Understanding ICU Nursing Knowledge, Perceived Barriers, and Facilitators of Sepsis Recognition and Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001200
Katherine A Kissel, Karla D Krewulak, Thérèse G Poulin, Ken Kuljit S Parhar, Daniel J Niven, Vanessa M Doiron, Kirsten M Fiest
{"title":"Understanding ICU Nursing Knowledge, Perceived Barriers, and Facilitators of Sepsis Recognition and Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Katherine A Kissel, Karla D Krewulak, Thérèse G Poulin, Ken Kuljit S Parhar, Daniel J Niven, Vanessa M Doiron, Kirsten M Fiest","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Nursing workforce changes, knowledge translation gaps, and environmental/organizational barriers may impact sepsis recognition and management within the ICU.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To: 1) evaluate current ICU nursing knowledge of sepsis recognition and management, 2) explore individual and environmental or organizational factors impacting nursing recognition and management of sepsis using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and 3) describe perceived barriers and facilitators to nursing recognition and management of patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional survey was administered to nurses working in four general system ICUs between October 24, 2023, and January 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Quantitative questions (single/multiple choice, true/false, and Likert-based questions eliciting agreement with a statement) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended questions exploring barriers and facilitators to sepsis recognition and management were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 completed survey responses were retained. Most nurses agreed early sepsis detection saves lives (n = 98, 97%, TDF domain Beliefs About Consequences) and that nursing care can improve patient outcomes (n = 97, 96%, TDF domain Optimism). Fewer nurses agreed it was easy to identify priority sepsis interventions based on order urgency (n = 53, 53%, TDF domain Memory, Attention, and Decision Processes). Reoccurring barriers and facilitators to sepsis recognition and management were commonly identified across the TDF domains of Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context and Resources, and Social Influences, including competency deficit (with facilitators including support from colleagues), workload or staffing, and equipment or resource availability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>ICU nursing sepsis recognition and management is impacted by numerous individual, environmental, and organizational factors. Recommendations include enhanced competency development or support, utilization of structured reinforcement measures (involving the interdisciplinary team and imploring the use of integrative technologies), and addressing equipment/resource-related gaps. Future research and improvement initiatives should use a theory-informed approach to overcome the pervasive, complex challenges impeding timely sepsis recognition and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 1","pages":"e1200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Nursing workforce changes, knowledge translation gaps, and environmental/organizational barriers may impact sepsis recognition and management within the ICU.

Objectives: To: 1) evaluate current ICU nursing knowledge of sepsis recognition and management, 2) explore individual and environmental or organizational factors impacting nursing recognition and management of sepsis using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and 3) describe perceived barriers and facilitators to nursing recognition and management of patients with sepsis.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional survey was administered to nurses working in four general system ICUs between October 24, 2023, and January 30, 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Quantitative questions (single/multiple choice, true/false, and Likert-based questions eliciting agreement with a statement) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended questions exploring barriers and facilitators to sepsis recognition and management were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: A total of 101 completed survey responses were retained. Most nurses agreed early sepsis detection saves lives (n = 98, 97%, TDF domain Beliefs About Consequences) and that nursing care can improve patient outcomes (n = 97, 96%, TDF domain Optimism). Fewer nurses agreed it was easy to identify priority sepsis interventions based on order urgency (n = 53, 53%, TDF domain Memory, Attention, and Decision Processes). Reoccurring barriers and facilitators to sepsis recognition and management were commonly identified across the TDF domains of Knowledge, Skills, Environmental Context and Resources, and Social Influences, including competency deficit (with facilitators including support from colleagues), workload or staffing, and equipment or resource availability.

Conclusion and relevance: ICU nursing sepsis recognition and management is impacted by numerous individual, environmental, and organizational factors. Recommendations include enhanced competency development or support, utilization of structured reinforcement measures (involving the interdisciplinary team and imploring the use of integrative technologies), and addressing equipment/resource-related gaps. Future research and improvement initiatives should use a theory-informed approach to overcome the pervasive, complex challenges impeding timely sepsis recognition and management.

了解ICU护理知识、感知障碍和脓毒症识别和管理的促进因素:一项横断面研究。
重要性:护理人员队伍的变化、知识转化方面的差距以及环境/组织方面的障碍可能会影响 ICU 内败血症的识别和管理:目的1)评估当前 ICU 护理人员对脓毒症识别和管理的知识;2)使用理论领域框架(TDF)探讨影响脓毒症识别和管理的个人和环境或组织因素;3)描述脓毒症患者识别和管理的护理障碍和促进因素:这项横断面调查的对象是 2023 年 10 月 24 日至 2024 年 1 月 30 日期间在四家综合系统重症监护室工作的护士:采用描述性统计方法对定量问题(单选/多选、真/假和基于 Likert 的问题,这些问题旨在征得对某一陈述的同意)进行分析。采用定性内容分析法对探讨败血症识别和管理的障碍和促进因素的开放式问题进行了分析:结果:共保留了 101 份完整的调查回复。大多数护士同意早期败血症检测可挽救生命(n = 98,97%,TDF 领域 "对后果的信念"),护理可改善患者预后(n = 97,96%,TDF 领域 "乐观")。较少护士认为根据订单紧急程度确定优先脓毒症干预措施很容易(n = 53,53%,TDF 领域记忆、注意力和决策过程)。在 "知识、技能、环境背景和资源 "以及 "社会影响 "等TDF领域中,脓毒症识别和管理的障碍和促进因素被普遍认为是重复出现的,包括能力不足(促进因素包括同事的支持)、工作量或人员配备以及设备或资源的可用性:ICU 败血症的护理识别和管理受到众多个人、环境和组织因素的影响。建议包括加强能力培养或支持、利用结构化强化措施(让跨学科团队参与并鼓励使用综合技术)以及解决设备/资源相关的差距。未来的研究和改进措施应采用理论指导的方法,以克服阻碍及时识别和管理败血症的普遍而复杂的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信