Sleep, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Intensity in Treatment Seeking Adults With Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Abagail Ault, Allison K Wilkerson, Jenna L McCauley, Wendy Muzzy, Georgia M Mappin, Shayla Yonce, Kelly S Barth, Kathleen T Brady, Mark S George, Sharlene Wedin, Lillian M Christon, Julianne C Flanagan, Anjinetta Yates-Johnson, Joshua Tutek, Tao Lin, Thomas W Uhde, Jeffrey J Borckardt
{"title":"Sleep, Pain Catastrophizing, and Pain Intensity in Treatment Seeking Adults With Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Abagail Ault, Allison K Wilkerson, Jenna L McCauley, Wendy Muzzy, Georgia M Mappin, Shayla Yonce, Kelly S Barth, Kathleen T Brady, Mark S George, Sharlene Wedin, Lillian M Christon, Julianne C Flanagan, Anjinetta Yates-Johnson, Joshua Tutek, Tao Lin, Thomas W Uhde, Jeffrey J Borckardt","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a large, growing, and difficult-to-treat problem. It has been associated with poor sleep, which has a relationship of mutual exacerbation with pain. These interrelationships have prompted interest in how pain catastrophizing (pain-related distortions of cognition), interacts with pain and sleep quality and quantity in those with OUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with chronic pain and OUD (N = 105) completed a battery of self-report assessments. A subset of these participants (N = 63) wore an actigraphy watch for 2 weeks. Six mediation models were evaluated in this cross-sectional study interrelating pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and sleep in previously published work were run 3 times each, measuring global sleep quality through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-reported total sleep time (TST) through Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and objective TST through actigraphy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three models yielded statistically significant results: (1) the relationship between global sleep quality and pain intensity mediated by pain catastrophizing (z = -2.00, P = 0.045), (2) the relationship between objective TST and pain intensity mediated by pain catastrophizing (z = -2.15, P = 0.032), and (3) the relationship between pain intensity and objective TST mediated by pain catastrophizing (z = -2.36, P = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pain catastrophizing is a significant mediator of the relationship between the mutually exacerbating factors of sleep quality and pain intensity, and is, therefore, an important treatment target in this population. In addition, objective TST and self-reported TST were only moderately correlated and behaved differently in mediation models, suggesting that more research is needed to understand the relationship between perceived sleep quality and sleep quantity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a large, growing, and difficult-to-treat problem. It has been associated with poor sleep, which has a relationship of mutual exacerbation with pain. These interrelationships have prompted interest in how pain catastrophizing (pain-related distortions of cognition), interacts with pain and sleep quality and quantity in those with OUD.

Methods: Participants with chronic pain and OUD (N = 105) completed a battery of self-report assessments. A subset of these participants (N = 63) wore an actigraphy watch for 2 weeks. Six mediation models were evaluated in this cross-sectional study interrelating pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and sleep in previously published work were run 3 times each, measuring global sleep quality through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-reported total sleep time (TST) through Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and objective TST through actigraphy.

Results: Three models yielded statistically significant results: (1) the relationship between global sleep quality and pain intensity mediated by pain catastrophizing (z = -2.00, P = 0.045), (2) the relationship between objective TST and pain intensity mediated by pain catastrophizing (z = -2.15, P = 0.032), and (3) the relationship between pain intensity and objective TST mediated by pain catastrophizing (z = -2.36, P = 0.018).

Conclusion: Pain catastrophizing is a significant mediator of the relationship between the mutually exacerbating factors of sleep quality and pain intensity, and is, therefore, an important treatment target in this population. In addition, objective TST and self-reported TST were only moderately correlated and behaved differently in mediation models, suggesting that more research is needed to understand the relationship between perceived sleep quality and sleep quantity.

阿片类药物使用障碍成人治疗中的睡眠、疼痛灾难和疼痛强度
目的:阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)是一个日益严重且难以治疗的问题。它与睡眠质量差有关,睡眠质量差与疼痛相互加剧。这些相互关系引起了人们对疼痛灾难化(与疼痛相关的认知扭曲)如何与OUD患者的疼痛和睡眠质量和时间相互作用的兴趣。方法:患有慢性疼痛和OUD的参与者(N = 105)完成了一系列自我报告评估。这些参与者中的一部分(N = 63)佩戴活动记录仪手表2周。本横断面研究评估了六种中介模型,将先前发表的研究成果中的疼痛强度、疼痛灾变和睡眠相互关联,每种模型运行3次,通过匹兹堡睡眠质量指数测量整体睡眠质量,通过匹兹堡睡眠质量指数测量自我报告的总睡眠时间(TST),以及通过活动仪测量客观TST。结果:(1)整体睡眠质量与疼痛灾难化介导的疼痛强度之间的关系(z = -2.00, P = 0.045);(2)客观TST与疼痛灾难化介导的疼痛强度之间的关系(z = -2.15, P = 0.032);(3)疼痛强度与疼痛灾难化介导的客观TST之间的关系(z = -2.36, P = 0.018)。结论:疼痛灾难化是睡眠质量与疼痛强度相互加剧因素之间关系的重要中介,因此是该人群的重要治疗目标。此外,客观睡眠质量和自我报告睡眠质量在中介模型中仅呈中度相关,且表现不同,这表明需要更多的研究来了解感知睡眠质量和睡眠量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信