The Landscape of Experimental Cardiac Arrest Research Models in Rats: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Georgios Mavrovounis, Maria Mermiri, Ioannis Drivas, Konstantinos Drivas, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Sotirios G Zarogiannis, Ioannis Pantazopoulos
{"title":"The Landscape of Experimental Cardiac Arrest Research Models in Rats: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles.","authors":"Georgios Mavrovounis, Maria Mermiri, Ioannis Drivas, Konstantinos Drivas, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Sotirios G Zarogiannis, Ioannis Pantazopoulos","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on experimental cardiac arrest models in rats, identifying key contributors, publication trends, research themes, and collaboration networks. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the Web of Science (WoS) database on June 11, 2024, using keywords related to cardiac arrest and rat models. The top 100 most cited articles were analyzed using the Biblioshiny web application from the Bibliometrix R package (version 4.2.3), categorized by primary research focus. Articles, published from 1980 to 2022, involved 416 authors across 44 journals, averaging 106.7 citations each. Primary research themes were neurology (72%), organ transplantation (7%), cardiovascular system (6%), CPR outcomes after local anesthetic toxicity (4%), and other topics (5%). The United States, Japan, and Germany were leading contributors, with limited international collaborations. Major clusters identified included \"Cerebral Ischemia and Outcomes,\" \"Brain Imaging Metrics,\" and \"Blood Brain Barrier\". The most commonly used methodologies for cardiac arrest induction were asphyxia, induction by magnesium or potassium chloride and electrical stimulation. This first bibliometric analysis on the topic reveals a dominance of neuroscience in experimental cardiac arrest models in rats. High-impact journals like the \"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism\" play critical roles in disseminating significant research. The study highlights substantial gaps in global research engagement, with minimal contributions from lower-income countries and few international collaborations. This analysis provides a roadmap for future research directions and opportunities for more extensive international and interdisciplinary collaboration, always with a focus on scientific rigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on experimental cardiac arrest models in rats, identifying key contributors, publication trends, research themes, and collaboration networks. A comprehensive literature search was performed on the Web of Science (WoS) database on June 11, 2024, using keywords related to cardiac arrest and rat models. The top 100 most cited articles were analyzed using the Biblioshiny web application from the Bibliometrix R package (version 4.2.3), categorized by primary research focus. Articles, published from 1980 to 2022, involved 416 authors across 44 journals, averaging 106.7 citations each. Primary research themes were neurology (72%), organ transplantation (7%), cardiovascular system (6%), CPR outcomes after local anesthetic toxicity (4%), and other topics (5%). The United States, Japan, and Germany were leading contributors, with limited international collaborations. Major clusters identified included "Cerebral Ischemia and Outcomes," "Brain Imaging Metrics," and "Blood Brain Barrier". The most commonly used methodologies for cardiac arrest induction were asphyxia, induction by magnesium or potassium chloride and electrical stimulation. This first bibliometric analysis on the topic reveals a dominance of neuroscience in experimental cardiac arrest models in rats. High-impact journals like the "Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism" play critical roles in disseminating significant research. The study highlights substantial gaps in global research engagement, with minimal contributions from lower-income countries and few international collaborations. This analysis provides a roadmap for future research directions and opportunities for more extensive international and interdisciplinary collaboration, always with a focus on scientific rigor.

大鼠心脏骤停实验研究模型的景观:对100篇被引用最多的文章的文献计量学分析。
本研究旨在对100篇被引用最多的大鼠实验性心脏骤停模型文章进行文献计量学分析,确定主要贡献者、出版趋势、研究主题和合作网络。我们于2024年6月11日在Web of Science (WoS)数据库中检索了与心脏骤停和大鼠模型相关的关键词,进行了全面的文献检索。使用Bibliometrix R软件包(4.2.3版)中的Biblioshiny web应用程序分析了被引用次数最多的前100篇文章,并根据主要研究重点进行了分类。这些文章发表于1980年至2022年,涉及44种期刊的416位作者,平均每人被引用106.7次。主要研究主题为神经病学(72%)、器官移植(7%)、心血管系统(6%)、局麻毒性后CPR结果(4%)和其他主题(5%)。美国、日本和德国是主要捐助国,国际合作有限。确定的主要集群包括“脑缺血和结果”、“脑成像指标”和“血脑屏障”。诱导心脏骤停最常用的方法是窒息、氯化镁或氯化钾诱导和电刺激。这一主题的首次文献计量学分析揭示了神经科学在大鼠心脏骤停实验模型中的主导地位。像《脑血流与代谢杂志》这样的高影响力期刊在传播重要研究方面发挥着关键作用。该研究强调了全球研究参与方面的巨大差距,低收入国家的贡献微乎其微,国际合作也很少。这一分析为未来的研究方向提供了路线图,并为更广泛的国际和跨学科合作提供了机会,始终关注科学的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信