Transportation considerations in underserved patient populations receiving multidisciplinary head and neck cancer care.

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2024058
Luke Stanisce, Donald H Solomon, Liam O'Neill, Nadir Ahmad, Brian Swendseid, Gregory J Kubicek, Yekaterina Koshkareva
{"title":"Transportation considerations in underserved patient populations receiving multidisciplinary head and neck cancer care.","authors":"Luke Stanisce, Donald H Solomon, Liam O'Neill, Nadir Ahmad, Brian Swendseid, Gregory J Kubicek, Yekaterina Koshkareva","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2024058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underinsured patients with advanced head and neck cancer experience worse outcomes compared to their well-insured peers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective logistic regression analysis testing associations between demographic, geospatial, transportation, disease, and treatment factors in 50 government insured or uninsured patients receiving curative-intent, multidisciplinary cancer care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty percent of patients missed at least one treatment or surveillance appointment within the first year. Thirty-two percent reported using public transportation; 42% relied on caregivers. Patients who used public transportation were 3.3 and 4.6 times more likely to miss treatment (p = 0.001) and surveillance (p = 0.014) visits, respectively. The median one-way travel duration for such routes was 52 minutes (range: 16-232 minutes) and included 0.7 miles of walking. Physical distance to care was not associated with transportation type, missed appointments, or disease recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Underserved, underinsured patient populations face significant logistical challenges with transportation, which may be mitigated by alternative models of care delivery, such as multidisciplinary clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"11 4","pages":"1125-1136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2024058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Underinsured patients with advanced head and neck cancer experience worse outcomes compared to their well-insured peers.

Methods: Retrospective logistic regression analysis testing associations between demographic, geospatial, transportation, disease, and treatment factors in 50 government insured or uninsured patients receiving curative-intent, multidisciplinary cancer care.

Results: Forty percent of patients missed at least one treatment or surveillance appointment within the first year. Thirty-two percent reported using public transportation; 42% relied on caregivers. Patients who used public transportation were 3.3 and 4.6 times more likely to miss treatment (p = 0.001) and surveillance (p = 0.014) visits, respectively. The median one-way travel duration for such routes was 52 minutes (range: 16-232 minutes) and included 0.7 miles of walking. Physical distance to care was not associated with transportation type, missed appointments, or disease recurrence.

Conclusions: Underserved, underinsured patient populations face significant logistical challenges with transportation, which may be mitigated by alternative models of care delivery, such as multidisciplinary clinics.

接受多学科头颈癌治疗的服务不足患者群体的交通考虑。
背景:保险不足的晚期头颈癌患者与保险良好的同龄人相比,预后更差。方法:回顾性logistic回归分析,检验50例政府参保或未参保的接受多学科治疗的癌症患者的人口统计学、地理空间、交通、疾病和治疗因素之间的相关性。结果:40%的患者在第一年内至少错过了一次治疗或监测预约。32%的人使用公共交通工具;42%的人依赖照顾者。使用公共交通的患者错过治疗(p = 0.001)和监测(p = 0.014)的可能性分别为3.3倍和4.6倍。这些路线的单程旅行时间中位数为52分钟(范围:16-232分钟),包括0.7英里的步行。到医疗中心的物理距离与交通方式、错过预约或疾病复发无关。结论:服务不足、保险不足的患者群体面临着运输方面的重大后勤挑战,这可能会通过其他医疗服务模式得到缓解,如多学科诊所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信