Theresa Wittrien, Anne Rühle, Christin Elgert, Ilka Mathar, Peter Sandner, Sönke Behrends
{"title":"Runcaciguat activates soluble guanylyl cyclase via the histidine essential for heme binding and nitric oxide activation.","authors":"Theresa Wittrien, Anne Rühle, Christin Elgert, Ilka Mathar, Peter Sandner, Sönke Behrends","doi":"10.1016/j.bcp.2025.116739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) is a well-established pharmacological target for the treatment of acute angina pectoris, pulmonary hypertension and heart failure. Histidine 105 in the heme binding pocket of sGC is a crucial residue for heme binding and natural enzyme activation by NO. It was assumed that the heme-free sGC mutants α<sub>1</sub>/β<sub>1</sub>H105F and α<sub>1</sub>/β<sub>1</sub>H105A were valuable research tools for studying NO independent sGC activators. These mutants have been used in drug screening and animal models. We confirm that the first generation of sGC activators cinaciguat and BAY 60-2770 activate the α<sub>1</sub>/β<sub>1</sub>H105F and α<sub>1</sub>/β<sub>1</sub>H105A mutants. In contrast, we show that the second generation sGC activators runcaciguat and BAY 543 only activate heme-free sGC when the β<sub>1</sub>H105 residue is present. By testing runcaciguat in β<sub>1</sub> H105F knock-in mice, we confirm this histidine-dependency in vivo. We propose a novel classification of sGC activators, distinguishing between the histidine-dependent activators runcaciguat and BAY 543 and the histidine-independent activators cinaciguat, BAY 60-2770 and BI703704. The histidine-dependency of some of the sGC activators provides a compelling rationale for a re-evaluation of previous research and drug development programs based on sGC histidine mutants. Whether the classification of sGC activators based on the activation mechanism also makes a therapeutic difference needs to be clarified in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8806,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical pharmacology","volume":"232 ","pages":"116739"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2025.116739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) is a well-established pharmacological target for the treatment of acute angina pectoris, pulmonary hypertension and heart failure. Histidine 105 in the heme binding pocket of sGC is a crucial residue for heme binding and natural enzyme activation by NO. It was assumed that the heme-free sGC mutants α1/β1H105F and α1/β1H105A were valuable research tools for studying NO independent sGC activators. These mutants have been used in drug screening and animal models. We confirm that the first generation of sGC activators cinaciguat and BAY 60-2770 activate the α1/β1H105F and α1/β1H105A mutants. In contrast, we show that the second generation sGC activators runcaciguat and BAY 543 only activate heme-free sGC when the β1H105 residue is present. By testing runcaciguat in β1 H105F knock-in mice, we confirm this histidine-dependency in vivo. We propose a novel classification of sGC activators, distinguishing between the histidine-dependent activators runcaciguat and BAY 543 and the histidine-independent activators cinaciguat, BAY 60-2770 and BI703704. The histidine-dependency of some of the sGC activators provides a compelling rationale for a re-evaluation of previous research and drug development programs based on sGC histidine mutants. Whether the classification of sGC activators based on the activation mechanism also makes a therapeutic difference needs to be clarified in the future.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Pharmacology publishes original research findings, Commentaries and review articles related to the elucidation of cellular and tissue function(s) at the biochemical and molecular levels, the modification of cellular phenotype(s) by genetic, transcriptional/translational or drug/compound-induced modifications, as well as the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of xenobiotics and drugs, the latter including both small molecules and biologics.
The journal''s target audience includes scientists engaged in the identification and study of the mechanisms of action of xenobiotics, biologics and drugs and in the drug discovery and development process.
All areas of cellular biology and cellular, tissue/organ and whole animal pharmacology fall within the scope of the journal. Drug classes covered include anti-infectives, anti-inflammatory agents, chemotherapeutics, cardiovascular, endocrinological, immunological, metabolic, neurological and psychiatric drugs, as well as research on drug metabolism and kinetics. While medicinal chemistry is a topic of complimentary interest, manuscripts in this area must contain sufficient biological data to characterize pharmacologically the compounds reported. Submissions describing work focused predominately on chemical synthesis and molecular modeling will not be considered for review.
While particular emphasis is placed on reporting the results of molecular and biochemical studies, research involving the use of tissue and animal models of human pathophysiology and toxicology is of interest to the extent that it helps define drug mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy.