Concomitant Waldenström Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma and Non-Immunoglobulin M Plasma Cell Neoplasm.

Yue Zhao, Philip Petersen, Sophie Stuart, Jiaqi He, Yaping Ju, Luis F Carrillo, Eric D Carlsen, Yi Xie, Alireza Ghezavati, Imran Siddiqi, Ling Zhang, Endi Wang
{"title":"Concomitant Waldenström Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma and Non-Immunoglobulin M Plasma Cell Neoplasm.","authors":"Yue Zhao, Philip Petersen, Sophie Stuart, Jiaqi He, Yaping Ju, Luis F Carrillo, Eric D Carlsen, Yi Xie, Alireza Ghezavati, Imran Siddiqi, Ling Zhang, Endi Wang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0270-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The co-occurrence of plasma cell neoplasm (PCN) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is rare, and their clonal relationship remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of concomitant LPL/PCN.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data of 14 cases.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Three patients initially presented with immunoglobulin (Ig) M paraprotein, 1 with IgG paraprotein, and 10 had simultaneous diagnoses of PCN and LPL. In 13 cases, flow cytometry detected both LPL and PCN in marrow biopsies. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry highlighted the 2 neoplastic populations, demonstrating an increased proportion of plasma cells and their expression of cyclin D1, CD56, and/or a non-IgM isotype restriction. All cases exhibited discordant heavy-chain isotypes between LPL and PCN. Thirteen of the 14 cases (92.9%) had concordant light-chain restrictions between the 2 neoplasms, and the remaining case (7.1%) showed discordant light-chain restrictions. Of the 12 patients with follow-up, 5 were treated with myeloma regimens, 2 with LPL regimens, 3 with combined therapy, and 2 with observation alone. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 146 months (median, 12.5 months). One patient died of PCN progression, one died of comorbidity, and 10 patients were alive with or without disease. Survival analysis showed no significant difference from the control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The discordant heavy-chain isotype restrictions between PCN and LPL suggest biclonal B-cell neoplasms, which is supported by PCN's phenotypic distinction, such as the expression of cyclin D1 and/or CD56. However, our series exhibited a tendency toward concordant light-chain restrictions between the 2 neoplasms, raising the possibility that PCN may evolve from LPL through class switching.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0270-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: The co-occurrence of plasma cell neoplasm (PCN) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is rare, and their clonal relationship remains unclear.

Objective.—: To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of concomitant LPL/PCN.

Design.—: Retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data of 14 cases.

Results.—: Three patients initially presented with immunoglobulin (Ig) M paraprotein, 1 with IgG paraprotein, and 10 had simultaneous diagnoses of PCN and LPL. In 13 cases, flow cytometry detected both LPL and PCN in marrow biopsies. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry highlighted the 2 neoplastic populations, demonstrating an increased proportion of plasma cells and their expression of cyclin D1, CD56, and/or a non-IgM isotype restriction. All cases exhibited discordant heavy-chain isotypes between LPL and PCN. Thirteen of the 14 cases (92.9%) had concordant light-chain restrictions between the 2 neoplasms, and the remaining case (7.1%) showed discordant light-chain restrictions. Of the 12 patients with follow-up, 5 were treated with myeloma regimens, 2 with LPL regimens, 3 with combined therapy, and 2 with observation alone. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 146 months (median, 12.5 months). One patient died of PCN progression, one died of comorbidity, and 10 patients were alive with or without disease. Survival analysis showed no significant difference from the control.

Conclusions.—: The discordant heavy-chain isotype restrictions between PCN and LPL suggest biclonal B-cell neoplasms, which is supported by PCN's phenotypic distinction, such as the expression of cyclin D1 and/or CD56. However, our series exhibited a tendency toward concordant light-chain restrictions between the 2 neoplasms, raising the possibility that PCN may evolve from LPL through class switching.

合并Waldenström巨球蛋白血症/淋巴浆细胞性淋巴瘤和非免疫球蛋白M浆细胞肿瘤。
背景浆细胞瘤(PCN)和淋巴浆细胞性淋巴瘤(LPL)同时出现的情况非常罕见,它们之间的克隆关系仍不清楚:评估LPL/PCN并发症的临床病理特征:回顾性分析14例患者的临床和实验室数据:3例患者最初表现为免疫球蛋白(Ig)M副蛋白,1例为IgG副蛋白,10例同时诊断为PCN和LPL。在 13 例患者中,流式细胞术在骨髓活检中检测到了 LPL 和 PCN。此外,免疫组化也突出了这两种肿瘤细胞群,显示浆细胞比例增加,并表达细胞周期蛋白 D1、CD56 和/或非 IgM 同型限制。所有病例均显示 LPL 和 PCN 的重链同型不一致。14 例中有 13 例(92.9%)两种肿瘤的轻链限制一致,其余一例(7.1%)表现出不一致的轻链限制。在随访的12名患者中,5人接受了骨髓瘤治疗方案,2人接受了LPL治疗方案,3人接受了联合治疗,2人仅接受了观察。随访时间从 2 个月到 146 个月不等(中位数为 12.5 个月)。一名患者死于 PCN 进展,一名死于合并症,10 名患者有病或无病存活。生存期分析表明,与对照组相比没有明显差异:PCN和LPL之间不一致的重链同型限制提示为双克隆B细胞肿瘤,PCN的表型区分(如细胞周期蛋白D1和/或CD56的表达)也支持这一结论。然而,我们的系列研究显示,这两种肿瘤之间的轻链限制趋于一致,这就提出了 PCN 可能是通过类别转换从 LPL 演变而来的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信