River co-learning arenas: principles and practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-creation and multi-scalar (inter)action.

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Local Environment Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215
Daniele Tubino de Souza, Lena Hommes, Arjen Wals, Jaime Hoogesteger, Rutgerd Boelens, Bibiana Duarte-Abadía, Juan Pablo Hidalgo-Bastidas, Edward Huijbens, Leila M Harris, Diana Suhardiman, Lieke Melsen, Tom Buijse, Fabio de Castro, Leontien Cremers, Barbara Hogenboom, Mariela Garcia Vargas, Denisse Roca-Servat, Gert Jan Veldwisch, K J Joy
{"title":"River co-learning arenas: principles and practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-creation and multi-scalar (inter)action.","authors":"Daniele Tubino de Souza, Lena Hommes, Arjen Wals, Jaime Hoogesteger, Rutgerd Boelens, Bibiana Duarte-Abadía, Juan Pablo Hidalgo-Bastidas, Edward Huijbens, Leila M Harris, Diana Suhardiman, Lieke Melsen, Tom Buijse, Fabio de Castro, Leontien Cremers, Barbara Hogenboom, Mariela Garcia Vargas, Denisse Roca-Servat, Gert Jan Veldwisch, K J Joy","doi":"10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper develops the methodological concept of river co-learning arenas (RCAs) and explores their potential to strengthen innovative grassroots river initiatives, enliven river commons, regenerate river ecologies, and foster greater socio-ecological justice. The integrity of river systems has been threatened in profound ways over the last century. Pollution, damming, canalisation, and water grabbing are some examples of pressures threatening the entwined lifeworlds of human and non-human communities that depend on riverine systems. Finding ways to reverse the trends of environmental degradation demands complex spatial-temporal, political, and institutional articulations across different levels of governance (from local to global) and among a plurality of actors who operate from diverse spheres of knowledge and systems of practice, and who have distinct capacities to affect decision-making. In this context, grassroots river initiatives worldwide use new multi-actor and multi-level dialogue arenas to develop proposals for river regeneration and promote social-ecological justice in opposition to dominant technocratic-hydraulic development strategies. This paper conceptualises these spaces of dialogue and action as RCAs and critically reflects on ways of organising and supporting RCAs while facilitating their cross-fertilisation in transdisciplinary practice. By integrating studies, debates, and theories from diverse disciplines, we generate multi-faceted insights and present cornerstones for the engagement with and/or enaction of RCAs. This encompasses five main themes central to RCAs: (1) River knowledge encounters and truth regimes, (2) transgressive co-learning, (3) confrontation and collaboration dynamics, (4) ongoing reflexivity, (5) transcultural knowledge assemblages and translocal bridging of rooted knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":54257,"journal":{"name":"Local Environment","volume":"30 1","pages":"58-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2428215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper develops the methodological concept of river co-learning arenas (RCAs) and explores their potential to strengthen innovative grassroots river initiatives, enliven river commons, regenerate river ecologies, and foster greater socio-ecological justice. The integrity of river systems has been threatened in profound ways over the last century. Pollution, damming, canalisation, and water grabbing are some examples of pressures threatening the entwined lifeworlds of human and non-human communities that depend on riverine systems. Finding ways to reverse the trends of environmental degradation demands complex spatial-temporal, political, and institutional articulations across different levels of governance (from local to global) and among a plurality of actors who operate from diverse spheres of knowledge and systems of practice, and who have distinct capacities to affect decision-making. In this context, grassroots river initiatives worldwide use new multi-actor and multi-level dialogue arenas to develop proposals for river regeneration and promote social-ecological justice in opposition to dominant technocratic-hydraulic development strategies. This paper conceptualises these spaces of dialogue and action as RCAs and critically reflects on ways of organising and supporting RCAs while facilitating their cross-fertilisation in transdisciplinary practice. By integrating studies, debates, and theories from diverse disciplines, we generate multi-faceted insights and present cornerstones for the engagement with and/or enaction of RCAs. This encompasses five main themes central to RCAs: (1) River knowledge encounters and truth regimes, (2) transgressive co-learning, (3) confrontation and collaboration dynamics, (4) ongoing reflexivity, (5) transcultural knowledge assemblages and translocal bridging of rooted knowledge.

本文提出了河流共同学习场所 (RCA) 的方法论概念,并探讨了这些场所在加强基层河流创新活动、活跃河流公域、恢复河流生态以及促进社会生态公正方面的潜力。在上个世纪,河流系统的完整性受到了深刻的威胁。污染、筑坝、运河化和攫取水资源等压力威胁着依赖河流系统生存的人类和非人类社区的生活世界。要想找到扭转环境退化趋势的方法,就必须在不同的治理层面(从地方到全球)、在来自不同知识领域和实践体系的多元参与者之间建立复杂的时空、政治和制度联系,这些参与者具有影响决策的独特能力。在此背景下,世界各地的基层河流倡议利用新的多行为体和多层次对话平台,提出河流再生建议,促进社会生态正义,反对占主导地位的技术官僚水利发展战略。本文将这些对话和行动空间概念化为 RCA,并批判性地反思了组织和支持 RCA 的方式,同时促进其在跨学科实践中的相互促进。通过整合不同学科的研究、辩论和理论,我们得出了多方面的见解,并提出了参与和/或实施 RCA 的基石。这包括区域和国别评价的五大核心主题:(1) 河流知识交汇与真理机制,(2) 跨越式共同学习,(3) 对抗与合作动态,(4) 持续的反思性,(5) 跨文化知识组合和根植知识的跨地域桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Local Environment
Local Environment Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability is a refereed journal written by and for researchers, activists, non-governmental organisations, students, teachers, policy makers and practitioners. Our focus is specifically on sustainability planning, policy and politics in relation to theoretical, conceptual and empirical studies at the nexus of equity, justice and the local environment. It is an inclusive forum for diverse constituencies and perspectives to engage in a critical examination, evaluation and discussion of the environmental, social and economic policies, processes and strategies which will be needed in movement towards social justice and sustainability - "Just Sustainabilities" - at local, regional, national and global scales. Please note that we only accept submissions that share our focus. Based on critical research and practical experience, we are particularly seeking submissions from nations and continents representing different levels of income and industrial development and from countries in transition in order to engage in mutual learning and understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信