W-SITTING IN CHILDHOOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

IF 0.5 4区医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS

Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243206e279277

David Gonçalves Nordon, Caroline de Gouveia Buff Passone, Clovis Artur Almeida da Silva, Patrícia Moreno Grangeiro

{"title":"W-SITTING IN CHILDHOOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.","authors":"David Gonçalves Nordon, Caroline de Gouveia Buff Passone, Clovis Artur Almeida da Silva, Patrícia Moreno Grangeiro","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243206e279277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Despite the lack of science-based evidence, many specialists and non-specialists consider W-sitting detrimental to children. This systematic review aims to find evidence on W-sitting.Methods: This review was registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42022313341. During January 2023, the term \"W-sitting\" and its variations were searched on the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, PEDro, and Cochrane. Duplicate articles and those that addressed themes other than W-sitting were removed.Results: This review found 3641 articles, removed 614 duplicates, and excluded 3021 for focusing on subjects other than W-sitting. It included seven studies for analysis, one of which was a narrative review and two were methodologically inadequate cross-sectional to evaluate the causal effect in W-sitting. Another article evaluated muscular activation in adults according to sitting position. The last article found no causal relation between W-sitting and developmental dysplasia of the hip.Conclusion: This review found no scientific evidence advise against W-sitting in children and no association with hip dysplasia. Moreover, muscular activation remains the same, regardless of the position chosen for sitting. Level of evidence III, review article.","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"32 6","pages":"e279277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243206e279277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite the lack of science-based evidence, many specialists and non-specialists consider W-sitting detrimental to children. This systematic review aims to find evidence on W-sitting.

Methods: This review was registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42022313341. During January 2023, the term "W-sitting" and its variations were searched on the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, PEDro, and Cochrane. Duplicate articles and those that addressed themes other than W-sitting were removed.

Results: This review found 3641 articles, removed 614 duplicates, and excluded 3021 for focusing on subjects other than W-sitting. It included seven studies for analysis, one of which was a narrative review and two were methodologically inadequate cross-sectional to evaluate the causal effect in W-sitting. Another article evaluated muscular activation in adults according to sitting position. The last article found no causal relation between W-sitting and developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Conclusion: This review found no scientific evidence advise against W-sitting in children and no association with hip dysplasia. Moreover, muscular activation remains the same, regardless of the position chosen for sitting. Level of evidence III, review article.

查看原文本刊更多论文

童年坐着：一项系统回顾。

目的：尽管缺乏以科学为依据的证据，但许多专家和非专家都认为W-坐姿对儿童有害。本系统综述旨在寻找有关 W 坐月子的证据：本综述在 PROSPERO 上注册，注册号为 CRD42022313341。2023 年 1 月期间，在以下数据库中搜索了 "W-sitting "一词及其变体：PubMed、Medline、Embase、PEDro 和 Cochrane。删除了重复文章和涉及 W-sitting 以外主题的文章：本综述发现了 3641 篇文章，删除了 614 篇重复文章，并排除了 3021 篇关注 W 坐姿以外主题的文章。共纳入 7 项研究进行分析，其中 1 项为叙述性综述，2 项为方法不当的横断面研究，无法评估 W 坐姿的因果效应。另一篇文章根据坐姿评估了成年人的肌肉激活情况。最后一篇文章发现，久坐与髋关节发育不良之间没有因果关系：本综述没有发现科学证据表明儿童不宜采用久坐姿势，也没有发现久坐姿势与髋关节发育不良有关。此外，无论选择哪种坐姿，肌肉激活都是一样的。证据等级 III，综述文章。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Orthopedics-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

14.30%

发文量

审稿时长

25 weeks

期刊介绍： A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.