The relationships of plasma profenofos and ethanol concentrations to clinical outcome in acute profenofos self-poisoning.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Jeevan Dhanarisi, Michael Eddleston, Klintean Wunnapuk, Indika Gawarammana, Fahim Mohamed
{"title":"The relationships of plasma profenofos and ethanol concentrations to clinical outcome in acute profenofos self-poisoning.","authors":"Jeevan Dhanarisi, Michael Eddleston, Klintean Wunnapuk, Indika Gawarammana, Fahim Mohamed","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2437119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients acutely self-poisoned with organophosphorus insecticides have co-ingested ethanol. Currently, profenofos 50% emulsifiable concentrate (EC50) is commonly ingested for self-harm in Sri Lanka. Clinical experience suggests that ethanol co-ingestion makes management more difficult. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationships between plasma ethanol concentration, plasma profenofos concentration and its toxicokinetics, and clinical outcome in acute profenofos self-poisoning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinical data, including a history of ethanol ingestion and blood samples, were prospectively collected from all cases of acute poisoning with profenofos EC50 presenting to Teaching Hospital Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, over four years. Plasma samples were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to quantify the ethanol (<i>n</i> = 99) and profenofos (<i>n</i> = 30 [15 with ethanol, 15 without ethanol]) concentrations. The PKSolver program was used to calculate the toxicokinetic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 99 patients (male 78/99) with acute profenofos self-poisoning, 50 reported a history of ethanol co-ingestion. Plasma from 44 of 99 profenofos-poisoned patients had detectable ethanol concentrations. No statistical difference was observed between the mortality in the ethanol group and the no ethanol group (5/44 [11.4%] versus 3/55 [5.5%]; <i>P</i> = 0.461). Similarly, the median half-lives of plasma profenofos absorption in the ethanol and no ethanol groups (0.1 h and 0.1 h, respectively; time 0-24 h) were not statistically different (<i>P</i> = 0.6594). However, the median half-life of plasma profenofos elimination was significantly longer in the ethanol group than the no ethanol group (23.1 h and 9.9 h, respectively; time 0-24 h; <i>P</i> = 0.0002). According to the regression analysis, the half-life of plasma profenofos elimination was longer by 29.4 h in the ethanol group (<i>P</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>No significant differences in outcomes, including death and endotracheal intubation rates, were found between those who did and did not co-ingest ethanol. No differences were found in toxicokinetic variables between the ethanol and no ethanol groups, but the ethanol group had a longer elimination half-life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The co-ingestion of ethanol leads to a slowing of the elimination kinetics of profenofos. However, the study did not reveal a significant impact of ethanol co-ingestion on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2437119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many patients acutely self-poisoned with organophosphorus insecticides have co-ingested ethanol. Currently, profenofos 50% emulsifiable concentrate (EC50) is commonly ingested for self-harm in Sri Lanka. Clinical experience suggests that ethanol co-ingestion makes management more difficult. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationships between plasma ethanol concentration, plasma profenofos concentration and its toxicokinetics, and clinical outcome in acute profenofos self-poisoning.

Methods: Demographic and clinical data, including a history of ethanol ingestion and blood samples, were prospectively collected from all cases of acute poisoning with profenofos EC50 presenting to Teaching Hospital Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, over four years. Plasma samples were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to quantify the ethanol (n = 99) and profenofos (n = 30 [15 with ethanol, 15 without ethanol]) concentrations. The PKSolver program was used to calculate the toxicokinetic parameters.

Results: Of 99 patients (male 78/99) with acute profenofos self-poisoning, 50 reported a history of ethanol co-ingestion. Plasma from 44 of 99 profenofos-poisoned patients had detectable ethanol concentrations. No statistical difference was observed between the mortality in the ethanol group and the no ethanol group (5/44 [11.4%] versus 3/55 [5.5%]; P = 0.461). Similarly, the median half-lives of plasma profenofos absorption in the ethanol and no ethanol groups (0.1 h and 0.1 h, respectively; time 0-24 h) were not statistically different (P = 0.6594). However, the median half-life of plasma profenofos elimination was significantly longer in the ethanol group than the no ethanol group (23.1 h and 9.9 h, respectively; time 0-24 h; P = 0.0002). According to the regression analysis, the half-life of plasma profenofos elimination was longer by 29.4 h in the ethanol group (P = 0.013).

Discussion: No significant differences in outcomes, including death and endotracheal intubation rates, were found between those who did and did not co-ingest ethanol. No differences were found in toxicokinetic variables between the ethanol and no ethanol groups, but the ethanol group had a longer elimination half-life.

Conclusion: The co-ingestion of ethanol leads to a slowing of the elimination kinetics of profenofos. However, the study did not reveal a significant impact of ethanol co-ingestion on clinical outcomes.

急性丙诺福自我中毒患者血浆丙诺福和乙醇浓度与临床预后的关系。
导言:许多急性有机磷杀虫剂自中毒的患者都同时摄入了乙醇。目前,在斯里兰卡,50%的丙诺福乳化液(EC50)通常被用于自残。临床经验表明,乙醇共摄入使治疗更加困难。因此,我们旨在确定急性丙诺福自我中毒患者血浆乙醇浓度、血浆丙诺福浓度及其毒性动力学与临床结局的关系。方法:前瞻性收集斯里兰卡Peradeniya教学医院4年内所有急性丙诺福EC50中毒病例的人口学和临床资料,包括乙醇摄入史和血液样本。采用气相色谱-质谱联用分析血浆样品,定量测定乙醇(n = 99)和丙诺福斯(n = 30[15个含乙醇,15个不含乙醇])浓度。采用PKSolver程序计算毒理动力学参数。结果:99例急性丙诺福自身中毒患者(男性78/99)中,50例报告共摄入乙醇史。99名丙诺威中毒患者中有44人的血浆中可检测到乙醇浓度。乙醇组与无乙醇组死亡率无统计学差异(5/44 [11.4%]vs 3/55 [5.5%]);p = 0.461)。同样,乙醇组和无乙醇组血浆丙诺福吸收的中位半衰期分别为0.1 h和0.1 h;时间0 ~ 24 h),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.6594)。然而,乙醇组血浆丙诺福消除的中位半衰期明显长于无乙醇组(分别为23.1 h和9.9 h);时间0-24小时;p = 0.0002)。经回归分析,乙醇组血浆丙诺福消除半衰期延长29.4 h (P = 0.013)。讨论:在合并和未合并摄入乙醇的患者之间,包括死亡和气管插管率在内的结果没有显著差异。乙醇组和无乙醇组的毒理动力学变量没有差异,但乙醇组的消除半衰期较长。结论:乙醇的共同摄入导致丙诺福的消除动力学减慢。然而,该研究并未揭示乙醇共摄入对临床结果的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信