Comparative Safety of Istradefylline Among Parkinson Disease Adjunctive Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yasar Torres-Yaghi, Joyce Qian, Hannah Cummings, Hiroo Shimoda, Satoru Ito, Sarah Batson, Stephen Mitchell, Fernando Pagan
{"title":"Comparative Safety of Istradefylline Among Parkinson Disease Adjunctive Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.","authors":"Yasar Torres-Yaghi, Joyce Qian, Hannah Cummings, Hiroo Shimoda, Satoru Ito, Sarah Batson, Stephen Mitchell, Fernando Pagan","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjunctive therapies to treat OFF episodes resulting from long-term levodopa treatment in Parkinson disease (PD) are hampered by safety and tolerability issues. Istradefylline offers an alternative mechanism (adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) and therefore potentially improved tolerability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of PD adjuncts published in 2011 was updated to include randomized controlled trials published from January 1, 2010-April 15, 2019. Pairwise meta-analyses were updated, and Bucher indirect comparisons were used to generate estimates of relative safety, presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparators versus istradefylline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven randomized controlled trials involving 11,517 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Relative to istradefylline, dopamine agonists and catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors had statistically significant higher odds of dyskinesia and somnolence. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors had significantly higher odds of hypotension. Amantadine extended-release (ER) had statistically significant higher odds of hallucination, orthostatic hypotension, insomnia, and withdrawals due to adverse events. All interventions combined had significantly higher odds of dyskinesia versus istradefylline 20 mg and somnolence versus istradefylline 40 mg. Considering overall incidence of adverse events, COMT inhibitors and amantadine ER had statistically significant higher odds versus both istradefylline doses (COMT versus istradefylline 40 mg, OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.75; versus istradefylline 20 mg, OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.72; amantadine ER versus istradefylline 40 mg, OR: 3.45; 95% CI: 1.85, 6.25; versus istradefylline 20 mg, OR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.82, 6.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Istradefylline was associated with a generally favorable safety profile relative to other adjunct medications in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":"48 1","pages":"7-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adjunctive therapies to treat OFF episodes resulting from long-term levodopa treatment in Parkinson disease (PD) are hampered by safety and tolerability issues. Istradefylline offers an alternative mechanism (adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) and therefore potentially improved tolerability.

Methods: A systematic review of PD adjuncts published in 2011 was updated to include randomized controlled trials published from January 1, 2010-April 15, 2019. Pairwise meta-analyses were updated, and Bucher indirect comparisons were used to generate estimates of relative safety, presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for comparators versus istradefylline.

Results: Fifty-seven randomized controlled trials involving 11,517 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Relative to istradefylline, dopamine agonists and catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors had statistically significant higher odds of dyskinesia and somnolence. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors had significantly higher odds of hypotension. Amantadine extended-release (ER) had statistically significant higher odds of hallucination, orthostatic hypotension, insomnia, and withdrawals due to adverse events. All interventions combined had significantly higher odds of dyskinesia versus istradefylline 20 mg and somnolence versus istradefylline 40 mg. Considering overall incidence of adverse events, COMT inhibitors and amantadine ER had statistically significant higher odds versus both istradefylline doses (COMT versus istradefylline 40 mg, OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.75; versus istradefylline 20 mg, OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.72; amantadine ER versus istradefylline 40 mg, OR: 3.45; 95% CI: 1.85, 6.25; versus istradefylline 20 mg, OR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.82, 6.25).

Conclusion: Istradefylline was associated with a generally favorable safety profile relative to other adjunct medications in this study.

isstradefylline在帕金森病辅助治疗中的比较安全性:随机对照研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:长期左旋多巴治疗导致的帕金森病(PD) OFF发作的辅助治疗受到安全性和耐受性问题的阻碍。iststradefylline提供了一种替代机制(腺苷A2A受体拮抗剂),因此可能提高耐受性。方法:更新2011年发表的PD辅助疗法的系统综述,纳入2010年1月1日至2019年4月15日发表的随机对照试验。对两两荟萃分析进行了更新,并使用Bucher间接比较来产生相对安全性的估计,以比较物与isstradefylline的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。结果:meta分析纳入了57项随机对照试验,涉及11517例患者。相对于iststradefylline,多巴胺激动剂和儿茶酚- o -甲基转移酶(COMT)抑制剂有统计学意义上更高的运动障碍和嗜睡的几率。单胺氧化酶- b抑制剂发生低血压的几率显著增高。金刚烷胺缓释片(ER)出现幻觉、体位性低血压、失眠和因不良事件而停药的几率在统计学上有显著性提高。所有干预措施加在一起,出现运动障碍和嗜睡的几率都明显高于20毫克的司他替林和40毫克的司他替林。考虑到不良事件的总发生率,COMT抑制剂和金刚烷胺ER与两种剂量的伊斯特defylline相比具有统计学上显著的更高的几率(COMT vs伊斯特defylline 40mg, OR: 1.33;95% ci: 1.03, 1.75;与isstradefylline 20mg相比,OR: 1.32;95% ci: 1.01, 1.72;金刚烷胺ER vs iststradefylline 40mg, OR: 3.45;95% ci: 1.85, 6.25;对比司他替林20mg, OR: 3.33;95% ci: 1.82, 6.25)。结论:在本研究中,相对于其他辅助药物,isstradefylline具有普遍有利的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信