Aberrant E-cadherin Expression in Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: A Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of N-terminal, Extracellular, and C-terminal E-cadherin Domains.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Rita Canas-Marques, Ana Blanca, Raquel Graça-Lopes, Inês Carvalho, David G Pinto, Maria Antónia Vasconcelos, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Isabel Fonseca
{"title":"Aberrant E-cadherin Expression in Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: A Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of N-terminal, Extracellular, and C-terminal E-cadherin Domains.","authors":"Rita Canas-Marques, Ana Blanca, Raquel Graça-Lopes, Inês Carvalho, David G Pinto, Maria Antónia Vasconcelos, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Isabel Fonseca","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>E-cadherin (E-cad) immunohistochemistry is commonly used to distinguish lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) from ductal carcinoma in situ in histologically uncertain or ambiguous cases. Although most LCIS cases show an absence of E-cad expression on the neoplastic cell membranes, some show aberrant E-cad expression which can lead to diagnostic confusion. Awareness and understanding of the frequency, patterns, and distribution of aberrant E-cad staining in LCIS is crucial to achieving a correct diagnosis. We studied 55 LCIS cases diagnosed on core needle biopsy, classified each case by WHO subtype (classic, pleomorphic, or florid), and evaluated the frequency and patterns of aberrant E-cad expression using 3 different E-cad antibodies targeting the N-terminal (N), extracellular (EC), and C-terminal domains (C). Aberrant E-cad expression in one or more of the E-cad domains was identified in 17 cases (31%) and was significantly more frequent among LCIS variants (10/19, 56%) than among classic cases (7/36, 19.4%) (P=0.02). Among these 17 cases, aberrant E-cad expression was seen for all 3 domains in 10 cases, for EC+C in 4, for EC+N in 2, and for N only in 1. These results indicate that about one-third of cases of LCIS can show aberrant E-cad expression, that this is more common in variants than classic types of LCIS, and that this may be seen in different E-cad domains, most often in combination. These different patterns of aberrant E-cad expression may reflect different mechanisms of E-cad alterations in LCIS, the underlying nature of which merits further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-cadherin (E-cad) immunohistochemistry is commonly used to distinguish lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) from ductal carcinoma in situ in histologically uncertain or ambiguous cases. Although most LCIS cases show an absence of E-cad expression on the neoplastic cell membranes, some show aberrant E-cad expression which can lead to diagnostic confusion. Awareness and understanding of the frequency, patterns, and distribution of aberrant E-cad staining in LCIS is crucial to achieving a correct diagnosis. We studied 55 LCIS cases diagnosed on core needle biopsy, classified each case by WHO subtype (classic, pleomorphic, or florid), and evaluated the frequency and patterns of aberrant E-cad expression using 3 different E-cad antibodies targeting the N-terminal (N), extracellular (EC), and C-terminal domains (C). Aberrant E-cad expression in one or more of the E-cad domains was identified in 17 cases (31%) and was significantly more frequent among LCIS variants (10/19, 56%) than among classic cases (7/36, 19.4%) (P=0.02). Among these 17 cases, aberrant E-cad expression was seen for all 3 domains in 10 cases, for EC+C in 4, for EC+N in 2, and for N only in 1. These results indicate that about one-third of cases of LCIS can show aberrant E-cad expression, that this is more common in variants than classic types of LCIS, and that this may be seen in different E-cad domains, most often in combination. These different patterns of aberrant E-cad expression may reflect different mechanisms of E-cad alterations in LCIS, the underlying nature of which merits further studies.

小叶原位癌中E-cadherin的异常表达:n端、细胞外和c端E-cadherin结构域的综合免疫组织化学评价
E-cad免疫组化通常用于在组织学不确定或不明确的病例中区分小叶原位癌(LCIS)和导管原位癌。虽然大多数LCIS病例的肿瘤细胞膜上没有E-cad表达,但有些病例的E-cad表达异常,可能导致诊断上的混淆。认识和了解LCIS中异常E-cad染色的频率、模式和分布对于获得正确诊断至关重要。我们研究了55例经核心针活检确诊的LCIS病例,按WHO亚型(典型、多形性或花斑)对每个病例进行了分类,并使用针对N端(N)、胞外(EC)和C端(C)结构域的3种不同E-cad抗体评估了异常E-cad表达的频率和模式。在17例病例(31%)中发现了一个或多个E-cad结构域的E-cad表达异常,LCIS变异型病例(10/19,56%)的发病率明显高于典型病例(7/36,19.4%)(P=0.02)。这些结果表明,约三分之一的LCIS病例可出现E-cad异常表达,变异型LCIS比典型型LCIS更常见,而且可能出现在不同的E-cad结构域,最常见的是组合表达。这些不同的E-cad异常表达模式可能反映了LCIS中E-cad改变的不同机制,其根本性质值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities. Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信