Cervical extensor muscle activity during neck tasks in individuals with and without neck pain: A systematic review.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
David Colman, Stéphanie Grosdent, Christophe Demoulin, Cédric Schwartz, Nancy Durieux, Pierre Pesesse, Charlotte Beaudart, Barbara Cagnie, Antoine Dewalque, Marc Vanderthommen
{"title":"Cervical extensor muscle activity during neck tasks in individuals with and without neck pain: A systematic review.","authors":"David Colman, Stéphanie Grosdent, Christophe Demoulin, Cédric Schwartz, Nancy Durieux, Pierre Pesesse, Charlotte Beaudart, Barbara Cagnie, Antoine Dewalque, Marc Vanderthommen","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of neck pain, neck muscle activity adapts through diverse regional coordination modifications during tasks. Although patterns of cervical flexor muscle impairment are well-documented, patterns in the cervical extensor muscles are less clear, hindering assessment and treatment. Despite studies revealing adaptations in the cervical extensor muscles, outcome measure heterogeneity complicates interpretation, particularly between superficial and deep muscles. To address this, we conducted a systematic review comparing neck extensor muscle activity between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups during tasks, aiming to inform clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the cervical extensor muscle activity during neck tasks between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, using complementary examination tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Up to January 2024, experimental studies assessing cervical extensor muscle activity during neck tasks in adults with idiopathic or traumatic neck pain, or cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls were included. Study selection involved 2 blinded reviewers. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Embase), reference lists, and relevant reviews were screened. Data extraction focused on the results of the between-group motor activity comparisons. Critical appraisal used the JBI appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 932 participants and reporting 170 comparative assessments of 8 muscle groups, encompassing 4 main motor activity outcomes: recruitment, timing, fatigue, and directional activation. Significant differences were noted for motor recruitment in 51 % of comparisons, for timing in 35 %, and fatigue in 33 %, with consistent differences in directional activation. Impaired activity in individuals with neck pain compared to those without was found in 47 % of comparisons for superficial muscles and 65 % for deep muscles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Motor activity adaptations during neck tasks appear to be unpredictable in individuals with neck pain, with a tendency for change in the deep cervical extensor muscles. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings, considering various contraction parameters, multiple muscle analyses, and several motor activity outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Review CRD42022285864.</p>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"68 3","pages":"101910"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of neck pain, neck muscle activity adapts through diverse regional coordination modifications during tasks. Although patterns of cervical flexor muscle impairment are well-documented, patterns in the cervical extensor muscles are less clear, hindering assessment and treatment. Despite studies revealing adaptations in the cervical extensor muscles, outcome measure heterogeneity complicates interpretation, particularly between superficial and deep muscles. To address this, we conducted a systematic review comparing neck extensor muscle activity between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups during tasks, aiming to inform clinical practice.

Objectives: To compare the cervical extensor muscle activity during neck tasks between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, using complementary examination tools.

Methods: Up to January 2024, experimental studies assessing cervical extensor muscle activity during neck tasks in adults with idiopathic or traumatic neck pain, or cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls were included. Study selection involved 2 blinded reviewers. Electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Embase), reference lists, and relevant reviews were screened. Data extraction focused on the results of the between-group motor activity comparisons. Critical appraisal used the JBI appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.

Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 932 participants and reporting 170 comparative assessments of 8 muscle groups, encompassing 4 main motor activity outcomes: recruitment, timing, fatigue, and directional activation. Significant differences were noted for motor recruitment in 51 % of comparisons, for timing in 35 %, and fatigue in 33 %, with consistent differences in directional activation. Impaired activity in individuals with neck pain compared to those without was found in 47 % of comparisons for superficial muscles and 65 % for deep muscles.

Conclusions: Motor activity adaptations during neck tasks appear to be unpredictable in individuals with neck pain, with a tendency for change in the deep cervical extensor muscles. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings, considering various contraction parameters, multiple muscle analyses, and several motor activity outcomes.

Trial registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Review CRD42022285864.

颈伸肌活动在颈部任务的个人有或没有颈部疼痛:一个系统的回顾。
背景:在颈部疼痛的情况下,颈部肌肉活动通过任务过程中不同区域的协调修改来适应。虽然颈椎屈肌损伤的模式有充分的文献记载,但颈椎伸肌损伤的模式不太清楚,这阻碍了评估和治疗。尽管研究揭示了颈伸肌的适应性,但结果测量的异质性使解释复杂化,特别是在浅表和深层肌肉之间。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项系统的综述,比较了有症状组和无症状组在任务期间的颈部伸肌活动,旨在为临床实践提供信息。目的:利用辅助检查工具,比较有症状组和无症状组在颈部工作时的颈伸肌活动。方法:截至2024年1月,与健康对照者相比,纳入了评估特发性或外伤性颈部疼痛或颈源性头痛的成人颈部任务时颈伸肌活动的实验研究。研究选择包括2位盲法审稿人。筛选电子数据库(Medline、Scopus和Embase)、参考文献列表和相关综述。数据提取的重点是组间运动活动比较的结果。批判性评估使用JBI评估清单进行分析性横断面研究。结果:23项研究符合纳入标准,涉及932名参与者,报告了8个肌肉群的170个比较评估,包括4个主要的运动活动结果:招募、定时、疲劳和定向激活。在51%的比较中,运动恢复有显著差异,在35%的比较中,在33%的比较中,疲劳有显著差异,在定向激活方面也有一致的差异。与没有颈部疼痛的人相比,有颈部疼痛的人在浅表肌肉和深层肌肉的对比中分别有47%和65%的人活动受损。结论:颈部疼痛患者在颈部工作时的运动活动适应似乎是不可预测的,有改变颈深伸肌的趋势。考虑到不同的收缩参数、多种肌肉分析和多种运动活动结果,需要进一步的高质量研究来证实这些发现。试验注册:PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统评价注册号CRD42022285864。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信