a waiting list condition on general and work-specific stress and whether greater engagement in the intervention moderates these effects.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial included a volunteer sample of adults (aged ≥18 years) employed at a large academic medical center who reported mild to moderate stress, had regular access to a web-connected device, and were fluent in English. Exclusion criteria included being a regular meditator. Participants were recruited from May 16, 2018, through September 28, 2019, and completed baseline, 8-week, and 4-month measures assessing stress, job strain, burnout, work engagement, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to October 2024.

Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to a digital meditation program or the waiting list control condition. Participants in the intervention group were instructed to complete 10 minutes of meditation per day for 8 weeks. The control group was instructed to continue their normal activities and not add any meditation during the study period.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome measure was change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score at 8 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included changes in job strain, measured as work effort-reward imbalance.

Results: A total of 1458 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.54 [10.30] years; 1178 [80.80%] female) were included. Those randomized to meditation (n = 728) vs waiting list (n = 730) showed improvements in PSS (Cohen d, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96) and in all secondary outcome measures (eg, job strain: Cohen d, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.46) at 8 weeks. These improvements were maintained at 4 months after randomization (PSS: Cohen d, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84; job strain: Cohen d, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.50). Those using the app from 5 to 9.9 min/d vs less than 5 min/d showed greater reduction in stress (mean PSS score difference, -6.58; 95% CI, -7.44 to -5.73).

Conclusions and relevance: The findings suggest that a brief, digital mindfulness-based program is an easily accessible and scalable method for reducing perceptions of stress. Future work should seek to clarify mechanisms by which such interventions contribute to improvements in work-specific well-being.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03527303.

针对员工压力的数字冥想:一项随机临床试验。
重要性:正念冥想可以提高员工的幸福感;然而,人们对数字冥想程序的影响知之甚少。目的:评估数字冥想与等候名单条件对一般和特定工作压力的影响,以及更多的参与干预是否会缓和这些影响。设计、环境和参与者:这项随机临床试验包括在一家大型学术医疗中心工作的成人志愿者样本(年龄≥18岁),他们报告有轻度至中度压力,经常使用联网设备,英语流利。排除标准包括定期冥想。参与者于2018年5月16日至2019年9月28日被招募,并完成了基线、8周和4个月的测量,评估压力、工作压力、倦怠、工作投入、正念、抑郁和焦虑。数据分析时间为2023年3月至2024年10月。干预:参与者以1:1的比例随机分配到数字冥想项目或等候名单控制条件。干预组的参与者被要求每天完成10分钟的冥想,持续8周。对照组被要求继续他们的正常活动,在研究期间不进行任何冥想。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为8周时感知压力量表(PSS)评分的变化。次要结果测量包括工作压力的变化,以工作努力-回报不平衡来衡量。结果:共有1458名参与者(平均[SD]年龄35.54[10.30]岁;纳入1178例[80.80%]例女性)。随机分配到冥想组(n = 728)和等候组(n = 730)的患者PSS有所改善(Cohen d, 0.85;95% CI, 0.73-0.96)和所有次要结果测量(例如,工作压力:Cohen d, 0.34;95% CI, 0.23-0.46)。这些改善在随机分组后4个月保持不变(PSS: Cohen d, 0.71;95% ci, 0.59-0.84;工作压力:Cohen d, 0.37;95% ci, 0.25-0.50)。那些每天使用5到9.9分钟的人比每天使用不到5分钟的人表现出更大的压力减轻(平均PSS评分差,-6.58;95% CI, -7.44至-5.73)。结论和相关性:研究结果表明,一个简短的、基于正念的数字程序是一种容易获得和可扩展的减少压力感知的方法。今后的工作应设法澄清这些干预措施有助于改善具体工作福利的机制。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03527303。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信