Advancing Principled Pharmacoepidemiologic Research to Support Regulatory and Healthcare Decision Making: The Era of Real-World Evidence

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rohini K. Hernandez, Cathy W. Critchlow, Nancy Dreyer, Timothy L. Lash, Robert F. Reynolds, Henrik T. Sørensen, Jeff L. Lange, Nicolle M. Gatto, Rachel E. Sobel, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai, Marieke Schoonen, Jeffrey S. Brown, Jennifer B. Christian, M. Alan Brookhart, Brian D. Bradbury
{"title":"Advancing Principled Pharmacoepidemiologic Research to Support Regulatory and Healthcare Decision Making: The Era of Real-World Evidence","authors":"Rohini K. Hernandez,&nbsp;Cathy W. Critchlow,&nbsp;Nancy Dreyer,&nbsp;Timothy L. Lash,&nbsp;Robert F. Reynolds,&nbsp;Henrik T. Sørensen,&nbsp;Jeff L. Lange,&nbsp;Nicolle M. Gatto,&nbsp;Rachel E. Sobel,&nbsp;Edward Chia-Cheng Lai,&nbsp;Marieke Schoonen,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Brown,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Christian,&nbsp;M. Alan Brookhart,&nbsp;Brian D. Bradbury","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A compilation of factors over the past decade—including the availability of increasingly large and rich healthcare datasets, advanced technologies to extract unstructured information from health records and digital sources, advancement of principled study design and analytic methods to emulate clinical trials, and frameworks to support transparent study conduct—has ushered in a new era of real-world evidence (RWE). This review article describes the evolution of the RWE era, including pharmacoepidemiologic methods designed to support causal inferences regarding treatment effects, the role of regulators and other health authorities in establishing distributed real-world data networks enabling analytics at scale, and the many global guidance documents on principled methods of producing RWE. This article also highlights the growing opportunity for RWE to support decision making by regulators, health technology assessment groups, clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders and provides examples of influential RWE studies. RWE holds promise to address important questions that clinical trials typically do not answer about treatment benefits and risks, and to ultimately impact public health by helping to guide decision making across the healthcare ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"117 4","pages":"927-937"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A compilation of factors over the past decade—including the availability of increasingly large and rich healthcare datasets, advanced technologies to extract unstructured information from health records and digital sources, advancement of principled study design and analytic methods to emulate clinical trials, and frameworks to support transparent study conduct—has ushered in a new era of real-world evidence (RWE). This review article describes the evolution of the RWE era, including pharmacoepidemiologic methods designed to support causal inferences regarding treatment effects, the role of regulators and other health authorities in establishing distributed real-world data networks enabling analytics at scale, and the many global guidance documents on principled methods of producing RWE. This article also highlights the growing opportunity for RWE to support decision making by regulators, health technology assessment groups, clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders and provides examples of influential RWE studies. RWE holds promise to address important questions that clinical trials typically do not answer about treatment benefits and risks, and to ultimately impact public health by helping to guide decision making across the healthcare ecosystem.

Abstract Image

推进原则药物流行病学研究,以支持监管和医疗保健决策:现实世界证据的时代。
过去十年的因素汇编——包括越来越大和丰富的医疗保健数据集的可用性,从健康记录和数字来源中提取非结构化信息的先进技术,原则性研究设计的进步和模拟临床试验的分析方法,以及支持透明研究行为的框架——开创了一个真实世界证据(RWE)的新时代。这篇综述文章描述了RWE时代的演变,包括旨在支持关于治疗效果的因果推断的药物流行病学方法,监管机构和其他卫生当局在建立能够大规模分析的分布式真实世界数据网络中的作用,以及关于生产RWE的原则方法的许多全球指导文件。本文还强调了RWE支持监管机构、卫生技术评估小组、临床医生、患者和其他利益相关者做出决策的机会越来越多,并提供了有影响力的RWE研究的例子。RWE有望解决临床试验通常无法回答的有关治疗益处和风险的重要问题,并最终通过帮助指导整个医疗保健生态系统的决策来影响公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信