Compare the Efficacy of Bolus Low Dose Ketamine Versus Bolus plus Infusion Low Dose Ketamine on Pain Management in Emergency Department: A randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Reza Azizkhani, Ali Sanaei, Farhad Heydari, Saeed Majidinejad, Keihan Golshani, Fateme Sadeghi, Pardis Rafiei
{"title":"Compare the Efficacy of Bolus Low Dose Ketamine Versus Bolus plus Infusion Low Dose Ketamine on Pain Management in Emergency Department: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Reza Azizkhani, Ali Sanaei, Farhad Heydari, Saeed Majidinejad, Keihan Golshani, Fateme Sadeghi, Pardis Rafiei","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ketamine is a promising drug for analgesia in emergency medicine, but a high rate of side effects is a barrier to whispered usage. We hypothesized that ketamine bolus followed by ketamine infusion would provide a more even and longer duration of analgesia and lower rates of side effects in comparison to bolus-only administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-blinded, clinical trial. Eligible traumatic patients were randomly allocated with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥6 in two study groups. The first group received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of saline 0.9% over the next 30 minutes (bolus only group). The second group was given 0.15 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg over the next 30 minutes (bolus and infusion group). The primary outcome was to measure the average reduction in pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 patients were recruited. Of these, 77 patients were analyzed. Both groups achieved a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (All p-values<0.001). After 30 minutes, patients in the bolus and infusion group reported lower pain scores in all intervals with lower rates of need for rescue analgesia but this difference was not statistically significant. Vital signs remained stable during the study in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in any side effect (p-value< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both administration protocols resulted in significant pain control. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ketamine is a promising drug for analgesia in emergency medicine, but a high rate of side effects is a barrier to whispered usage. We hypothesized that ketamine bolus followed by ketamine infusion would provide a more even and longer duration of analgesia and lower rates of side effects in comparison to bolus-only administration.

Methods: This was a double-blinded, clinical trial. Eligible traumatic patients were randomly allocated with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥6 in two study groups. The first group received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of saline 0.9% over the next 30 minutes (bolus only group). The second group was given 0.15 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg over the next 30 minutes (bolus and infusion group). The primary outcome was to measure the average reduction in pain scores.

Results: 80 patients were recruited. Of these, 77 patients were analyzed. Both groups achieved a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (All p-values<0.001). After 30 minutes, patients in the bolus and infusion group reported lower pain scores in all intervals with lower rates of need for rescue analgesia but this difference was not statistically significant. Vital signs remained stable during the study in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in any side effect (p-value< 0.05).

Conclusion: Both administration protocols resulted in significant pain control. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects.

急诊科低剂量氯胺酮丸与低剂量氯胺酮丸加输液治疗疼痛的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景:氯胺酮是一种很有前途的急救镇痛药物,但其高副作用率阻碍了它的广泛应用。我们假设氯胺酮丸后氯胺酮输注与单丸给药相比,可以提供更均匀和更长的镇痛持续时间和更低的副作用率。方法:双盲临床试验。符合条件的创伤患者随机分为两组,NRS评分≥6分。第一组在1分钟内接受0.3 mg/kg氯胺酮剂量,随后在接下来的30分钟内输注0.9%生理盐水(仅丸剂组)。第二组在1分钟内给予0.15 mg/kg氯胺酮,随后在30分钟内输注0.15 mg/kg氯胺酮(丸组和输注组)。主要结果是测量疼痛评分的平均减少。结果:共纳入80例患者。其中,对77例患者进行了分析。两组患者的疼痛评分均有统计学意义的降低(均p值)。结论:两种给药方案均能显著控制疼痛。在镇痛疗效和副作用方面,各组间无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信