Routine childhood rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis can be cost effective in low- and middle-income countries.

Vaccine Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126703
Adam John Ritchie, Aronrag Meeyai, Caroline Trotter, Alexander D Douglas
{"title":"Routine childhood rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis can be cost effective in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Adam John Ritchie, Aronrag Meeyai, Caroline Trotter, Alexander D Douglas","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-exposure prophylactic rabies vaccination (PrEP) is advised for travellers to countries with high rabies incidence, but rarely available for local residents. Some studies suggest poor cost-effectiveness of PrEP in such settings, but have generally focused upon post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) cost savings as the main benefit of PrEP, without considering lives saved by PrEP efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of use of rabies PrEP, against an alternative of using only PEP, by adapting a decision-tree model previously used to inform Gavi's investment in rabies PEP. We consider scenarios including: a range of PrEP efficacies in individuals unable to access PEP; PrEP costs significantly below current prices (through single-dose approaches, inclusion in childhood vaccination schedules, increased manufacturing volume and/or new low-cost products); and variable rabies exposure risk and PEP access. We also present results from a simplified model, designed for ease of understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modelled ICERs were <1000 USD per quality adjusted life year (QALY) across a range of plausible combinations of rabies exposure risk, PEP access, PrEP cost and PrEP efficacy. If PrEP efficacy exceeds 50 % over 15 years, we estimate ICERs <500 USD/QALY where rabies incidence ≥3 per 100,000 per year and cost of vaccination is ≤5 USD/child. Under scenarios with lower rabies incidence of around 0.3 per 100,000 per year, due either to more limited exposure or greater access to PEP, ICERs <3000 USD may still be achieved even if PrEP efficacy is as low as 30 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine childhood PrEP may be cost-effective in settings with modest willingness-to-pay, and rabies exposure risks plausible across much of Africa and South Asia. Cost-effectiveness requires low-cost PrEP regimes and some efficacy of PrEP in individuals unable to access PEP. Under such conditions, PrEP may be an attractive additional tool in the fight against rabies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"47 ","pages":"126703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pre-exposure prophylactic rabies vaccination (PrEP) is advised for travellers to countries with high rabies incidence, but rarely available for local residents. Some studies suggest poor cost-effectiveness of PrEP in such settings, but have generally focused upon post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) cost savings as the main benefit of PrEP, without considering lives saved by PrEP efficacy.

Methods: We compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of use of rabies PrEP, against an alternative of using only PEP, by adapting a decision-tree model previously used to inform Gavi's investment in rabies PEP. We consider scenarios including: a range of PrEP efficacies in individuals unable to access PEP; PrEP costs significantly below current prices (through single-dose approaches, inclusion in childhood vaccination schedules, increased manufacturing volume and/or new low-cost products); and variable rabies exposure risk and PEP access. We also present results from a simplified model, designed for ease of understanding.

Results: Modelled ICERs were <1000 USD per quality adjusted life year (QALY) across a range of plausible combinations of rabies exposure risk, PEP access, PrEP cost and PrEP efficacy. If PrEP efficacy exceeds 50 % over 15 years, we estimate ICERs <500 USD/QALY where rabies incidence ≥3 per 100,000 per year and cost of vaccination is ≤5 USD/child. Under scenarios with lower rabies incidence of around 0.3 per 100,000 per year, due either to more limited exposure or greater access to PEP, ICERs <3000 USD may still be achieved even if PrEP efficacy is as low as 30 %.

Conclusions: Routine childhood PrEP may be cost-effective in settings with modest willingness-to-pay, and rabies exposure risks plausible across much of Africa and South Asia. Cost-effectiveness requires low-cost PrEP regimes and some efficacy of PrEP in individuals unable to access PEP. Under such conditions, PrEP may be an attractive additional tool in the fight against rabies.

在中低收入国家,常规的儿童狂犬病暴露前预防措施具有成本效益。
背景:建议前往狂犬病高发国家的旅行者接种暴露前预防性狂犬病疫苗 (PrEP),但当地居民很少接种。一些研究表明,在这种情况下,PrEP 的成本效益较低,但一般都将接触后预防(PEP)成本的节省作为 PrEP 的主要效益,而没有考虑到 PrEP 的疗效所挽救的生命:我们比较了使用狂犬病 PrEP 和仅使用 PEP 的增量成本效益比 (ICER),方法是调整以前用于为 Gavi 投资狂犬病 PEP 提供信息的决策树模型。我们考虑的方案包括:在无法获得 PEP 的个人中使用一系列 PrEP 效果;PrEP 成本大大低于当前价格(通过单剂量方法、纳入儿童疫苗接种计划、增加生产量和/或新的低成本产品);以及可变的狂犬病暴露风险和 PEP 获取途径。我们还介绍了为便于理解而设计的简化模型的结果:结果:模拟的 ICER 为在支付意愿不高、非洲和南亚大部分地区狂犬病暴露风险合理的情况下,常规儿童 PrEP 可能具有成本效益。要实现成本效益,就必须采用低成本的 PrEP 方案,并且 PrEP 对无法获得 PEP 的人具有一定的疗效。在这样的条件下,PrEP 可能会成为抗击狂犬病的一个有吸引力的额外工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信