DRopEridol for Abdominal pain in the emergency department for Morphine Equivalent Reduction. The DREAMER study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Brock R Townsend, Sarah T Malka, Sean G Di Paola, Andrea E Nisly, Brian W Gilbert
{"title":"DRopEridol for Abdominal pain in the emergency department for Morphine Equivalent Reduction. The DREAMER study.","authors":"Brock R Townsend, Sarah T Malka, Sean G Di Paola, Andrea E Nisly, Brian W Gilbert","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Droperidol is a dopamine-2 receptor antagonist in the class of butyrophenone antipsychotics with antiemetic, sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In the postoperative setting, droperidol provides an opioid sparing effect and decreases nausea/vomiting. Another butyrophenone antipsychotic, haloperidol, has been shown to reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of droperidol for undifferentiated abdominal pain reduces the amount of MME administered in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Patients must have had two separate encounters for abdominal pain, one encounter where they received droperidol and one encounter where they did not receive droperidol but did receive an opioid. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered between the two separate patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included utilization rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects (including arrhythmias and extrapyramidal symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients with self-matched encounters were evaluated. A majority of the patients were female (33/50, 66 %) with a median age of 38 years old. All doses of droperidol were intravenous and the majority of patients received a dose of 2.5 mg (34/50, 68 %; range 1.25-5 mg). Non-droperidol encounters received significantly more MME compared to droperidol encounters (19.4 MME [IQR 12-30] vs 10 MME [IQR 0-20], p-value 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences between the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients presenting to the ED for abdominal pain, droperidol administration resulted in a significant reduction in MME administration. Future research should include prospective studies, comparison of droperidol to haloperidol, and investigate droperidol use beyond the ED for these encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"31-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Droperidol is a dopamine-2 receptor antagonist in the class of butyrophenone antipsychotics with antiemetic, sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In the postoperative setting, droperidol provides an opioid sparing effect and decreases nausea/vomiting. Another butyrophenone antipsychotic, haloperidol, has been shown to reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of droperidol for undifferentiated abdominal pain reduces the amount of MME administered in the ED.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Patients must have had two separate encounters for abdominal pain, one encounter where they received droperidol and one encounter where they did not receive droperidol but did receive an opioid. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered between the two separate patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included utilization rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects (including arrhythmias and extrapyramidal symptoms).

Results: Fifty patients with self-matched encounters were evaluated. A majority of the patients were female (33/50, 66 %) with a median age of 38 years old. All doses of droperidol were intravenous and the majority of patients received a dose of 2.5 mg (34/50, 68 %; range 1.25-5 mg). Non-droperidol encounters received significantly more MME compared to droperidol encounters (19.4 MME [IQR 12-30] vs 10 MME [IQR 0-20], p-value 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences between the secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Among patients presenting to the ED for abdominal pain, droperidol administration resulted in a significant reduction in MME administration. Future research should include prospective studies, comparison of droperidol to haloperidol, and investigate droperidol use beyond the ED for these encounters.

哌利多用于急诊科减少吗啡当量的腹痛。“梦想者”研究。
简介屈培利多是一种多巴胺-2受体拮抗剂,属于丁酰苯丙酮类抗精神病药,具有止吐、镇静、镇痛和抗焦虑作用。在术后环境中,屈哌立多具有疏通阿片类药物的作用,并能减少恶心/呕吐。另一种丁酰苯丙酮类抗精神病药物氟哌啶醇在急诊科(ED)用于治疗腹痛时,可减少吗啡毫当量(MME)的用量。本研究旨在评估使用氟哌啶醇治疗未分化腹痛是否会减少急诊科的吗啡用量:这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了年龄≥18 岁、因未分化腹痛到急诊科就诊的患者。患者必须有两次因腹痛就诊的经历,其中一次接受了屈哌利多治疗,另一次没有接受屈哌利多治疗,但接受了阿片类药物治疗。主要结果是两次单独就诊之间所使用的 MME 的差异。次要结果包括抢救性止吐药、抢救性镇痛药的使用率、入院率、住院时间和不良反应(包括心律失常和锥体外系症状):对 50 名自我匹配的患者进行了评估。大多数患者为女性(33/50,66%),中位年龄为 38 岁。所有剂量的屈哌醇均为静脉注射,大多数患者接受的剂量为 2.5 毫克(34/50,68%;范围 1.25-5 毫克)。与接受过屈博利多治疗的患者相比,接受过非屈博利多治疗的患者接受的屈博利多剂量明显更高(19.4 毫克[IQR 12-30] vs 10 毫克[IQR 0-20],P 值 0.0002)。次要结果之间的差异无统计学意义:结论:在因腹痛而到急诊室就诊的患者中,使用屈哌利多可显著减少 MME 的用量。未来的研究应包括前瞻性研究、屈哌利多与氟哌啶醇的比较,并调查在急诊室以外使用屈哌利多的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信